Donald Trump’s presidency, it should finally become clear whether the U.S. president’s brazen rhetoric on the subject is simply a negotiating ploy in the pursuit of new deals or whether a trade war—and with it the destruction of the post-World War II international order—is his real end goal.
Until now, it has been rather hard to tell. Trump withdrew from the Trans-Pacific Partnership without ever proposing a replacement, and he appeared ready to do the same with the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). He imposed stiff levies on imported steel and aluminum, leading Canada, China, Mexico, and the European Union to slap the United States with retaliatory tariffs. At the same time, however, his administration ultimately agreed to a renegotiated NAFTA without major changes to the original agreement. It did the same for the U.S. free trade agreement with South Korea. So what signs could reveal his true intentions in 2019?
The first area to watch will be cars. The Trump administration’s legal justification for its 2018 steel and aluminum tariffs was a little-used U.S. statute that allows the president to raise such barriers in cases where U.S. national security is threatened. In mid-2018, the Commerce Department also started looking into whether imported automobiles might pose a similar threat—a sign that the administration was seriously considering imposing duties as high as 25 percent on foreign cars and auto parts, which would affect more than $200 billion worth of trade.
Trump may lack the audacity to go that far, since he would face stiff opposition. U.S. automobile producers oppose such protectionism because they often import cars and parts from their overseas factories. Higher taxes on autos would also hit U.S. households in a more direct way than levies on steel and aluminum. And European trade partners would likely retaliate with more tariffs on U.S. farmers, manufacturers, and other exporters.
If Trump makes good on his threat anyway, the administration might argue that the goal is to get a better deal from trading partners—a reduction in European Union automobile tariffs, say. But the more likely goal of such a move would be to dismantle global automobile supply chains and fully reshore production in the name of helping blue-collar workers.
The second thing to watch will be Washington’s stance toward Beijing. So far, the Trump administration’s actions could be read as either an attempt to force China to change its economic practices or an effort to simply punish it by dismantling the trade partnership.
So far, the Trump administration’s actions could be read as either an attempt to force China to change its economic practices or an effort to simply punish it by dismantling the trade partnership.
Trump has imposed about $250 billion worth of duties on Chinese goods, on the grounds that China’s own protectionism and its theft of U.S. technology pose strategic threats to the United States, but has hinted that they may be reversible if China changes its ways. At the same time, his administration has shown little interest in negotiations, which would have to be a precursor to any potential deal.
The key to figuring out Trump’s true intentions will be whether his administration follows through with its plans to raise some of the new tariffs from 10 percent to 25 percent and to expand them to cover an additional $267 billion worth of Chinese exports, including Apple products such the iPhone, which have so far remained exempt. If the administration walks down that path, then trade punishment would be the likely end game, particularly since China will never change its economic model in response to what it sees as U.S. bullying.
Third, Trump will have to take a stand on the World Trade Organization (WTO), a body that regulates trade among its 164 members. Trump has called the organization the worst trade deal ever reached—even worse than NAFTA—and on several occasions has expressed his desire to leave it.
As with many of his other moves, however, his goals are far from clear. On the one hand, his administration has continued to use the WTO by bringing new cases against other countries—including China, for example, which the United States claims has violated the letter or the spirit of various WTO agreements. At the same time, however, Washington has also denounced WTO decisions that have gone against the United States as examples of judicial overreach and has blocked the appointment of new jurists to the WTO’s appellate body.
In the coming year, as the WTO cases move forward, the administration will have to show its cards. If its current attempts to disrupt the organization are for the purpose of bringing about procedural changes, it will have to make clear what changes it actually desires. If it doesn’t, we can assume that Trump plans to abandon the institution by ignoring it.
With the current trading statistics of U.S. trade with Canada and Mexico, does the opposition to the agrreements seem j...
5. In the past two years. U.S. trade with China, Canada, and Mexico has been growing faster than trade with a Japan and Germany Germany, but slower than trade with Japan Japan, but slower than trade with Germany Neither Japan nor Germany (growing slower than trade with Japan and Germany) None of the above e.
NAFTA-NAFTA will soon be replaced by a new trade agreement between the U.S. and Mexico. Evaluate the exchange rate-trade effect around NAFTA’s inception in 1994. Answer the questions below. Discuss how the bilateral trade balances between the U.S. Mexico have changed pre- and post- NAFTA. (Hint: trade deficit or trade surplus?) How has the $/peso exchange rates changed from 1990 to 2001? Comment on the appreciations and depreciations of both currencies, pre- and post-NAFTA. Discuss possible linkages between NAFTA and...
When Mexico trades cement for U.S. computers, the gains from trade can be expressed as: 1. trade allows Mexico to obtain more computers for the same amount of cement 2. trade allows Mexico to experience a rise in gross domestic product 3. trade allows winners to compensate losers and still come out ahead 4. all of the other answers are correct 5. trade allows the U.S. to obtain cement at a lower resource cost
Why Auto Makers Are Building New Factories in Mexico, Not the U.S. Mexico has accelerated past the U.S. South in the global competition for auto investment. Mexico’s low wages and improved logistics were part of the draw. Also, many companies, such as Audi, are attracted by Mexico’s unrivaled trade relationships. Mexico has more than 40 different free-trade agreements. The pacts give exporters from Mexico duty-free access to markets that contain 60% of the world’s economic output. The United States is...
Do we have too many vast cultural differences (among the U.S./Canada/Mexico) to do so?
Explain the trilateral trade agreement between Canada-The United States-Mexico (CUSMA) in one/two paragraphs. (Don’t forget to list proper citation for your answer)
What are the three categories into which Statistics Canada divides everyone? How does Statistics Canada compute the labour force, the unemployment rate, and the labour-force participation rate?
Countries measure the health of their economies in many ways such as unemployment rates, consumer confidence, and Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Gross Domestic Product is a measurement of the amount of goods produced by a country in one year. If that number increases, our economy is growing, whereas a decrease would indicate a shrinking economy. To calculate expenditure GDP we add up all of the groups who buy goods in the economy (GDP = C + I + G +...
If you were to log onto www.census.gov and click on "Foreign Trade," then click on "Statistics," and finally on "State Export Data," you will find a list of the products produced in your state, which are exported around the world. You discover that Ohio exports more to Canada and Mexico than all other countries combined. Is this factsurprising? A. No, because of NAFTA, you would expect the export of goods to Canada and Mexico to be substantial. B. Yes, because...
QUESTION 17 A regional trade agreement formed between the US, Canada, and Mexico is ca. CAFTA b. NAFTA CC. EUFTA Cd. SAFTA QUESTION 18 Which of the following is included in the cost of education? Ca. direct costs such as books Cb.opportunity costs cc. direct costs and opportunity costs d. time QUESTION 19 An educational reform program that allows parents a choice about where their children attend schools are known as a segregated schools b.charter schools C. voucher schools d....