Question

The Terry Schiavo case dominated the media for weeks in the final stages of the legal case against her husband and his desire to terminate her life, with him suggesting she would not want to live with her condition. Some suggest that this case resulted in the legislature (i.e. government) determining the morality of this case.

• 1. Do you think the government intervened for moral or legal purposes?
• 2. Do you think the government should have been involved in this case at all? Why or why not?

Validate your answer with what you know and understand about morals, values, virtues, and situational ethics.

Answer 1

ANSWER:- Mercy killing is "The act of putting a person (89) animal to death painlessly 1099 allowing them to die by with holding medical Services, usually because of a painful and inculable disease." mercy Killing is also se ferred to as "Euthanasia'. → Government did the right thing to intervene a between. Teary is a citizen of the country and for all citizens government is responsible to great Extends. Government wants to See Weather a right methods were used for curing? weather is there anything else for a better treatment can be performed with Terry to Care. And if it is there then Terry should get a better treatment.