I just need help with detailed explanations for b and c
Hello, please comment if there is any more requirement from the question. I will be happy to help. Please give a thumbs up if the solution helped you.
I am providing an explanation in detail. Please comment if you
need step by step solution.
Answer B)
Here we are given two statements-
1 - p implies q and r.
2 - not of q is true
statement 2 implies that q is false.
this implies the AND of q and r is also false.
So, first statement becomes p implies a false statement.
hence if a statment implies something false than the statement itself is false.
There fore, the inference that the not of p is true.
Answer C)
Here again,
Statement 1 - p AND q implies r
Statement 2 - not of R is true
Statement 3 - q is true
here as not of r is true, this implies r is false.
now as first statement , p and q implies r becomes- p and q implies false.
So p and q should also be false.
for an AND to be false, either one or both of the p and q has to be false.
Here from statement 3 we know that q is true, so
p has to be false,
hence the inference that not of p is true.
I just need help with detailed explanations for b and c Use the rules of inference...
The only 9 rules of inference allowed are: 1. Modus Ponens (MP) 2. Modus Tollens (MT) 3. Hypothetical Syllogism (HS) 4. Disjunctive Syllogism (DS) 5. Constructive Dilemma (CD) 6. Simplification (Simp) 7. Conjunction (Conj) 8. Addition (Add) 9 absorption SECTION ONE: Formal proofs of validity using natural deductions Prove the following argument valid using the nine rules of inference. Copy-and-paste key of symbols: • v - = i Argument Two (1) A5B (2) ( A B ) > C (3)...
Derive the conclusion in a series of new lines via natural deduction proof. Include previously referenced lines and rules of implication: [Modus Tollens, Modus Ponens, Hypothetical Syllogism, Disjunctive Syllogism, Constructive Dilemma, Simplification, Conjunction, or Addition] 3 NC ru NNV R Add Line
-Use the rules of inference and the laws of propositional logic to prove that each argument is valid. Number each line of your argument and label each line of your proof "Hypothesis" or with the name of the rule of inference used at that line. If a rule of inference is used, then include the numbers of the previous lines to which the rule is applied. For the arguments stated in English, transform them into propositional logic first. a) (10...
How to do this problem for discrete math. Use the rules of inference to show that if V x (Ax) v α刈and V xứcAx) Λ α where the domains of all quantifiers are the same. Construct your argument by rearranging the following building blocks. ) → Rx)) are true, then V x("A(x) → A is also tr 1. We will show that if the premises are true, then (1A(a) → Pla) for every a. 2. Suppose -R(a) is true for...
There is an argument form other than modus ponens or modus tollens in each of the following arguments. Match argument and argument form.One needs to be a gold club member and at least 18 years old to use the gym at the Palace Hotel. Daryl is 19 years old. Daryl is also a gold club member. Therefore, Daryl can use the gym at the Palace Hotel.Quetzalcoatl was the Aztec patron deity of, among others, metal and stone work. Therefore, he...
14. True or False Aa Aa Use your knowledge of natural deduction in propositional logic and your knowledge of the rules of implication to determine wichof the following statements are true. Place a check mark in the box beside each true statement. You cannot apply any rules of implication to parts of whole lines The addition (Add) rule always yields a disjunction as its conclusion. Addition (Add) allows you to connect together with a dot the propositions on any previous...
Use laws of equivalence and inference rules to show how you can derive the conclusions from the given premises. Be sure to cite the rule used at each line and the line numbers of the hypotheses used for each rule. a) Givens: 1. a ∧ b 2. c → ¬a 3. c ∨ d Conclusion: d b) Givens 1. p → (q ∧ r) 2. ¬r Conclusion ¬p
its critical thinking no numbers given Styles Styles Pane Dictate V. Argument Forms. For each argument, give the argument form. Choices are modus ponens, modus tollens, hypothetical syllogism, and disjunctive syllogism. (2 points each). If someone is a competent language user, he or she can be a good critical thinker I am a competent language user Therefore, I can be a good critical thinker If John has a dog, John has a pet If John has a pet, John is...
Which lines in the following are not valid? #1 please Put an 'x' at the end of the proof line which has the error and write the number of the error made listed on the Restrictions on Quantifier Inference Rules Which lines in the following are not valid? Explain why in each case (1) 1. (9[(Нх Кх) — Мх] 2. (ЭхХ Нх- Кх) 3. Нх- Кх 2 EI 4. Mx 1,3 MP 5. (Эх)Мх 4 EG 1. (х(Мx D Gx)...