Average Rate of Return Method, Net Present Value Method, and Analysis for a service company
The capital investment committee of Arches Landscaping Company is considering two capital investments. The estimated income from operations and net cash flows from each investment are as follows:
Front-End Loader | Greenhouse | |||||||||
Year | Income from Operations |
Net Cash Flow |
Income from Operations |
Net Cash Flow |
||||||
1 | $39,100 | $122,000 | $82,000 | $195,000 | ||||||
2 | 39,100 | 122,000 | 63,000 | 165,000 | ||||||
3 | 39,100 | 122,000 | 31,000 | 116,000 | ||||||
4 | 39,100 | 122,000 | 14,000 | 79,000 | ||||||
5 | 39,100 | 122,000 | 5,500 | 55,000 | ||||||
Total | $195,500 | $610,000 | $195,500 | $610,000 |
Each project requires an investment of $460,000. Straight-line depreciation will be used, and no residual value is expected. The committee has selected a rate of 10% for purposes of the net present value analysis.
Present Value of $1 at Compound Interest | |||||
Year | 6% | 10% | 12% | 15% | 20% |
1 | 0.943 | 0.909 | 0.893 | 0.870 | 0.833 |
2 | 0.890 | 0.826 | 0.797 | 0.756 | 0.694 |
3 | 0.840 | 0.751 | 0.712 | 0.658 | 0.579 |
4 | 0.792 | 0.683 | 0.636 | 0.572 | 0.482 |
5 | 0.747 | 0.621 | 0.567 | 0.497 | 0.402 |
6 | 0.705 | 0.564 | 0.507 | 0.432 | 0.335 |
7 | 0.665 | 0.513 | 0.452 | 0.376 | 0.279 |
8 | 0.627 | 0.467 | 0.404 | 0.327 | 0.233 |
9 | 0.592 | 0.424 | 0.361 | 0.284 | 0.194 |
10 | 0.558 | 0.386 | 0.322 | 0.247 | 0.162 |
Required:
1a. Compute the average rate of return for each investment. If required, round your answer to one decimal place.
Average Rate of Return | |
Front-End Loader | % |
Greenhouse | % |
1b. Compute the net present value for each investment. Use the present value of $1 table above. If required, use the minus sign to indicate a negative net present value.
Front-End Loader | Greenhouse | |
Present value of net cash flow | $ | $ |
Amount to be invested | $ | $ |
Net present value | $ | $ |
2. Prepare a brief report for the capital investment committee, advising it on the relative merits of the two investments.
The front-end loader has a smaller net present value because cash flows occur later in time compared to the greenhouse. Thus, if only one of the two projects can be accepted, the greenhouse would be the more attractive.
Question 1A :
Front End Loader | ||
Calculation of Average Rate of Return | ||
Year | Income from Operations | |
1 | $ 39,100.00 | |
2 | $ 39,100.00 | |
3 | $ 39,100.00 | |
4 | $ 39,100.00 | |
5 | $ 39,100.00 | |
Total for 5 Years | $ 1,95,500.00 | |
Average Profits | =$195500/5 | |
$ 39,100.00 | ||
ARR = Average Profits/ Average Investment = $39100/$460000=8.5% | ||
Green House | ||
Calculation of Average Rate of Return | ||
Year | Income from Operations | |
1 | $ 82,000.00 | |
2 | $ 63,000.00 | |
3 | $ 31,000.00 | |
4 | $ 14,000.00 | |
5 | $ 5,500.00 | |
Total for 5 Years | $ 1,95,500.00 | |
Average Profits | =$195500/5 | |
$ 39,100.00 | ||
ARR = Average Profits/ Average Investment = $39100/$460000=8.5% |
It can be noticed that ARRis same in both the cases because it haven't considered Time Value of Money. Now, Analyze these cases with NPV Technique.
Question 1B:
Calculation of PV of Cashflows for Front End Loader | |||
Year | Net Cashflow | PVf@10% | PV of Cashflows |
1 | $ 1,22,000.00 | 0.909091 | $ 1,10,909.09 |
2 | $ 1,22,000.00 | 0.826446 | $ 1,00,826.45 |
3 | $ 1,22,000.00 | 0.751315 | $ 91,660.41 |
4 | $ 1,22,000.00 | 0.683013 | $ 83,327.64 |
5 | $ 1,22,000.00 | 0.620921 | $ 75,752.40 |
Present Value of Cash Inflows | $ 4,62,475.99 | ||
Present Value of Cash Outflows | $ 4,60,000.00 | ||
NPV of Project | $ 2,475.99 | ||
Calculation of PV of Cashflows for Green House | |||
Year | Net Cashflow | PVf@10% | PV of Cashflows |
1 | $ 1,95,000.00 | 0.909091 | $ 1,77,272.73 |
2 | $ 1,65,000.00 | 0.826446 | $ 1,36,363.64 |
3 | $ 1,16,000.00 | 0.751315 | $ 87,152.52 |
4 | $ 79,000.00 | 0.683013 | $ 53,958.06 |
5 | $ 55,000.00 | 0.620921 | $ 34,150.67 |
Present Value of Cashflows | $ 4,88,897.62 | ||
Present Value of Cash Outflows | $ 4,60,000.00 | ||
NPV of Project | $ 28,897.62 |
Question 2
The front-end loader NPV is low because cash flows occur later in time compared to the greenhouse. Thus, if only one of the two projects can be accepted, the greenhouse would be the more attractive.
Average Rate of Return Method, Net Present Value Method, and Analysis for a service company The...
Average Rate of Return Method, Net Present Value Method, and Analysis for a service company The capital investment committee of Arches Landscaping Company is considering two capital investments. The estimated income from operations and net cash flows from each investment are as follows: Front-End Loader Greenhouse Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Income from Operations Net Cash Flow 1 $59,400 $195,000 $125,000 $312,000 2 59,400 195,000 95,000 263,000 3 59,400 195,000 48,000 185,000 4 59,400 195,000 21,000 127,000 5...
Average Rate of Return Method, Net Present Value Method, and Analysis for a service company The capital investment committee of Arches Landscaping Company is considering two capital investments. The estimated income from operations and net cash flows from each investment are as follows: Front-End Loader Greenhouse Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Income from Operations Net Cash Flow 1 $41,800 $127,000 $88,000 $203,000 2 41,800 127,000 67,000 171,000 3 41,800 127,000 33,000 121,000 4 41,800 127,000 15,000 83,000 5...
Average Rate of Return Method, Net Present Value Method, and Analysis for a service company The capital investment committee of Arches Landscaping Company is considering two capital investments. The estimated income from operations and net cash flows from each investment are as follows: Front-End Loader Greenhouse Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Income from Operations Net Cash Flow 1 $38,000 $119,000 $80,000 $190,000 2 38,000 119,000 61,000 161,000 3 38,000 119,000 30,000 113,000 4 38,000 119,000 13,000 77,000 5...
Average Rate of Return Method, Net Present Value Method, and Analysis for a service company The capital investment committee of Arches Landscaping Company is considering two capital investments. The estimated income from operations and net cash flows from each investment are as follows: Front-End Loader Greenhouse Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Income from Operations Net Cash Flow 1 $45,600 $141,000 $96,000 $226,000 2 45,600 141,000 73,000 190,000 3 45,600 141,000 36,000 134,000 4 45,600 141,000 16,000 92,000 5...
Average Rate of Return Method, Net Present Value Method, and Analysis for a service company The capital investment committee of Arches Landscaping Company is considering two capital investments. The estimated operating income and net cash flows from each investment are as follows: Front-End Loader Greenhouse Net Cash Operating Income Net Cash Flow Operating Income Year Flow $38,000 $80,000 $119,000 119,000 38,000 61,000 $190,000 161,000 113,000 77,000 38,000 119,000 30,000 38,000 119,000 13,000 38,000 119,000 6,000 54,000 Total $190,000 $595,000 $190,000...
1303 Problems: Series A Average rate of return method, net present value method, and analysis The capital investment committee of Nature's Portrait Landscaping Company is consider- ing two capital investments. The estimated income from operations and net cash flows from each investment are as follows: OBJ. 2, 3 V 1. a. 30.096 Excel Front-End Loader Income from Net Cash Income from Operations Net Cash Operations $25,000 20,000 7,000 3,000 1,250 S56,250 Year Flow Me How 22,000 18,000 16,250 $131,250 $11,250...
Average Rate of Return Method, A method of analysis of proposed capital investments that focuses on the present value of the cash flows expected from the investments.Net Present Value Method, and Analysis for a service company The capital investment committee of Arches Landscaping Company is considering two capital investments. The estimated operating income and net cash flows from each investment are as follows: Front-End Loader Greenhouse Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Operating Income Net Cash Flow 1 $55,000 $173,000...
Average Rate of Return Method, Net Present Value Method, and analysis for a flervice Company The capital investment Committee of the Transport and Storage Inc. is considering to investment projects. The estimated income from operations and are as follows cash flows from each investment Warehous Tracking Technology Income from Operations Income from Operations Flow I $ 61,400 $135.000 $ 34,400 $108.00 51,400 125,000 34.400 100,000 36,400 110,000 34.400 100,000 26.400 100.000 34.400 100,000 (3.600) 70.000 34,400 100.000 $172,000 $540,000 $172.000...
Average Rate of Return Method, Net Present Value Method, and Analysis The capital investment committee of Ellis Transport and Storage Inc. is considering two investment projects. The estimated income from operations and net cash flows from each investment are as follows: Warehouse Tracking Technology Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Income from Operations Net Cash Flow $40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 $200,000 $128,000 128,000 128,000 128,000 128,000 $640,000 $84,000 64,000 32,000 14,000 6,000 $200,000 $205,000 173,000 122,000 83,000 57,000...
The capital investment committee of Arches Landscaping Company is considering two capital investments. The estimated income from operations and net cash flows from each investment are as follows: Front-End Loader Greenhouse Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Income from Operations Net Cash Flow 1 $39,600 $123,000 $83,000 $197,000 2 39,600 123,000 63,000 166,000 3 39,600 123,000 32,000 117,000 4 39,600 123,000 14,000 80,000 5 39,600 123,000 6,000 55,000 Total $198,000 $615,000 $198,000 $615,000 Each project requires an investment of...