A terrible new virus has been discovered amongst beef-cattle in Southern Alberta. It is estimated that 6% of all beef-cattle are infected with this virus. A team of veterinarians have developed a simple test. Indications are that this test will show a positive result - indicating the beef-cow being tested has the virus - with a probability of 0.95. Unfortunately, this test has a false-positive probability of 0.09.
(a) A beef-cow in Southern Alberta was randomly chosen and given this test. The test results were positive, indicating the beef-cow has the virus. What is the probability that this particular beef-cow actually does have the virus?
(b) What is the probability that a beef-cow that tests negative for this virus, actually has the virus?
a)
P(tested positive)=P(virus and tested positive)+P(not have virus and tested positive)
=0.06*0.95+(1-0.06)*0.09=0.1416
therefore probability that this particular beef-cow actually does have the virus given tested positive
=P(virus and tested positive)/P(tested positive)=0.06*0.95/0.1416=0.402542
b)
P(tested negative)=1-P(tested positive)=1-0.1416=0.8584
hence P(actually has the virus given tested negative)
=P(virus and tested negative)/P(tested negative)=0.06*(1-0.95)/0.8584=0.003495
A terrible new virus has been discovered amongst beef-cattle in Southern Alberta. It is estimated that ...
RBV testing Suppose that 1% of all people are infected with the rare banana virus (RBV). There is a test to detect the RBV: if you do have the RBV, then the test will correctly detect this 99% of the time; if you do not have RBV, then the test will correctly indicate this 97% of the time. We assume that if the RBV test is given repeatedly to the same person, then the test results are independent of cach...