When attempt to answer the first question then we assume a functional form for the marginal cost and marginal benefit curves. We can then integrate that assumed function because total cost and total benefits are the integral functions of marginal cost and marginal benefits. For the sake of ease we can assume MC=x and MB= 1-x. we can then integrate them and plot the required graph
II. Assume we're in a system in which marginal costs and benefits follow the figure below...
1. Working with Numbers and Graphs Q1 Suppose the marginal costs of reading are constant at $6 per hour, while the marginal benefits of reading decline (over time) as more reading is performed. In particular, suppose the following table contains the marginal benefit associated with various levels of hours spent reading Time Spent Reading Marginal Benefits (Hours)(Dollars per hour) 10 16 40 Assume the marginal-benefit curve is a straight line through the two points described in the table on the...
Refer to the graph below. The graph shows marginal benefits (MB) and marginal cost (M) of activity A MC Marginal benefit and cost (dollars) MB 500 100 200 300 400 Activity A If the decision maker is choosing 300 units of activity A, O this level maximizes net benefits. O if the activity is increased by one unit, net benefits will increase by $20. O if the activity is decreased by one unit, net benefits will decrease by $20. O...
Question 2: Working with Marginal Benefits and Costs Suppose the total benefit derived from a continuous decisions, Q, is B() 200-202 and the total cost from deciding Q is C(Q)-4Q +20. The marginal benefit (MB) and marginal cost (MC) is the first order derivative of these functions. MB)2040 and MC() 4 +40 (1) (4 points, 2 each) What is the total benefit when Q-2? Q-10? (2) (4 points, 2 each) What is the marginal benefit when Q-2? Q 10? (3)...
Only need answer for a and b, thanks 1. Hybrid Instruments and Expected Net Benefits. This problem reinforces the concepts covered in the last problem set and examines what happens when we combine price and quantity instruments Congress is interested in regulating emissions of a hazardous pollutant. Economists at the EPA have estimated the marginal costs and benefits of tions aggregate emission reduc- MB=25--Q MC = 5 + Q (a) What is the efficient level of pollution reduction? What tax...
Equations and Graphs Part 4. Economic 1 Suppose the marginal costs (MC) af reading are constant& the marginal benofits (MB) 3. Jim coukd undertake actvity X but chooses not to. Draw the marginal beneft ot eading dedne (over tne) nitially. the MB of Reading are greaker than the MC and cost curves for acivity X from Jim's perspective. (Draw the marginal cost Draw the MB curve and MC curve of studying. & identily the efficient amount of curve as upward...
Question 2: Working with Marginal Benefits and Costs Suppose the total benefit derived from a continuous decisions, Q, ís B(Q) = 200-202 and the total cost from deciding Q is C(O) 4+2Q. The marginal benefit (MB) and marginal cost (MC) is the first order derivative of these functions. MBO) 20-4 and MC(O) 4+40 (1) (4 points, 2 each) What is the total benefit when Q-2? Q-10? (2) (4 points, 2 each) What is the marginal benefit when Q-2? Q-10? (3)...
Suppose the marginal external cost of emissions of a certain substance is equal to $16. Furthermore assume that there are two sources of these emissions. The unregulated emissions (Ei), total cost of abatement (TCA), and marginal cost of abatement (MCA) for the two sources are given below TCA, = (Al)2 MCA -2A MCA2 - A2 Source 1: E,-20 E, = 20 Source 2: TCA25%(A). abatement for each source? Illustrate in a diagram. [6] a function of the tax? What is...
Two thermic power plants have the following marginal and total cost of abatement of nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions. When faced with no restrictions each of them emits maximum 100 ppm (parts per million) of NOx. Firm 1: MAC1=5 A1 TAC1=2.5 (A1)^2 Firm 2: MAC2 = 10 A2 TAC2= 5(A2)^2 (8 pts) The EPA finds the total NOx emissions of 200 ppm too much and seeks for improvement in air quality by specifying the reduction of 40% in total emissions from...
Consider two firms (i.e., firms 1 & 2) with heterogeneous marginal abatement cost functions: MAC1=12 - 2E1 MAC2 =10 - E2 Assume the marginal external damages from emissions are: M E D = 1/2 E A . where EA is the sum of the two firms’ emissions. What quantity of emissions do firms produce in the absence of government intervention? What are the total external damages? What are the total abatement costs? Derive the aggregate marginal abatement cost function (Hint:...
Consider two firms (i.e., firms 1 & 2) with heterogeneous marginal abatement cost functions: MAC1 =12−2E1MAC2 =10−E2. Assume the marginal external damages from emissions are: M E D = 12 E A . where EA is the sum of the two firms’ emissions. What quantity of emissions do firms produce in the absence of government intervention? What are the total external damages? What are the total abatement costs? Derive the aggregate marginal abatement cost function (Hint: This will be a...