AAPL- A& B | |
a. Basic assumptions: | |
Initial cost | |
Cost of manufacturing facility | -71000 |
Delivery&Installation | -1200 |
Total outlay | -72200 |
MACRS rates | |
Year | Rate % |
1 | 20 |
2 | 32 |
3 | 19 |
4 | 12 |
5 | 11 |
6 | 6 |
100 | |
Salvage | 5000 |
After-tax salvage(5000*(1-40%)) | 3000 |
Changes to working capital: | |
Increase in receivables | -25000 |
Increase in inventories | -6000 |
Increase in a/cs pay. & accruals | 5000 |
Net change in w/c | -26000 |
b. Project's net Time 0 Cash flows | |
Total initial outlay | -72200 |
Net change in w/c | -26000 |
Total time 0 cash flows | -98200 |
Year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
Addl.revenue due to expansion | 105000 | 105000 | 105000 | 97000 | 88000 | 88000 | |
Addl.operating costs(excl.depn.) | -68000 | -68000 | -68000 | -68000 | -68000 | -68000 | |
Depreciation(DEP) | -14440 | -23104 | -13718 | -8664 | -7942 | -4332 | |
EBIT(or opg.inc.) | 22560 | 13896 | 23282 | 20336 | 12058 | 15668 | |
Taxes on opg. Inc. | -9024 | -5558 | -9313 | -8134 | -4823 | -6267 | |
After-tax project opg. Inc.(OI) | 13536 | 8338 | 13969 | 12202 | 7235 | 9401 | |
Opg. Cash flow(OI+DEP) | 27976 | 31442 | 27687 | 20866 | 15177 | 13733 | |
Recovery of W/c | 98200 | ||||||
Salvage after-tax | 3000 | ||||||
Project net cash flows | |||||||
(opg.+non-opg.) | -98200 | 27976 | 31442 | 27687 | 20866 | 15177 | 114933 |
NPV(Excel fn.) | 51651.548 | ||||||
Verification of NPV as per Excel | |||||||
PV F at 12% | 1 | 0.892857 | 0.797194 | 0.71178 | 0.635518 | 0.567427 | 0.506631 |
PV at 12% | -98200 | 24978.57 | 25065.05 | 19707.2 | 13260.47 | 8611.724 | 58228.53 |
NPV | 51651.548 |
AAPL-C | |||||||
a. Basic assumptions: | |||||||
Initial cost | |||||||
Cost of manufacturing facility | -71000 | ||||||
Delivery&Installation | -1200 | ||||||
Total outlay | -72200 | ||||||
MACRS rates | |||||||
Year | Rate % | ||||||
1 | 20 | ||||||
2 | 32 | ||||||
3 | 19 | ||||||
4 | 12 | ||||||
5 | 11 | ||||||
6 | 6 | ||||||
100 | |||||||
Salvage | 1400 | ||||||
After-tax salvage(1400*(1-40%)) | 840 | ||||||
Changes to working capital: | |||||||
Increase in receivables | -25000 | ||||||
Increase in inventories | -6000 | ||||||
Increase in a/cs payables & accruals | 5000 | ||||||
Net change in w/c | -26000 | ||||||
b. Project's net Time 0 Cash flows | |||||||
Total initial outlay | -72200 | ||||||
Net change in w/c | -26000 | ||||||
Total time 0 cash flows | -98200 | ||||||
Year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
Addl.revenue due to expansion | 105000 | 105000 | 105000 | 97000 | 88000 | 88000 | |
Addl.operating costs(excl.depn.) | -68000 | -68000 | -68000 | -68000 | -68000 | -68000 | |
Depreciation(DEP) | -14440 | -23104 | -13718 | -8664 | -7942 | -4332 | |
EBIT(or opg.inc.) | 22560 | 13896 | 23282 | 20336 | 12058 | 15668 | |
Taxes on opg. Inc. | -9024 | -5558 | -9313 | -8134 | -4823 | -6267 | |
After-tax project opg. Inc.(OI) | 13536 | 8338 | 13969 | 12202 | 7235 | 9401 | |
Opg. Cash flow(OI+DEP) | 27976 | 31442 | 27687 | 20866 | 15177 | 13733 | |
Recovery of W/c | 98200 | ||||||
Salvage after-tax | 840 | ||||||
Project net cash flows | |||||||
(opg.+non-opg.) | -98200 | 27976 | 31442 | 27687 | 20866 | 15177 | 112773 |
NPV(Excel fn.) | 50557.225 | ||||||
Verification of NPV as per Excel | |||||||
PV F at 12% | 1 | 0.892857 | 0.797194 | 0.71178 | 0.635518 | 0.567427 | 0.506631 |
PV at 12% | -98200 | 24978.57 | 25065.05 | 19707.2 | 13260.47 | 8611.724 | 57134.21 |
NPV | 50557.225 |
AAPL-D | |||||||
a. Basic assumptions: | |||||||
Initial cost | |||||||
Cost of manufacturing facility | -71000 | ||||||
Delivery&Installation | -1200 | ||||||
Total outlay | -72200 | ||||||
MACRS rates | |||||||
Year | Rate % | ||||||
1 | 33 | ||||||
2 | 45 | ||||||
3 | 15 | ||||||
4 | 7 | ||||||
5 | 0 | ||||||
6 | 0 | ||||||
100 | |||||||
Salvage | 1400 | ||||||
After-tax salvage(1400*(1-40%)) | 840 | ||||||
Changes to working capital: | |||||||
Increase in receivables | -25000 | ||||||
Increase in inventories | -6000 | ||||||
Increase in a/cs payables & accruals | 5000 | ||||||
Net change in w/c | -26000 | ||||||
b. Project's net Time 0 Cash flows | |||||||
Total initial outlay | -72200 | ||||||
Net change in w/c | -26000 | ||||||
Total time 0 cash flows | -98200 | ||||||
Year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
Addl.revenue due to expansion | 105000 | 105000 | 105000 | 97000 | 88000 | 88000 | |
Addl.operating costs(excl.depn.) | -68000 | -68000 | -68000 | -68000 | -68000 | -68000 | |
Depreciation(DEP) | -23826 | -32490 | -10830 | -5054 | 0 | 0 | |
EBIT(or opg.inc.) | 13174 | 4510 | 26170 | 23946 | 20000 | 20000 | |
Taxes on opg. Inc. | -5269.6 | -1804 | -10468 | -9578 | -8000 | -8000 | |
After-tax project opg. Inc.(OI) | 7904.4 | 2706 | 15702 | 14368 | 12000 | 12000 | |
Opg. Cash flow(OI+DEP) | 31730.4 | 35196 | 26532 | 19422 | 12000 | 12000 | |
Recovery of W/c | 98200 | ||||||
Salvage after-tax | 840 | ||||||
Project net cash flows | |||||||
(opg.+non-opg.) | -98200 | 31730.4 | 35196 | 26532 | 19422 | 12000 | 111040 |
NPV(Excel fn.) | 52481.923 | ||||||
Verification of NPV as per Excel | |||||||
PV F at 12% | 1 | 0.892857 | 0.797194 | 0.71178 | 0.635518 | 0.567427 | 0.506631 |
PV at 12% | -98200 | 28330.71 | 28058.04 | 18884.95 | 12342.78 | 6809.122 | 56256.32 |
NPV | 52481.923 |
AAPL-E-- Highest annual operating cost to net a NPV of $1 is 89274.9 (in '000 $) | |||||||
Year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
Addl.revenue due to expansion | 105000 | 105000 | 105000 | 97000 | 88000 | 88000 | |
Addl.operating costs(excl.depn.) | -89274.9 | -89274.9 | -89274.9 | -89274.9 | -89274.9 | -89274.9 | |
Depreciation(DEP) | -23826 | -32490 | -10830 | -5054 | 0 | 0 | |
EBIT(or opg.inc.) | -8100.922 | -16764.9 | 4895.078 | 2671.078 | -1274.92 | -1274.92 | |
Taxes on opg. Inc. | 3240.3689 | 6705.969 | -1958.03 | -1068.43 | 509.9689 | 509.9689 | |
After-tax project opg. Inc.(OI) | -4860.553 | -10059 | 2937.047 | 1602.647 | -764.953 | -764.953 | |
Opg. Cash flow(OI+DEP) | 18965.447 | 22431.05 | 13767.05 | 6656.647 | -764.953 | -764.953 | |
Recovery of W/c | 98200 | ||||||
Salvage after-tax | 840 | ||||||
Project net cash flows | |||||||
(opg.+non-opg.) | -98200 | 18965.447 | 22431.05 | 13767.05 | 6656.647 | -764.953 | 98275.05 |
NPV(Excel fn.) | 0.001 | ||||||
Verification of NPV as per Excel | |||||||
PV F at 12% | 1 | 0.8928571 | 0.797194 | 0.71178 | 0.635518 | 0.567427 | 0.506631 |
PV at 12% | -98200 | 16933.435 | 17881.89 | 9799.112 | 4230.419 | -434.055 | 49789.2 |
NPV | 0.001 |
AAPL-F (other assumptions as in E | |||||||
Cost of capital | 26.65% | ||||||
b. Project's net Time 0 Cash flows | |||||||
Total initial outlay | -72200 | ||||||
Net change in w/c | -26000 | ||||||
Total time 0 cash flows | -98200 | ||||||
Year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
Addl.revenue due to expansion | 105000 | 105000 | 105000 | 97000 | 88000 | 88000 | |
Addl.operating costs(excl.depn.) | -68000.0 | -68000 | -68000 | -68000 | -68000 | -68000 | |
Depreciation(DEP) | -23826 | -32490 | -10830 | -5054 | 0 | 0 | |
EBIT(or opg.inc.) | 13174 | 4510 | 26170 | 23946 | 20000 | 20000 | |
Taxes on opg. Inc. | -5269.6 | -1804 | -10468 | -9578 | -8000 | -8000 | |
After-tax project opg. Inc.(OI) | 7904.4 | 2706 | 15702 | 14368 | 12000 | 12000 | |
Opg. Cash flow(OI+DEP) | 31730.4 | 35196 | 26532 | 19422 | 12000 | 12000 | |
Recovery of W/c | 98200 | ||||||
Salvage after-tax | 840 | ||||||
Project net cash flows | |||||||
(opg.+non-opg.) | -98200 | 31730.4 | 35196 | 26532 | 19422 | 12000 | 111040 |
NPV(Excel fn.) | 0.000 | ||||||
IRR | |||||||
Verification of NPV as per Excel | |||||||
PV F at 26.65% | 1 | 0.7895776 | 0.623433 | 0.492249 | 0.388668 | 0.306884 | 0.242309 |
PV at 26.65% | -98200 | 25053.612 | 21942.34 | 13060.34 | 7548.562 | 3682.606 | 26905.95 |
NPV | -6.595 |
IRR=26.65%
Apple Inc.: Capital Budgeting Analysis Apple Inc. (ticker: AAPL) is considering installing a new and highly...
You just finished a capital budgeting investment analysis on a $198 million project. The project's life is 12 years and it will generate equal annual after-tax cash operating cash flows of $33.05 million. You assumed a $55 million salvage value, but the projecť's adjusted tax basis at termination will be $66 million. The project would have no effect on net working capital. With a 22% marginal tax rate, the resulting NPV is $41.628 million. What cost of capital did you...
Ch 13: Selected End-of-Chapter Problems - Capital Budgeting: Estimating Cash eBook Problem Walk-Through New-Project Analysis The president of the company you work for has asked you to evaluate the proposed acquisition of a new chromatograph for the firm's RAD department. The equipment's basic price is $75,000, and it would cost another $17.500 to modify it for special use by your firm. The chromatograph, which falls into the MACRS 3-year class, would be sold after 3 years for $27,400. The MACRS...
TEGRATED CASE ALLIED FOOD PRODUCTS CAPITAL BUDGETING AND CASH FLOW ESTIMATION Allied Food Products is considering expanding into the fruit juice business with a new fresh lemon juice product. Assume that you were recently hired as assistant to the director of capital budgeting, and you must evaluate the new project. The lemon juice would be produced in an unused building adjacent to Allied's Fort Myers plant: Allied owns the building, which is fully depreciated. The required equipment would cost $200,000,...
DCF analysis doesn't always lead to proper capital budgeting decisions because capital budgeting projects are not-Select-investments like stocks and bonds. Managers can often take positive actions after the investment has been made to alter a project's cash flows. These opportunities are real options that offer the right but not the obligation to take some future action. Types of real options include abandonment, investment timing, expansion, output flexibility, and input flexibility. The existence of options can -Select projects' expected profitability,-Select their...
A company is evaluating the purchase of a machine to improve product quality and output levels. The new machine would cost $1.6 million and would be depreciated for tax purposes using the straight-line method over an estimated six-year life to its expected salvage value of $100,000. The new machine would require an addition of $70,000 to working capital at the beginning of the project, which will of course be returned to the firm at the end of the project. In...
Cash flows estimation and capital budgeting: You are the head of finance department in XYZ Company. You are considering adding a new machine to your production facility. The new machine’s base price is $10,000.00, and it would cost another $2,280.00 to install it. The machine falls into the MACRS 3-year class (the applicable MACRS depreciation rates are 33.33%, 44.45%, 14.81%, and 7.41%), and it would be sold after three years for $1,850.00. The machine would require an increase in net...
New-Project Analysis The Campbell Company is considering adding a robotic paint sprayer to its production line. The sprayer's base price is $810,000, and it would cost another $23,000 to install it. The machine falls into the MACRS 3-year class (the applicable MACRS depreciation rates are 33.33%, 44.45%, 14.81%, and 7.41%), and it would be sold after 3 years for $628,000. The machine would require an increase in net working capital (inventory) of $19,500. The sprayer would not change revenues, but...
(Consider using an Excel Spreadsheet to solve this problem.) Blueberry Farms Inc. is considering a four-year project to grow new and higher-quality blueberries. An initial investment of $20 million depreciable straight-line to zero over the project's life will buy the equipment necessary to get the project off the ground. The net working capital will also require an initial investment of $2.2 million to support the planting inventory; this cost is fully recoverable whenever the project ends. In the company's opinion,...
New-Project Analysis The Campbell Company is considering adding a robotic paint sprayer to its production line. The sprayer's base price is $1,040,000, and it would cost another $20,500 to install it. The machine falls into the MACRS 3-year class, and it would be sold after 3 years for $535,000. The MACRS rates for the first three years are 0.3333, 0.4445, and 0.1481. The machine would require an increase in net working capital (inventory) of $13,000. The sprayer would not change...
New-Project Analysis The Campbell Company is considering adding a robotic paint sprayer to its production line. The sprayer's base price is $1,050,000, and it would cost another $17,000 to install it. The machine falls into the MACRS 3-year class, and it would be sold after 3 years for $630,000. The MACRS rates for the first three years are 0.3333, 0.4445, and 0.1481. The machine would require an increase in net working capital (inventory) of $19,000. The sprayer would not change...