How do U.S. GAAP and IFRS differ with regard to reporting prior service costs?
Please give a detailed explanation of the question.
The IFRS and the U.S. GAAP both report prior service cost a bit different. Both the IFRS and the U.S. GAAP recognized the initial deferral of the pensions gain and losses as part of the OCI.The OCI is then closed and transferred to the Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI), where it is the reported in the Equity section of the balance sheet (Watson, 2011). Here is where the IFRS and the U.S. GAAP vary in treatment of the reporting of the prior service cost.Under the IFRS the deferred net pension gains or losses just stays in AOCI forever, while the U.S. GAAP utilizes a corridor approach. A corridor approach requires the disclosure of a pension actuarial gains or losses. This approach as a limit of 10%, which if exceeded allows the,access of the actuarial gains or losses to be amortized gradually, over time of the service, into the income statement.
How do U.S. GAAP and IFRS differ with regard to reporting prior service costs? Please give...
How do IFRS rules differ from U.S. GAAP (if at all). How would the reporting of stock dividend change under using IFRS rules?
With regard to reporting of contingent liabilities, U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) differ in defining the term "probable". Which of the following is correct with regard to defining "probable"? Multiple Choice Under IFRS, "probable" means the chance of an event occurring is slight. Under U.S. GAAP, "probable" means the chance of an event occurring is slight but less than likely. Under IFRS, "probable" means an event is more likely than not to occur. Under U.S. GAAP, "probable"...
Which of the following is true with regard to pension accounting under U.S. GAAP and IFRS? Prior service cost is recognized on the balance sheet under both U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Accounting for defined-benefit pensions is typically a less important issue in the U. S. than in other parts of the world. The accounting for defined-benefit pension plans is the same under U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The accounting for defined contribution p
How do U.S. GAAP and IFRS differ in their use of present values when measuring contingent liabilities? (explain) Can presently accruing pension funds be parlayed into other investments like real estate, securities, or the likes? (explain with example)
Which of the following is true with regard to pension accounting under GAAP and IFRS? Group of answer choices The accounting for defined-benefit pension plans is the same under GAAP and IFRS. Accounting for defined-benefit pensions is typically a less important issue in the U. S. than in other parts of the world. Prior service cost is recognized on the balance sheet under both GAAP and IFRS. Prior service cost is amortized into income over the expected service lives of...
Which statement is true concerning U.S. GAAP versus IFRS reporting for business combinations? A. U. S. GAAP and IFRS both require capitalization of in-process R&D as an identifiable intangible asset. B. U.S. GAAP and IFRS both require all asset and liability valuation corrections to be reported in income. C. U.S. GAAP requires recognition of an earnout as part of initial acquisition cost, while IFRS requires an earnout to be recorded only when it is paid. D. U.S. GAAP expenses consulting...
How does U.S. GAAP require prior service costs related to retirees to be recognized amortize over remaining expected life of the retirees or recognize immediately?
Discuss the major similarities and differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Which of the differences do you find most interesting?If there is a convergence between U.S. GAAP and IFRS, would you choose the U.S. GAAP or IFRS method? Why?
How does IFRS differ from GAAP with respect to writing off receivables?
HolmesWatson (HW) is considering what the effect would be of reporting its liabilities under IFRS rather than U.S. GAAP. The following facts apply: a. HW is defending against a lawsuit and believes it is virtually certain to lose in court. If it loses the lawsuit, management estimates it will need to pay a range of damages that falls between $6,800,000 and $11,800,000, with each amount in that range equally likely. b. HW is defending against another lawsuit that is identical...