Question 1.
Is the following argument valid or invalid?
It’s often good to give to charity.
If it’s often good to give to charity, then the Earth is round.
∴ The Earth is round.
Question 2.
Is the following argument valid or invalid?
If Ruldoph's nose is shiny, then it is reflective
Ruldoph's nose is not shiny
∴ Ruldoph's nose is reflective
Question 1. Is the following argument valid or invalid? It’s often good to give to charity....
For the following questions, (i) formalize the argument, (ii) construct and complete a truth table, and (iii) evaluate that truth table. For your evaluation, determine whether the argument is a tautology, contingent, or contradictory, and decide whether it is valid or invalid. Please interpret disjunctions exclusively If an android is rational, then it’s conscious, and if it’s conscious, then it has reflective mental activity. But no android has reflective mental activity, so it’s not rational.
logic V. Determine whether the following argument is valid or invalid and show that it is using either an example or a derivation. (10 points) 1. -C-(AVB) 2. ~(CVA) - B
Use Euler diagrams to determine whether the following argument is valid or invalid. Some factors of 6 are factors of 10 All factors of 10 are factors of 70. . Some factors of 6 are factors of 70. Is the syllogism valid or invalid? The syllogism is invalid The syllogism is valid Click to select your answer
Using the imagination test, determine whether the following argument is valid or invalid: Some basketball players are fast. Some basketball players are strong. Therefore, some basketball players are both fast and strong. invalid valid
Given this 2D array, which of the following statements are valid or invalid to use? String[][] a = {{“It’s”, “always”, “a”, “hassle”}, {“converting”, “to”, “Celsius”}}; //valid or invalid? a[1][2] = a[2][1]; a[1][0] = a[0][1]; a[-1][0] = a[1][0]; a[0][3] = a[1][3]; a[0][2] = a[1][1];
QUESTION 2 Determine whether the following argument is valid using the long or short truth-table method. Premise 1 If Angela is hungry, she eats pizza. Premise 2 Angela is not eating pizza. Therefore, Angela is not hungry. The above argument is a) valid b) invalid
1. Determine whether or not the following argument is valid or invalid. Show your work, clearly explaining how you determined its validity or invalidity. You may justify your answer either by use of a truth table or by citing or known valid argument forms or fallacies. Justifications that appeal to common sense, which are based on opinion or perceptions, or which otherwise do not analyse the underlying logic will not be accepted. THE ARGUMENT: If you have just cause why...
Check the following argument for Validity: No children are good kids. Some good kids do not steal. Therefore, some children steal. Group of answer choices Valid Invalid, two negative premises Invalid, four terms Invalid, undistributed middle
Question 109 (1 point) If the sculpture is not a forgery, then it’s worth a small fortune. Therefore, the sculpture is not a forgery, since it’s worth a small fortune. Question 109 options: Inductive, invalid Inductive, sound Deductive, strong Deductive, invalid Deductive, weak Deductive, valid Inductive, strong Inductive, weak Deductive, uncogent In the following problems please identify the arguments as either inductive or deductive, and then choose the assessment that applies best to it. E.g. All canoes are boats. No...