ZuoTi.Pro
Question

Belicek made a number of disposals during the tax year 2016/17. Which one of the following...

Belicek made a number of disposals during the tax year 2016/17. Which one of the following disposals would be a chargeable disposal for capital gains tax purposes?

A. Sale of a racehorse. The market value of the racehorse was £25,000, but Belicek agreed to a selling price of £24,000. The racehorse was acquired by Belicek at a cost of £11,000.

B. Gift to a friend of an antique vase worth £1,000,000. The vase was acquired by Belicek at a cost of £700,000.

C. Gift to a charity of £32,000 in National Savings Certificates

D. Sale of Belicek’s principal private residence

business   accounting   
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Next > < Previous
Sort answers by oldest

Homework Answers

Answer #1

A) sale of race horce is taxable

Capital gain=sale value - cost of acquisition

=24000-11000

=13000

B)gift to any person from any person taxed in the hands of

Receipeint at fair market value.

C) Gift to charity is not taxable.

D) sale of residential house is tax free if those funds invested in another residential house as per 54b or in specified bonds as per 54ec

0 0
Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Belicek made a number of disposals during the tax year 2016/17. Which one of the following...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions

  • Section A Answer ALL questions 1. Which one of the following would not be a chargeable...

    Section A Answer ALL questions 1. Which one of the following would not be a chargeable person for capital gains tax purposes? a) b) c) d) A registered charity Individuals who are resident in the UK The trustees of a trust or settlement The personal representatives of a deceased person 2. Giants Ltd sold one quarter of a parcel of land for £200,000 in June 2014. The land was bought for £500,000 in May 2010. The remainder was valued at...

  • Tax Return Project

    Note: This problem is for the 2019 tax year.David R. and Ella M. Cole (ages 39 and 38, respectively) are husband and wife who live at 1820 Elk Avenue, Denver, CO 80202. David is a self-employed consultant specializing in retail management, and Ella is a dental hygienist for a chain of dental clinics.David earned consulting fees of $145,000 in 2019. He maintains his own office and pays for all business expenses. The Coles are adequately covered by the medical plan...

  • Note: This problem is for the 2018 tax year. Devon Bishop, age 45, is single. He lives at 1507 Rose Lane, Albuquerque, NM 87131. His Social Security number is 111-11-1112. Devon does not want $3 to...

    Note: This problem is for the 2018 tax year. Devon Bishop, age 45, is single. He lives at 1507 Rose Lane, Albuquerque, NM 87131. His Social Security number is 111-11-1112. Devon does not want $3 to go to the Presidential Election Campaign Fund. Devon's wife, Ariane, passed away in 2014. Devon's son, Tom, who is age 18, resides with Devon. Tom's Social Security number is 123-45-6788. Devon owns a sole proprietorship for which he uses the accrual method of accounting...

  • Gleim 6 Deductions from AGI [1] Which one of the following expenses does not qualify as...

    Gleim 6 Deductions from AGI [1] Which one of the following expenses does not qualify as a deductible medical expense? A. Cost of long-term care for a developmentally disabled person in a relative’s home. B. Special school for a deaf child to learn lip reading. C. Cost of elevator installed for individual who had heart bypass surgery (in excess of increase in value of individual’s home). D. Cost and care of guide dogs used by a blind person in his...

  • Read the following Hornung v. Commissioner, 47 T.C. 428 (1967), which involves the constructive receipt doctrine...

    Read the following Hornung v. Commissioner, 47 T.C. 428 (1967), which involves the constructive receipt doctrine and how it was used to determine the year of inclusion in taxable income. How does the constructive receipt doctrine impact a cash-basis individual’s taxable income? What factors could have resulted in a different determination? 47 T.C. 428 (1967) PAUL V. HORNUNG, PETITIONER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Docket No. 3740-64. United States Tax Court. Filed January 27, 1967. 429*429 Michael J. Clare,...

  • Read the following Hornung v. Commissioner, 47 T.C. 428 (1967), which involves the constructive receipt doctrine...

    Read the following Hornung v. Commissioner, 47 T.C. 428 (1967), which involves the constructive receipt doctrine and how it was used to determine the year of inclusion in taxable income and answer both question. How does the constructive receipt doctrine impact a cash-basis individual’s taxable income? What factors could have resulted in a different determination? 47 T.C. 428 (1967) PAUL V. HORNUNG, PETITIONER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Docket No. 3740-64. United States Tax Court. Filed January 27, 1967....

  • Comprehensive Income Tax Course: Module 1 4. Randy turned 16 last year and had his first...

    Comprehensive Income Tax Course: Module 1 4. Randy turned 16 last year and had his first summer job. Even though his parents are claiming him as a dependent he wants to file a return in order to get his refund. He receives his W-2 and decides he can do his own return using form 1040-EZ. Which of the following information is not found on a Form W-2? a) The taxpayer’s Social Security number b) The taxpayer’s wages, tips and other...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT