Question

Patricia Eklund, controller in the division of social services for the state, recognizes the importance of the budgetary process for planning, control, and motivational purposes. She believes that a properly implemented participative budgetary process for planning purposes and an evaluation procedure will motivate the managers to improve productivity within their particular departments. Based upon this philosophy, Eklund has implemented the following budgetary procedures. • An appropriation target figure is given to each department manager. This amount is the maximum funding that each department can expect to receive in the next year. • Department managers develop their individual budgets within the following spending constraints as directed by the controller’s staff. ■ Case 9–46 Participative Budgeting (LO 9-2, 9-3, 9-9) Chapter 9 Financial Planning and Analysis: The Master Budget 413 ◦ Expenditure requests cannot exceed the appropriation target. ◦ All fixed expenditures should be included in the budget. Fixed expenditures would include such items as contracts and salaries at current levels. ◦ All government projects directed by higher authority should be included in the budget in their entirety. • The controller’s staff consolidates the budget requests from the various departments into a master budget submission for the entire division. • Upon final budget approval by the legislature, the controller’s staff allocates the appropriation to the various departments on instructions from the division manager. However, a specified percentage of each department’s appropriation is held back in anticipation of potential budget cuts and special funding needs. The amount and use of this contingency fund is left to the discretion of the division manager. • Each department is allowed to adjust its budget when necessary to operate within the reduced appropriation level. However, as stated in the original directive, specific projects authorized by higher authority must remain intact. • The final budget is used as the basis of control. Excessive expenditures by account for each department are highlighted on a monthly basis. Department managers are expected to account for all expenditures over budget. Fiscal responsibility is an important factor in the overall performance evaluation of department managers. Eklund believes her policy of allowing the department managers to participate in the budgetary process and then holding them accountable for their performance is essential, especially during times of limited resources. She further believes that the department managers will be positively motivated to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of their departments because they have provided input into the initial budgetary process and are required to justify any unfavorable performances. Required: 1. Describe several operational and behavioral benefits that are generally attributed to a participative budgetary process. 2. Identify at least four deficiencies in Patricia Eklund’s participative policy for planning and performance evaluation purposes. For each deficiency identified, recommend how it can be corrected.

Answer 1

For the above asked question refer below images for the precise and detailed solution.
Several operationa and behavioral 0: Describe benefits ional ave generally to a partica patory altributed that are budgetary pracess. beha vioval benefits Some of the and opevational Answer:- partíci patory follows :- that to a are genevally attributed budgeting process are as best Iknowledge of in a . Utilization of the Specific area, to darly operations. Gctivities because close the pavtiepants ave that Goals and realistic a cceptable · are more and Improved cohesiveness. Commoni cation g roop to be held willing ness Commitment and Sense of for the budget accountable

® I dentify at least poltcy for four deficiencies in patvicia Eiclund's planning and deficency identifred participative e valua tion pes for mance each Arposes it can For how recommend be Corrected. Answer:- for planning S performance e valua tHon, along with Four deficiencies in patvicra Eulond's polkicy pavtici pative recommen dations corrected : how deficiencies Can be of the Deticiencies Recommendations I' The Seting of lonstvaints on fixed espenditures inclodes uncontvolla ble fixed costs, thereby mitigating poritive effects of jartic patory budgering . based on Rewards Should be meeting budget and /or organizationd goals cor) objectives : the 2. The axbitvayy vevision of approved The Contingency budget Should be budgets, defeats the partiipatory each Sepavate , over and above de partment's oviginal Sobmission . process 3. The division manager holds back a percentage oft each budget for discsetionary ose. Managers Should be involued in the revision of bodgets Manageys could at prg yams bud get Sobmit a with different ĭevel of fonding. 4. Evatuation based on performance most be a (com panied rewards. budget Divisional Constraints could be Commonicated budget at with intrinsic "Kick -off" : however, meeting; individual limits of contrallable Set by expenses Should be each manager 1