HOMEWORKLIB RULES:
THANK YOU
Assume prior belief suggests that a car averages ,1 30 mpg with ơ-1 mpg. The last...
Assume prior belief suggests that a car averages 30 mpg with ơ-1 mpg. The last 5 fill-ups had the following mpgs: 25, 26, 30, 22, 20. Let the random variable X represent the actual mpg of the car. Using Bayes law address the following: 1. "Solve" for P(x observations), leaving the denominator unsolved. 2. In excel plot the distribution P(xlobservations) for -15,16,17,... ,38, 39,40 3. Which values of x maximizes P(observations)? Accordingly, what is the most likely mpg?
Assume prior belief suggests that a car averages 1-30 mpg with ơ-1 mpg. The last 5 fill-ups had the following mpgs: 25, 26, 30, 22, 20. Let the random variable X represent the actual mpg of the car. Using Bayes law address the following: 1. "Solve" for P(xlobservations), leaving the denominator unsolved.
A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge award significant damages for the mere fact of an employee's dismissal, or for the stigma that that dismissal brings? Or for the employer thereafter competing with the ex-employee for the clients, before the ex-employee has got a new job? B. Basic Facts [2] This is an appeal from 2009 ABQB 591 (CanLII), 473 A.R. 254. [3] Usually a judgment recites facts before law. But...