CASH FLOW FOR BORROW AND BUY OPTION | |||||||||
Equipment Cost | $9,700,000 | ||||||||
Borrowed amount | $2,900,000 | ||||||||
Initial Cash Flow (Year 0) | ($6,800,000) | (9700000-2900000) | |||||||
Annual Depreciation =9700000/5= | $1,940,000 | ||||||||
INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL REPAYMENT ON AMOUNT BORROWED | |||||||||
Pv | Amount Borrowed | $2,900,000 | |||||||
Nper | Number of years of repayment | 5 | |||||||
Rate | Interest Rate | 9% | |||||||
PMT | Annual repayment in five equal instalments | $745,568 | (Using PMT function of excelwith Rate=9%,Nper=5, Pv=-2900000 | ||||||
REPAYMENT SCHEDULE | |||||||||
Year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||||
A | Beginning Balance | $2,900,000 | $2,415,432 | $1,887,253 | $1,311,537 | $684,007 | |||
B | Amount of annual payment | $745,568 | $745,568 | $745,568 | $745,568 | $745,568 | |||
C=A*9% | Interest | $261,000 | $217,389 | $169,853 | $118,038 | $61,561 | |||
D=B-C | Principal | $484,568 | $528,179 | $575,715 | $627,530 | $684,007 | |||
E=A-D | Ending Balance | $2,415,432 | $1,887,253 | $1,311,537 | $684,007 | $0 | |||
Annual Savings | $2,900,000 | ||||||||
N | Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
a | Initial Cash Flow | ($6,800,000) | |||||||
Annual Cash Inflows: | |||||||||
.(1) | Annual Savings | $2,900,000 | $2,900,000 | $2,900,000 | $2,900,000 | $2,900,000 | |||
,(2) | Interest Cost for amount borrowed | -$261,000 | -$217,389 | -$169,853 | -$118,038 | -$61,561 | |||
.(3) | Depreciation expense | -$1,940,000 | -$1,940,000 | -$1,940,000 | -$1,940,000 | -$1,940,000 | |||
.(5)=(1)+(2)+(3) | Earning Before Interest and Taxes(EBIT) | $699,000 | $742,611 | $790,147 | $841,962 | $898,439 | |||
Taxes(34%) | -$237,660 | -$252,488 | -$268,650 | -$286,267 | -$305,469 | ||||
Net Income/(Loss) | $461,340 | $490,123 | $521,497 | $555,695 | $592,970 | ||||
Add back depreciation | $1,940,000 | $1,940,000 | $1,940,000 | $1,940,000 | $1,940,000 | ||||
b | Total Operating Cash Flow | $2,401,340 | $2,430,123 | $2,461,497 | $2,495,695 | $2,532,970 | |||
c | Cash flow for repayment of principal | -$484,568 | -$528,179 | -$575,715 | -$627,530 | -$684,007 | |||
CF=a+b+c | PROJECT NET CASH FLOW | -$6,800,000 | $1,916,772 | $1,901,944 | $1,885,782 | $1,868,165 | $1,848,963 | ||
After tax interest =9*(1-0.34)= | 5.9% | SUM | |||||||
PV=CF/(1.059^N) | Present Value of Cash Flow | -$6,800,000 | $1,809,983 | $1,695,922 | $1,587,828 | $1,485,359 | $1,388,188 | $1,167,280 | |
Net Present Value | $1,167,280 | ||||||||
CASH FLOW FOR LEASE OPTION | |||||||||
N | Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
.(1) | Annual Lease Payment | ($2,150,000) | ($2,150,000) | ($2,150,000) | ($2,150,000) | ($2,150,000) | |||
.(2) | Annual Savings | $2,900,000 | $2,900,000 | $2,900,000 | $2,900,000 | $2,900,000 | |||
.(3)=.(1)+.(2) | Earning Before Interest and Taxes(EBIT) | ($2,150,000) | $750,000 | $750,000 | $750,000 | $750,000 | $2,900,000 | ||
a=.(3)*34% | Taxes(34%) | $731,000 | ($255,000) | ($255,000) | ($255,000) | ($255,000) | ($986,000) | ||
b=.(3)+a | Net Income/(Loss) | ($1,419,000) | $495,000 | $495,000 | $495,000 | $495,000 | $1,914,000 | ||
CF=b | PROJECT NET CASH FLOW | -$1,419,000 | $495,000 | $495,000 | $495,000 | $495,000 | $1,914,000 | SUM | |
PV=CF/(1.059^N) | Present Value of Cash Flow | -$1,419,000 | $467,422 | $441,381 | $416,790 | $393,569 | $1,437,018 | $1,737,180 | |
Net Present Value | $1,737,180 | ||||||||
LEASE OPTION has higher NPV | |||||||||
New Oil should choose LEASE OPTION | |||||||||
b | Maximum Lease payment | ||||||||
N | Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
.(1) | Annual Lease Payment | ($2,343,000) | ($2,343,000) | ($2,343,000) | ($2,343,000) | ($2,343,000) | |||
.(2) | Annual Savings | $2,900,000 | $2,900,000 | $2,900,000 | $2,900,000 | $2,900,000 | |||
.(3)=.(1)+.(2) | Earning Before Interest and Taxes(EBIT) | ($2,343,000) | $557,000 | $557,000 | $557,000 | $557,000 | $2,900,000 | ||
a=.(3)*34% | Taxes(34%) | $796,620 | ($189,380) | ($189,380) | ($189,380) | ($189,380) | ($986,000) | ||
b=.(3)+a | Net Income/(Loss) | ($1,546,380) | $367,620 | $367,620 | $367,620 | $367,620 | $1,914,000 | ||
CF=b | PROJECT NET CASH FLOW | -$1,546,380 | $367,620 | $367,620 | $367,620 | $367,620 | $1,914,000 | SUM | |
PV=CF/(1.059^N) | Present Value of Cash Flow | -$1,546,380 | $347,139 | $327,799 | $309,536 | $292,291 | $1,437,018 | $1,167,402 | |
Net Present Value | $1,167,402 | ||||||||
MaximumLEASE Payment | $2,343,000 | ||||||||
|
New Oil Co. is considering replacement of their highly specialised drilling equipment. The new equipment is...
The Wildcat Oil Company is trying to decide whether to lease or buy a new computer-assisted drilling system for its oil exploration business. Management has decided that it must use the system to stay competitive; it will provide $2.3 million in annual pretax cost savings. The system costs $8.2 million and will be depreciated straight-line to zero over five years. Wildcat's tax rate is 24 percent, and the firm can borrow at 6 percent. Lambert Leasing Company is willing to...
The Wildcat Oil Company is trying to decide whether to lease or buy a new computer-assisted drilling system for its oil exploration business. Management has decided that it must use the system to stay competitive; it will provide $3.7 million in annual pretax cost savings. The system costs $8.8 million and will be depreciated straight-line to zero over its five-year life, after which it will be worthless. Wildcat’s tax rate is 22 percent and the firm can borrow at 9...
The Wildcat Oil Company is trying to decide whether to lease or buy a new computer-assisted drilling system for its oil exploration business. Management has decided that it must use the system to stay competitive; it will provide $2.4 million in annual pretax cost savings. The system costs $9.4 million and will be depreciated straight-line to zero over its five-year life. Wildcat’s tax rate is 34 percent, and the firm can borrow at 8 percent. Lambert Leasing Company has offered...
The Wildcat Oil Company is trying to decide whether to lease or buy a new computer-assisted drilling system for its oil exploration business. Management has decided that it must use the system to stay competitive; it will provide $3.4 million in annual pretax cost savings. The system costs $7.5 million and will be depreciated straight-line to zero over five years. Wildcat's tax rate is 24 percent, and the firm can borrow at 8 percent. Lambert Leasing Company has offered to...
The Wildcat Oil Company is trying to decide whether to lease or buy a new computer-assisted drilling system for its oil exploration business. Management has decided that it must use the system to stay competitive; it will provide $2.4 million in annual pretax cost savings. The system costs $7.1 million and will be depreciated straight-line to zero over five years. Wildcat's tax rate is 23 percent, and the firm can borrow at 8 percent. Lambert Leasing Company has offered to...
The Wildcat Oil Company is trying to decide whether to lease or buy a new computer- assisted drilling system for its oil exploration business. Management has decided that it must use the system to stay competitive; it will provide $3.1 million in annual pretax cost savings. The system costs $8.1 million and will be depreciated straight-line to zero over five years. Wildcat's tax rate is 21 percent and the firm can borrow at 6 percent. Lambert's policy is to require...
The Wildcat Oil Company is trying to decide whether to lease or buy a new computer-assisted drilling system for its oil exploration business. Management has decided that it must use the system to stay competitive; it will provide $3.3 million in annual pretax cost savings. The system costs $8.3 million and will be depreciated straight-line to zero over five years. Wildcat’s tax rate is 23 percent and the firm can borrow at 8 percent. Lambert’s policy is to require its...
Suppose Procter and Gamble (P&G) is considering purchasing $ 13 million in new manufacturing equipment. If it purchases the equipment, it will depreciate it on a straight-line basis over the five years, after which the equipment will be worthless. It will also be responsible for maintenance expenses of $ 0.50 million per year. Alternatively, it can lease the equipment for $ 3.0 million per year for the five years, in which case the lessor will provide necessary maintenance. Assume P&G?s...
Suppose Procter and Gamble (P&G) is considering purchasing $20 million in new manufacturing equipment. If it purchases the equipment, it will depreciate it on a straight-line basis over the five years, after which the equipment will be worthless. It will also be responsible for maintenance expenses of $1.25 million per year. Alternatively, it can lease the equipment for $4.6 million per year for the five years, in which case the lessor will provide necessary maintenance. Assume P&G?s tax rate is...
per tax = 12 % Chapter 27 3. ABC, Inc. needs some new equipment. The equipment would cost $100,000 if purchased and would be depreciated straight-line over 5 years. No salvage is expected. Alternatively, the company can lease the equipment for $25,000 per year. The marginal tax rate is 40%. What is the net advantage to leasing (NAL)?