Question

Why does our system allow for two different types of lawsuits against one person for a similar action/outcome? Is this fair? Does our current legal system make a medical expert hesitant to help in situations outside of a medical facility, or while “off-duty?”

Answer 1

A "class action" lawsuit is one in which a group of people with the same or similar injuries caused by the same product or action sue the defendant as a group. Different names for claims brought by various individuals who endured comparable mischief or misfortunes are "mass tort prosecution" and "multi-area case" ("MDL").

two different types of lawsuits against one person for a similar action/outcome?

Benefits of Class Actions

The class action lawsuit brings together and disposes of thousands of claims at one time that are impractical to litigate individually, making the process much more efficient.

The judge chooses the essential inquiry of who wins with respect to the whole gathering. On the off chance that the litigant wins, the class claim is rejected and the people in the gathering are restricted from documenting new or singular claims over a similar issue against a similar respondent. On the off chance that the class of offended parties wins, the court finds the respondent obligated for the offended parties' wounds, and the measure of recuperation is later isolated among the offended parties.

Since it totals little cases, the class activity design brings down the frequently staggering expense of case.

Class Action Judgments

In a class action, the court's decision applies to every participant who has opted into the class.

All people who fit inside the court's unique meaning of a class part are bound by the last court choice, regardless of whether they never really go to court or generally take an interest in the claim.

Installment to the members in the class activity typically pursues a "plan of conveyance." With the assistance of the gatherings and their lawyers, the judge builds up the arrangement to appropriate the sum that the offended party class won in the claim less the lawyers' charges and case costs. Every individual from the class may get certain level of the aggregate sum support, or may get a specific dollar figure. Now and again, the lawyers look for and acquire consent for an individualized, inside and out audit of every member's case, in order to tailor the sum granted to each class part to the "esteem" of his or her case. This technique is moderately uncommon, notwithstanding, particularly in huge class activities.

Does our current legal system make a medical expert hesitant to help in situations outside of a medical facility, or while “off-duty?”

First of all, a doctor or physician must owe a duty to their patient before they can be held liable for giving medical treatment while off-duty.

In the U.S., a specialist has no positive obligation to give medicinal help to harmed people on the off chance that they have not set up an extraordinary association with the person.

Along these lines, for instance, if a specialist is on leave having a feast in an eatery and a man is harmed, they don't really have an obligation to help that individual. On the off chance that the specialist keeps eating their dinner, the harmed individual does not have a medicinal misbehavior guarantee against the specialist, regardless of whether they are hurt. This is on account of no exceptional relationship has framed yet between the harmed individual and the specialist.

Then again, assume that the on furlough specialist energetically and intentionally volunteers to help the harmed individual. Now a specialist understanding relationship has been framed. The specialist may then wind up at risk if their restorative help additionally harms the patient (for instance, on the off chance that they were careless amid treatment). Or on the other hand, they may end up at risk on the off chance that they volunteer help and after that surrender the treatment later.