Question

Bond rating agencies have invested significant sums of money in an effort to determine which quantitative...

Bond rating agencies have invested significant sums of money in an effort to determine which quantitative and nonquantitative factors best predict bond defaults. Furthermore, some of the raters invest time and money to meet privately with corporate personnel to get nonpublic information that is used in assigning the issues bond rating. To recoup those costs, some bond rating agencies have tied their ratings to the purchase of additional services. Do you believe that this is an acceptable practice? Defend your position. Your initial posting should be 250-500 words and must be submitted by Thursday, midnight, of this week.

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Answer

In my opinion, this practice is not acceptable because the bonds are rated at the time they are issues

Credit agencies or Bond rating agencies should be impartial and have absolutely no links with the company. The question of investing time and money does't arise to get the non-public information. In order to get their costs back many agencies have tied up with corporates to get their additional costs back by giving them a fair rating. Degradinng Bond Rating is not an acceptable practice: 1. Bond raters or credit agencies meet top corporate personnel and ideally they should have absolutely no links with the company.
Rating agency who have access to Confidential Information are not permitted to use or share that information for
purposes of trading securities (such as Moody’s stock) or for any other purpose except the conduct of rating business.
Insider trading (or dealing) laws and regulations globally prohibit buying or selling a company’s securities while in
possession of Material Non-Public Information about that company.
Material Non-Public Information to another person if, as a result, that person – or any other person – buys or sells a
security while aware of that information.
Information about a future rating action may be material, as may be the information disclosed to ratings teams by third parties during the course of the ratings process.
Questions regarding whether information is “Confidential,” “Material” or what restrictions exist on the use or distribution of such information should be directed to the Legal or Compliance Departments.
More detailed guidance regarding Material Non-Public and Confidential Information may be found in the during personal meeting

“Confidential Information” means any Non-Public Information .
Non-Public Information used for, or obtained from, a Rated Entity or its Agent for the purpose of determining
a Rating;

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Bond rating agencies have invested significant sums of money in an effort to determine which quantitative...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Bond rating agencies have invested significant sums of money in an effort to determine which quantitative...

    Bond rating agencies have invested significant sums of money in an effort to determine which quantitative and nonquantitative factors best predict bond defaults. Furthermore, some of the raters invest time and money to meet privately with corporate personnel to get nonpublic information that is used in assigning the issues bond rating. To recoup those costs, some bond rating agencies have tied their ratings to the purchase of additional services. Do you believe that this is an acceptable practice? Defend your...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT