Question

6. Provide a plausible reason for the differences in the infrared wavenumbers between each of the following pairs: a. Mo(PF),(CO),: 1991, 2040 cm versus Mo(PMez),(CO),: 1851, 1945 cm; b. Mn(n-CsHs)(CO): 1939, 2023 cm versus Mn(n-CsMes)(CO): 1928, 2017 cm '; C, Mo(PF) (CO) : 1991, 2040 cm" versus Mo(C6H (CHỊ))(CO) : 1902, 1974 cm.

Answer 1

Odk (a) Moll3,003 : 1491 2010 cret... EP poch? Hece Plz act ay & with boning group so attract from redal atom. 2 so, metal atam defficiency takes place for that redom from co Metal e are accepted so i-ċ bond stonghi decresses for and c-o bound strongsh increses- So Ear so cao frequeny increses, when compive with Mopme) Coz complex... Because prezi Ligand mois de donating group. CH Prz th March Mac Band stongth dr Soeriency's," et Bound stong in f forequency), CamScanner

Priesto M-C-band strongly f g also ? co ll i dr. I alsolya so Mo ( P o Show 1991, 2040 Cat. Mo pere),c0), - shaxs 1851, iqus connay Similarly - Mn mcg HS (C) 1939,2023 in this rest? with doowing compare to nicomes so that - ten mosted 6), Shows less IR fequency like 2928, 2017 Cred compare twith [ Mombascshoz coz © M.CPE) Cod +1981,200 ml MEFA Cub 603 PESE MACB College loc=0 MC Bound strength of Mo-c Bonds tough ↑ co Band stongth cro Bond stongth & co fosquency co-foquenay fc forquency I -c fosquency r. more co fequency less co fequency csoboe 1991,2010 CH! volves 1902, 1974 CamScanne