Question

25. An exculpatory clause is a contract clause which a places total responsibility for injury or damages to property on an in
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

25) Option B (Excuses a party from liability of his or her own negligence)

26) Option A ( Total agreement is void)

27) Option B ( will sometimes reform (modify) the agreement to make it read in reasonable manner

28) Option B (With right to rejection)

29) Option B (Be considered manifestation of assent)

30) Option A (Infant has no capacity to contract)

31) Option C (Written Proof)

32) Option B (Sale of a car)

33) Option A (Unilateral)

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
25. An exculpatory clause is a contract clause which a places total responsibility for injury or...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • The courts will presume that a written contract which appears complete on its face contains the...

    The courts will presume that a written contract which appears complete on its face contains the whole agreement and will not permit a party to add to or vary or contradict the written agreement. This is called the… parol evidence rule postal acceptance rule business judgment rule privity of contract rule An injunction is a…    court order requiring a person to fulfil their agreement under a contract remedy available where someone has benefited at the expense of someone else...

  • 44. Agreements under the “Statute of Frauds” must: a. be in writing b. be for under...

    44. Agreements under the “Statute of Frauds” must: a. be in writing b. be for under $100.00 c. be on legal paper d. be notarized e. all of the above f. a and d only 45. An “illegal agreement” is one that will not be enforced because it violates: a. mirror reflection rule b. statutory law c. mutual rescission d. discord and satisfaction e. all of the above 46. The “parole evidence rule” related to contracts may refer to: a....

  • The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the...

    The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the Washington state court system; i.e. the trial court of general jurisdiction, the intermediate appellate court, the state supreme court. 3. Remember, Washington is in the 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals. 4. Under both the Washington state and federal court system, there is one appeal as of right. Appeals to the Washington Supreme Court(in the state system), or to the U.S. Supreme Court in...

  • Assignment 4-1 Week One Multiple Choice & Short Answer Total 40 points BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Comedian/actress Rosie...

    Assignment 4-1 Week One Multiple Choice & Short Answer Total 40 points BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Comedian/actress Rosie O’Donnell was part of a breach of contract trial with Gruner & Jahr over the “Rosie” magazine. O’Donnell’s contract stated that she would hold the position of editorial director of the magazine, with control over the editorial process and editorial staff, subject only to the veto of the CEO of G&J. During trial, O’Donnell told the court that in the first run of the...

  • Which governmental entity has primary responsibility for enforcing claims of employment discrimination? Select one: a. The...

    Which governmental entity has primary responsibility for enforcing claims of employment discrimination? Select one: a. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission b. The National Labor Relations Board c. The United States Senate d. State attorney general's offices e. County prosecutors Question 22 Not yet answered Marked out of 1.00 Flag question Question text Corporations are required to hold shareholders' meetings at least: Select one: a. annually. b. every six months. c. twice a year, but they are not required to be...

  • Question 7 1.5 pts Which of these statements regarding misrepresentation in terms of the Contract and...

    Question 7 1.5 pts Which of these statements regarding misrepresentation in terms of the Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 is accurate? It is necessary to prove that the representor intended to mislead the representee. The representee cannot sue for a misrepresentation unless they have taken reasonable steps to investigate the truth of the statement but if they have not had the opportunity to investigate they may sue. It must be reasonable for the representee to have been induced to...

  • 1. Which of the following is true about a promissory estoppel? A) It is invoked in...

    1. Which of the following is true about a promissory estoppel? A) It is invoked in cases having incompetent parties. B) It permits a court to order enforcement of a contract that lacks consideration. C) It allows for a party to claim goods that were never paid for. D) It is invoked in cases that involve a promissory note. 2. Which of the following is true for a minor under the infancy doctrine? A) A minor is bound to the...

  • Question 39 (1 point) Beauty Shop Woes. When Janice went to work as a hair stylist...

    Question 39 (1 point) Beauty Shop Woes. When Janice went to work as a hair stylist in Rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with Rick whereby if she left, she would not work for another beauty shop within 50 miles for 2 years. Rick trained Janice in several new techniques. After nine months, Janice was offered a great job down the street at a new beauty shop, quit Rick, and had a number of customers follow her down...

  • d. Neither Wanamaker nor Anderson is liable on the contract since the seller was obli. pated...

    d. Neither Wanamaker nor Anderson is liable on the contract since the seller was obli. pated to ascertain Anderson's authority. has the right to regain possession of tomobile and to collect damages. Brian may sue and collect from either Rob- Inson or Ambrose Il Amorost must pay in damages, he will be entitled to Indemnification from Robin son. Ambron notllable for the wrongful Teposion of the wtomobile since he was obeying the direct order of Robinson 22. Under which of...

  • Case review for Alaska Packers Assoc. v Domenico (9th Circuit, 1902) Issue, Ruling, Application, Conclusion   ROSS, Circuit Judge. The libel in this case was based upon a contract alleged to have been...

    Case review for Alaska Packers Assoc. v Domenico (9th Circuit, 1902) Issue, Ruling, Application, Conclusion   ROSS, Circuit Judge. The libel in this case was based upon a contract alleged to have been entered into between the libelants and the appellant corporation on the 22d day of May, 1900, at Pyramid Harbor, Alaska, by which it is claimed the appellant promised to pay each of the libelants, among other things, the sum of $100 for services rendered and to be rendered....

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT