The correct answer is 1st option
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Present worth of alternative 1 = - $ 200,000 + $ 15,200 (P/A, 15%, 12 years) + $ 10,000 (P/F, 15%, 12 years)
Present worth of alternative 1 = - $ 200,000 + $ 15,200 5.420619 + $ 10,000 0.1869
Present worth of alternative 1 = - $ 115,737.59
Present worth of alternative 2 = - $ 184,000+ $ 31,900 (P/A, 15%, 12 years)
Present worth of alternative 2 = - $ 184,000+ $ 31,900 5.420619
Present worth of alternative 2 = - $ 11,082.25
Present worth of alternative 3 = - $ 152,000 + $ 35,900 (P/A, 15%, 12 years) + $ 15,000 (P/F, 15%, 12 years)
Present worth of alternative 3 = - $ 152,000 + $ 35,900 5.420619 + $ 15,000 0.1869
Present worth of alternative 3 = $ 45,403.72
Present worth of alternative 4 = - $ 100,000 + $ 41,500 (P/A, 15%, 12 years) + $ 20,000 (P/F, 15%, 12 years)
Present worth of alternative 4 = - $ 100,000 + $ 41,500 5.420619 + $ 20,000 0.1869
Present worth of alternative 4 = $ 128,693.69
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The best alternative is IV because it has the highest present worth compared to other alternatives.
* Question Completion Status: Mutually Exclusive Alternative Four mutually exclusive alternatives are being evaluated, and their...
c. If the total capital investment budget is $150,000 , which alternative should be selected ? d.If the total capital investment budget available is $200,000 , which alternative should be selected ( if the alternatives are independent ) ? Four mutually exclusive alternatives are being evaluated, and their costs and revenues are itemized below. a. If the MARR is 15% per year and the analysis period is 12 years, use the PW method to determine which alternatives are economically acceptable...
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given next. The MARR is 20% per year. At the conclusion of the useful life, the investment will be sold. B Investment cost Annual expenses Annual revenues Market value Useful life $28,000 $15,000 $23,000 $6,000 10 years 10 years 10 years 26.4% $55,000 $40,000 $22,000 $32,000 $10,000 $13,000 $28,000 $8,000 24.7% 22.4% IRR A decision-maker can select one of these alternatives or decide to...
Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered for purchase. Doing nothing is also an option. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 10% per year. Using the PW method, which alternative, if either, should be recommended? Capital Investment Annual Revenues Annual Expenses MV at end of useful life Useful Life IRR Alternative 1 $15,000 $8,000 $2,900 $2,000 4 years 17.2% Alternative 2 $23,000 $12,000 S3,000 $800 12 years 38.4%
ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:- Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given. The interest rate is 20% per year. At the conclusion of the useful life, the investment will be sold A C Investment cost $28,000 $55,000 $13,000 $28,000 $8,000 $40,000 Annual expenses Annual revenues $15,000 $23,000 $6,000 10 years $22,000 $32,000 13 $10,000 Salvage value Useful life 10 years 10 years A decision-maker can select one of these alternatives or...
Consider the following EOY cash flows for two mutually exclusive alternatives (one must be chosen). The MARR is 12% per year. Capital Investment Annual expenses Useful life Market value at end of useful life Lead Acid $8,000 $2,250 12 years $0 Lithium lon $13,000 $2,300 18 years $2,800 Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when /= 12% per year. (a) Determine which altemative should be selected based on the PW method. Assume repeatabllity...
2) Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered, with each one having a useful life of 10 years. The estimated sales and cost data for each alternative are shown. Annual revenues are based on the number of units sold and the selling price. Annual expenses are based on the fixed and variable costs. If the MARR is 20% per year, determine which alternative is preferable based on the PW Method. 12 Investment cost Units to be sold each year...
2) Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered, with each one having a useful life of 10 years. The estimated sales and cost data for each alternative are shown. Annual revenues are based on the number of units sold and the selling price. Annual expenses are based on the fixed and variable costs. If the MARR is 20% per year, determine which alternative is preferable based on the PW Method. 12 Investment cost Units to be sold each year...
engineering economy The AW of Alternative A is? The AW of Alternative B is? Two mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered. The MARR is 15% per year. General inflation is 4.5% / year Based on the data below, perform an appropriate analysis to select the most economical alternative. Assume that the market value grows at the general inflation rate. Alternative A Alternative B 51700D5240,000 Initial investment Annual revenue (actual $) $43,000 $48,000 $3,000 in year 1 increasing by $300 each...
A small construction project having a useful life of 5 years has five mutually exclusive alternatives. With an MARR of 6% and using incremental IRR which alternative should be selected? Note: First solve for the IRR for each alternative. You may use a spreadsheet to iterate to solve, but solve for the IRR for Alternative II 'by hand' by iterating between the interest rate tables in the back of the book. Alternatives III $400 $90 Initial Cost Uniform Annual Benefit...
Question 23 Below are mutually exclusive alternatives, the alternative/s to be selected is/are: Alternative PW, $ -35,000 -15,000 8,000 13,000 Only C 0 Only D 0 Only A 0 0 o Cand D