Question

Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered for purchase. Doing nothing is also an option. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 10% per year. Using the PW method, which alternative, if either, should be recommended? Capital Investment Annual Revenues Annual Expenses MV at end of useful life Useful Life IRR Alternative 1 $15,000 $8,000 $2,900 $2,000 4 years 17.2% Alternative 2 $23,000 $12,000 S3,000 $800 12 years 38.4%

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered for purchase. Doing nothing is also an option....
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are...

    Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given next. The MARR is 20% per year. At the conclusion of the useful life, the investment will be sold. B Investment cost Annual expenses Annual revenues Market value Useful life $28,000 $15,000 $23,000 $6,000 10 years 10 years 10 years 26.4% $55,000 $40,000 $22,000 $32,000 $10,000 $13,000 $28,000 $8,000 24.7% 22.4% IRR A decision-maker can select one of these alternatives or decide to...

  • ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:- Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash...

    ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:- Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given. The interest rate is 20% per year. At the conclusion of the useful life, the investment will be sold A C Investment cost $28,000 $55,000 $13,000 $28,000 $8,000 $40,000 Annual expenses Annual revenues $15,000 $23,000 $6,000 10 years $22,000 $32,000 13 $10,000 Salvage value Useful life 10 years 10 years A decision-maker can select one of these alternatives or...

  • 2) Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered, with each one having a useful life...

    2) Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered, with each one having a useful life of 10 years. The estimated sales and cost data for each alternative are shown. Annual revenues are based on the number of units sold and the selling price. Annual expenses are based on the fixed and variable costs. If the MARR is 20% per year, determine which alternative is preferable based on the PW Method. 12 Investment cost Units to be sold each year...

  • 2) Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered, with each one having a useful life...

    2) Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered, with each one having a useful life of 10 years. The estimated sales and cost data for each alternative are shown. Annual revenues are based on the number of units sold and the selling price. Annual expenses are based on the fixed and variable costs. If the MARR is 20% per year, determine which alternative is preferable based on the PW Method. 12 Investment cost Units to be sold each year...

  • USE ANNUAL WORTH Analysis Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows...

    USE ANNUAL WORTH Analysis Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given in the following table with MARR = 10% per year. Suggest your recommendation by using multiple attribute annual worth AW analysis. Design A Design B Investment cost (RM) 28,000 55,000 One-off expenses 10,000 13,000 In year 4 (RM) Annual revenues (RM) 22,000 28,000 Market value (RM) 6,000 8,000 Useful life 10 years 6 years

  • * Question Completion Status: Mutually Exclusive Alternative Four mutually exclusive alternatives are being evaluated, and their...

    * Question Completion Status: Mutually Exclusive Alternative Four mutually exclusive alternatives are being evaluated, and their costs and revenues are itemized in Table a. If the MARR is 15% per year and the analysis period is 12 years, use the PW method to determine which alternatives are economically acceptable and which one should be selected? Capital Investment Annual Revenues less expenses Market Value (end of useful life) Useful life (years) $150,000 15,200 10,000 $125,000 31,900 $200,000 35,900 15,000 $100,000 41,500...

  • engineering economy QUESTION 2 The following mutually exclusive investment alternatives have been presented to you A...

    engineering economy QUESTION 2 The following mutually exclusive investment alternatives have been presented to you A B C E Capital investment $60,000 $90,000 $40,000 $30,000 $70,000 Annual expenses $30,000 $40,000 $25,000 $15,000 $35,000 Annual revenues $50,000 $52,000 $38,000 $28,000 $45,000 MV at EOY 10 $15,000 $15,000 $10,000 $10,000 $15,000 IRR 31.5 % 7.4 % 30.8 % 42.5 % 9.2 % The life span of all alternatives is 10 years.. Using a MARR of 15 % per year, what is the...

  • Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each wernative we...

    Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each wernative we given below. The study period is 30 years and the firm's MARR is 6% per year. Assume repeatability and reinvestment of positive cash balances at 6 per year a. What is the simple payback period for Alternative 1? b. What is the annual worth of Alternative 2? c. What is the IRR of the incremental cash flows of Alternative 2 compared to Aheative 1?...

  • The following mutually exclusive investment alternatives have been presented to you. The life of all alternatives...

    The following mutually exclusive investment alternatives have been presented to you. The life of all alternatives is 10 years. A В C Capital investment Annual expenses $60,000 $90,000 $40,000 $30,000 $70,000 35,000 45,000 15,000 30,000 40,000 25,000 16,000 Annual revenues 50,000 52.000 38,000 28,000 Market value at EOY 10 15,000 10,000 10,000 39.0% 10,000 IRR ??? 7.4% 30.8% 9.2% After the base alternative has been identified, the first comparison to be made in an incremental analysis should be which of...

  • Two mutually exclusive water purification systems are being considered for implementation overseas. Refer to the data...

    Two mutually exclusive water purification systems are being considered for implementation overseas. Refer to the data below: System 1 System 2 Capital investment Annual revenues Annual expenses MV at end of useful life Useful life $100,000 $50,000 $15,000 $20,000 13 years $150,000 $75,000 $20,000 0 26 years If MARR = 30 % per year, determine the present worth (PW) of the most profitable water purification system to use. Use the repeatability assumption. (Enter your answer as a number without the...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT