Question

All one question. Part 1 is background info on the company and is asking to "estimate the price GCL may get for Fleet as of January 1, 2008"?GCL Industries is an industrial conglomerate undergoing restructuring. As part of its restructuring program GCL is considering the sale of its low-growth Fleet Meat Packing unit. Fleet is in the high volume-low margin meatpacking business. Fleets volume sales are not expected to increase in the future and the long-term growth of dollar sales is projected at 3% per year. Operating projections and other pertinent data are presented below. Estimate the price GCL may get for Fleet as of January 1, 2008Fleet Meat Packing Co., 2008-2012 Projection Actual 2007 Forecast 2010 2008 2009 2011 2012 Sales EBITDA margin Depreciation Increase in deferred taxes CAPEX +Net WC increase 2223.2 2.55% 29.0 0.5 38.7 2245.6 2284.2 2308.0 2550.0 2616.7 2.57% 2.65% 2.71% 2.71% 2.71% 31.5 2.5 32.5 34.2 2.2 42.2 32.9 2.9 33.4 32.0 2.5 32.5 32.6 41.8 Corporate tax rate: 38% GCL estimates that the buyer can finance the acquisition with 50% debt that can be raised at 7%. The beta of companies in Fleets industry with similar capital structures is 1.32. The yield on 10-year Treasury notes is 4.5%, the equity risk premium is about 4.4% and the micro-cap size premium is about 3.9% . . Valuation multiple: An examination of comparable companies yielded an average EBITDA multiple equal to 6 times current (2007) EBITDA.

This is part 2 of the same problem. It is asking "is the result different from that obtained in the first part of this problem"?A prospective buyer of Fleet Meat Packing Co. would like to finance the acquisition entirely with equity capital and not use debt financing in the future. The buyer would like to determine the maximum price to pay for Fleet. The buyer has estimated that the beta coefficient in the absence of debt would be 0.66 and that the cost of equity should allow for a micro-cap size premium equal to 3.9%. Furthermore, the riskless rate is 4.5%, the equity premium is 4.4%, and the corporate tax rate is 38%. Value fleet under this financial structure. Is the result different from that obtained in problem 2.4? Why?

I do not know how to solve this. Any guidance will be greatly appreciated. Thank you

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1
Valuation method 1 FCFF
Long term growth rate 3%
Cost of debt Pre-tax 7%
Tax rate 38%
Cost of debt Post-tax 4.34%
Cost of equity 14.21%
=4.5%+1.32*(4.4%)+3.9%
Debt % 50%
Equity % 50%
WACC 9.27%
Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 onwards
Period 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sales 2223.2 2245.6 2284.2 2308.2 2550 2616.7
EBITDA margin 2.55% 2.57% 2.65% 2.71% 2.71% 2.71%
EBITDA margin        56.69        57.71        60.53        62.55        69.11        70.91
Depreciation 29 32.6 34.2 32.9 32 31.5
Increase in deferred tax 0.5 1.6 2.2 2.9 2.5 2.5
CAPEX+ Net WC increase 38.7 41.8 42.2 33.4 32.5 32.5
FCFF          7.47          6.37          8.33        17.88        22.51        23.44     384.74
PV          7.47          5.83          6.97        13.71        15.78        15.04     225.98
Total PV of FCFF (2008 onwards)     283.31
Valuation method 2 EBITDA multiple
Industry average multiple 6 times
Company EBIDTA (2007)        56.69
Company valuation=     340.15
=EBITDA * average EBITDA multiple
Average of 2 valuation methods     311.73
Projected value of company=     311.73

This value is influenced by the cost structure of purchasing company since the WACC is execpted to be influences by 50-50 debt equity structure

New WACC for prospective buyer
Cost of equity 11.30%
=4.5%+0.66*(4.4%)+3.9%
Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 onwards
Period 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sales 2223.2 2245.6 2284.2 2308.2 2550 2616.7
EBITDA margin 2.55% 2.57% 2.65% 2.71% 2.71% 2.71%
EBITDA margin        56.69        57.71        60.53        62.55        69.11        70.91
Depreciation 29 32.6 34.2 32.9 32 31.5
Increase in deferred tax 0.5 1.6 2.2 2.9 2.5 2.5
CAPEX+ Net WC increase 38.7 41.8 42.2 33.4 32.5 32.5
FCFF          7.47          6.37          8.33        17.88        22.51        23.44     290.69
PV          7.47          5.72          6.72        12.97        14.66        13.72     152.89
Total PV of FCFF (2008 onwards)     206.68

The cost of equity is higher. Hence, without leverage, the WACC is higher when only funded through equity structure. As a result, the Firm value for the buyer with new capital structure will be lower, if they wish to restructure the acquired company as per their current capital structure

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
All one question. Part 1 is background info on the company and is asking to "estimate...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Given the value line: a.) what is the top line growth for 2015? b.)Bottom-Line? c.) Annual...

    Given the value line: a.) what is the top line growth for 2015? b.)Bottom-Line? c.) Annual dividen per share? d.) Current ratio in 2014? e.) % bonds of Captial structure f.) p/e ratio g.) beta h.) EBITDA % I.) Long-Debt % change 2015 We were unable to transcribe this image41.65 TO 20.1 (Media 92) ATM 1.12 ** 3.4% YAKE 1965 07 2:22. 87 3. 35.8 COCA-COLA NYSE:KO TIMELINESS 4 Lowered 70115 h: 289 29 SAFETY . 1 New 727190 LEGENDS...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT