Question

Writing assignment: What can we learn from non-written and biased sources? How does this affect the way we understand history?

1. Topic Sentence/Thesis Statement: Your first sentence should directly answer the question in the assignment. It should be clear and direct, and provide an argument. If you write a sentence that is too general, then you will not be able to organize your answer and to provide details.

2. First Criterion: In this section, you will provide and analyze evidence that supports the first part of your Thesis Statement. Remember to use evidence from your textbook and primary sources. After presenting your information, make sure you cite your information.

3. Second Criterion: Like above, provide and analyze your evidence. Make sure that you transition between the different sections of your argument.

4. Third Criterion

5. Conclusion: Here, you want to summarize your ideas without repetition. The best way to do so is to rephrase your thesis statement.

Answer 1

Non written and biased sources including media interviews are often ambiguous and biased because of political grapevines and extrapolated reports and political cendettas set out.

Since media is no more judgemental but more biased towards certain political agendas and parties which seek favor from fake news reports

The most famous case reports in india by Arnab Goswami who is the renowned chief news editor clearly conducts interviews of political agendas in which questions are tweaked and already shared towards the governing parties and means to indirectly defame and ambiguate opposition parties.

This sort of news tends to create biased views and perceptions and have also helped political parties to convince voters to vote for them. The empirical studies is visible where party wins general elections massively just by creating fabricated and milked news and biased reports through media connections.

All in all it is important for citizens to just not follow one set of news reports but also analyze and weigh different opinions to form unambiguously identified concrete evidence of any subject. Thus true facts of history and real incidences are fabricated.