Question

in this exercise is to provide each argument with such a counterview.

1. Our experiments suggest that there are dangerous levels of chemical X in the Ohio groundwater.

2. Material forces drive history.

3. Proponents of Freudian psychology question standard

   notions of “rationality.”

4. Male students often dominate class discussions.

5. The film is about the problems of romantic relationships.

6. I’m afraid that templates like the ones in this book will stifle my creativity.

Answer 1

5. Chemical x isn't perilous it's really a substance that makes immaculate young ladies.
5. Materials don't drive anything
5. They state defenders of Freudian brain research question standard ideas of objectivity. be that as it may, I state there is no sanity in what this is in any event, saying.
5. They state male understudies frequently overwhelm class discourses, I state that there is actually no male control in anything. Everybody is equivalent.
5. They state the film is about the issues of sentimental connections yet I say its regarding connections that endure difficult occasions.
5. They state layouts like the ones in this book will smother my innovativeness yet I state it will really assist me with winding up progressively imaginative.