10 Points
The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, begun in 1932, led directly to the statement of explicit ethical principles in the Nuremberg Code of 1948 and the Declaration of Helsinki in 1964.
10 Points
The Nuremberg Code emphasized each of the following except:
Monetary compensation is a right of any research subject
Voluntary consent must be obtained from every research subject
Subjects have the right to withdraw at any time.
Studies must be conducted in a manner that avoids unnecessary injury
Experiments must benefit society
Question 3
10 Points
The declaration of Helsinki expanded on the Nuremberg Code by explicitly stating the duty of a physician/researcher to safeguard patients/research subjects, defining the elements of informed consent, and emphasizing proper research design that is ethical and results in an acceptable risk/benefit ratio
10 Points
The Belmont Report of 1078 first stated our current primary principles of medical and research ethics, which are:
Autonomy, beneficence, appropriate compensation
Autonomy, beneficence, justice
Autonomy, beneficence, informed consent
Appropriate compensation, autonomy, justice
10 Points
The researchers in charge of the Tuskegee Study had adequately covered 2 of the 3 ethics principles noted in the Belmont Report, but most of the ethical problems involved issues of autonony
10 Points
In addition to ensuring the subjects understands the normal elements of informed consent, the researcher has an ethical obligation to ensure that subjects have no misconceptions of the research (for instance, a belief that participation will cure them).
10 Points
The IRB is concerned with the protection of human subjects, defined as any individual, living or dead, about whom a researcher obtains data through medical intervention, medical records, or obtaining tissue or blood samples.
10 Points
The IRB requires that each of the human subjects in your study must be completely informed about the study and its procedures and risks, and the consent you obtain must be uncoerced.
10 Points
The Informed Consent Document should be written in lay terms at the level of a high school graduate
10 Points
If you provide payments to your subjects, they should be limited to compensation for time and effort and out-of-pocket expenses, so they are not so high they could be considered coercive
10 Points
An important element of the informed consent document is an explicit statement that participation in research is completely voluntary and that the subject will not be penalized if he or she decides not to participate or withdraws during the study.
10 Points
Only the principal investigator needs to have a copy of the informed consent document.
10 Points
Which of the following would likely be of little or no concern to an IRB?
The information provided in your informed consent document
The risk/benefit ratio for the subjects involved in the project
The source of funding you have obtained for the project
The information presented in any subject recruitment flyers of advertisements.
The means you will use to protect the confidentiality of subjects' data
10 Points
Which of the following is not a normal element of the IRB application that must be reviewed by the IRB?
The informed consent document
The proposed research protocol
The amount of compensation to the subjects, if any
The amount of compensation for the research staff
10 Points
If you will be doing nothing more to your subjects than would be done in routine physical or psychological evaluations and presents no greater than normal risks of daily living, you should categorize your study as:
Minor increase over minimal risk
Moderate risk
No more than minimal risk
High risk
Answer:
1. True
Reason: The statement is true regarding the Tuskegee syphilis study
2. Monetary compensation is a right of any research subject
Reason: Nuremberg code is not emphasized on the monetary compensation.
3. True
4. Autonomy, beneficence, justice
Reason: Belmont report summarizes the ethical principles and guidelines. These are the 3 core principles were identified.
Question 1 10 Points The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, begun in 1932, led directly to the statement...
Discuss how medical paternalism was demonstrated in the Tuskegee Syphilis study. Elaborate on the aspects of this study that helped form the ethical research principles we are guided by today. Specifically, discuss how the ethical principle of distributive justice was violated. Explain how the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence were violated. Lastly, discuss how informed consent was handled in this research study. As a researcher, do you believe great findings such as the ones in this study are ever worth...
The Informed Consent Document should be written in lay terms at the level of a high school graduate True False Question 10 10 Points If you provide payments to your subjects, they should be limited to compensation for time and effort and out-of-pocket expenses, so they are not so high they could be considered coercive True False Question 11 10 Points An important element of the informed consent document is an explicit statement that participation in research is completely voluntary...
The Informed Consent Document should be written in lay terms at the level of a high school graduate True False Question 10 10 Points If you provide payments to your subjects, they should be limited to compensation for time and effort and out-of-pocket expenses, so they are not so high they could be considered coercive True False Question 11 10 Points An important element of the informed consent document is an explicit statement that participation in research is completely voluntary...
15 The Tuskegee Syphilis Study targeted both African American and white males. ut of Select one: True False How would a Kantian deontologist justify the use of informed consent? Select one: a. Informed consent improves the chance that a patient would comply with treatment prescriptions. b. Informed consent is helpful in avoiding lawsuits. c. Informed consent respects the autonomy of a patient d. b and c e. None of the above. What were some of the results of the Tuskegee...
Summarize each parts(provide a thoughtful, complete (yet concise) overview, Do not include any direct quotes from your text or any other source) 1. One of the earliest ethics codes was the Nuremberg Code—a set of 10 principles written in 1947 in conjunction with the trials of Nazi physicians accused of shockingly cruel research on concentration camp prisoners during World War II. It provided a standard against which to compare the behavior of the men on trial—many of whom were eventually...
Tuskegee Study Syphilis is a chronic, contagious bacterial disease that is most often sexually transmitted but is sometimes congenital. Since about 1946, the disease has been successfully treated with antibiotics. Prior to 1946, individuals with the disease had an inevitable progress through its Ш sequelae, from the primary lesion and chancre to rash, fever, and swollen lymph nodes to the final stage of nervous system and circulatory problems, and finally death. The progress of the disease is often 30-40 years....
just the answers, no explanation The three main components of informed consent must include: 1. Full disclosure on the nature of the study. 2. Risk, benefits and alternatives and and 3 3. The names of all other participants and their results The chance to ask questions and receive answers to all their questions A written report on al data obtained from this experiment on previous participants QUESTION 13 The 3 main Ethical Principles of of the Belmont Report include: 1....
The men of the Tuskegee study were egregiously deceived. They were uninformed by having information withheld, and intentionally misinformed--in other words, lied to. Today there are rules regarding informed consent, whereby subjects of research and experimentation are given full disclosure in order to willingly and voluntarily agree to participate in studies and experiments. But consider this: In some cases, even though prospective subjects are given full and complete information, they do not understand the information they are being given. For...
Summarize below article 300 words no plagiarism. Thanks INTRODUCTION Informed consent is a decision to participate in research, taken by a competent individual who has received the necessary information; who has adequately understood the information; and who, after considering the information, has arrived at a decision without having been subjected to coercion, undue influence or inducement, or intimidation. Informed consent is a prerequisite for enrolling human subjects in biomedical research. The concept of “Informed consent” was enshrined in the Nuremberg...
QUESTION 1 Researchers are interested in the speed of responses people make to different target finding tasks. They state that reaction time is the time in the unit of milliseconds between the presentation of a stimulus, and the keyboard press made by the individual. This is an operational definition of reaction time. True False QUESTION 2 Some researchers are interested in the cognitive limits to the various tasks air traffic controllers perform. They figure the best way to understand these...