Please hit LIKE button if this helped. For any further explanation, please put your query in comment, will get back to you. | |||||
Part 1 | Transaction | Accounts | Debit | Credit | |
Purchase of | Materials Inventory | 640,000 | |||
raw materials | Accounts Payable | 640,000 | |||
Materials | Work-in-Process Inventory | 640,000 | |||
issued to | Materials Inventory | 640,000 | |||
production | |||||
Direct labor | Work-in-Process Inventory | 96,000 | |||
cost incurred | Wages Payable | 96,000 | |||
Overhead | Overhead Control | 666,600 | |||
cost incurred | Accounts Payable | 666,600 | |||
Application | Work-in-Process Inventory ($719,800-$96,000) | 623,800 | |||
of overhead | Overhead Control | 623,800 | |||
Completion | Finished Goods Inventory | 1,359,800 | |||
of goods | Work-in-Process Inventory | 1,359,800 | |||
Goods are | Cost of Goods Sold | 1,359,800 | |||
sold | Finished Goods Inventory | 1,359,800 | |||
Variance is | Cost of Goods Sold | 42,800 | |||
recognized | Overhead Control | 42,800 | |||
Transaction | Backflush Journal Entries: Variation 1 | ||||
Purchase of | Raw Materials and In Process Inventory | 640,000 | |||
Accounts Payable | 640,000 | ||||
Materials | |||||
issued to | No entry | ||||
production | |||||
Direct labor | Combined with OH: See next entry. | ||||
cost incurred | |||||
Overhead | Conversion Cost Control | 736,000 | |||
cost incurred | Wages Payable | 96,000 | |||
Accounts Payable | 640,000 | ||||
Application | No entry | ||||
of overhead | |||||
Completion | Finished Goods Inventory | 1,359,800 | |||
of goods | RIP Inventory | 640,000 | |||
Conversion Cost Control | 719,800 | ||||
Transaction | Backflush Journal Entries: Variation 1 | ||||
Goods are | Cost of Goods Sold | 1,359,800 | |||
sold | Finished Goods Inventory | 1,359,800 | |||
Variance is | Cost of Goods Sold | 42,800 | |||
recognized | Conversion Cost Control | 42,800 | |||
2 | Entries 6 and 7 in Requirement 1 are replaced with the following entry: | ||||
Cost of Goods Sold | 1,359,800 | ||||
Raw Materials and In Process Inventory | 640,000 | ||||
Conversion Cost Control | 719,800 | ||||
3a | No entry for Transaction 1; Transaction 6 is replaced with the following entry: | ||||
Finished Goods Inventory | 1,359,800 | ||||
Accounts Payable | 640,000 | ||||
Conversion Cost Control | 719,800 | ||||
3b | No entry for Transaction 1; Entries 6 and 7 are replaced with the following: | ||||
Cost of Goods Sold | 1,359,800 | ||||
Accounts Payable | 640,000 | ||||
Conversion Cost Control | 719,800 |
Backflush Costing Hepworth Company has implemented a JIT system and is considering the use of backflush...
Backflush Costing Hepworth Company has implemented a JIT system and is considering the use of backflush costing. Hepworth had the following transactions for the current fiscal year: Purchased raw materials on account for $560,000. Placed all materials received into production. Incurred actual direct labor costs of $84,000. Incurred actual overhead costs of $583,400. Applied conversion costs of $630,200. Completed all work for the month. Sold all completed work. Computed the difference between actual and applied costs. Required: 1. Prepare the...
Backflush versus Traditional Costing: Variations 3 and 4 Potter Company has installed a JIT purchasing and manufacturing system and is using backflush accounting for its cost flows. It currently uses a two-trigger approach with the purchase of materials as the first trigger point and the completion of goods as the second trigger point. During the month of June, Potter had the following transactions: Raw materials purchased $243,000 Direct labor cost 41,500 Overhead cost 207,750 Conversion cost applied 269,750* *$41,500 labor...
Backflush versus Traditional Costing: Variations 3 and 4 Potter Company has installed a JIT purchasing and manufacturing system and is using backflush accounting for its cost flows. It currently uses a two-trigger approach with the purchase of materials as the first trigger point and the completion of goods as the second trigger point. During the month of June, Potter had the following transactions: Raw materials purchased $244,000 Direct labor cost 41,000 Overhead cost 204,750 Conversion cost applied 266,500 *$41,000 labor...
Backflush Costing: Variation 2 Potter Company has installed a JIT purchasing and manufacturing system and is using backflush accounting for its cost flows. It currently uses a two-trigger approach with the purchase of materials as the first trigger point and the completion of goods as the second trigger point. During the month of June, Potter had the following transactions: Raw materials purchased $243,000 Direct labor cost 40,500 Overhead cost 202,500 Conversion cost applied 263,250* *$40,500 labor plus $222,750 overhead. There...
Backflush Costing Kenkel, Ltd, uses backfush costing to account for its monufacturing costs. The trigger points are the purchase Prepare journal entries to account for the following: For a compound transaction, if an amount box does not require an entry, leave ir blank or enter "or. ir no entry required (Hint: use a single account for raw materials and work in process) of materials, the completion of goods, and the sale of goods. an entry, leave it blank or enter...
Backflush costing and JIT production. The Grand Meter Corporation manufactures electrical meters. For August, there were no beginning inventories of the direct materials and no beginning or ending work in process. Grand Meter uses a JIT production system and backflush costing with three trigger points for making entries in the accounting system: - Purchase of direct materials and incurring of conversion costs - Completion of good finished units of production - Sale of finished goods Grand Meter's August standard cost...
A firm uses backflush costing to assign product costs to inventory and values inventory using direct costing. All actual amounts below are equal to budgeted amounts. The firm has NO fixed overhead. Total DM: $15,000 Total DL: $10,000 Overhead: $1,000 The firm has 30 units in finished goods inventory and 50 units in process. The firm does a count of raw materials inventory and finds $350 of raw materials inventory on hand at the end of the period. Which of...
Yehuda Corporation makes baby monitors and uses all production system and a backflush costing system. For the month of February 2018, there were no beginning finished goods, no beginning inventories of raw materials, and no beginning or ending work in process. The February standard costs per monitor were, direct materials $20.00 and conversion costs $16.00. The following data pertain to February 2018 manufacturing Raw materials and components purchased $1,020,000 Conversion costs incurred $ 780,000 Number of monitors made $ 50,000...
Overhead Variances and Their Disposal Warner Company has the following data for the past year: Actual overhead $489,500 Applied overhead: Work-in-process inventory $104,000 Finished goods inventory 208,000 Cost of goods sold 208,000 Total $520,000 Warner uses the overhead control account to accumulate both actual and applied overhead. Required: 1. Calculate the overhead variance for the year. $ Provide the appropriate adjusting journal entry to close the overhead variance to Cost of Goods Sold. 2. Assume the variance calculated is material....
Warner Company has the following data for the past year: Actual overhead $470,000 Applied overhead: Work-in-process inventory $100,000 Finished goods inventory 200,000 Cost of goods sold 200,000 Total $500,000 Warner uses the overhead control account to accumulate both actual and applied overhead. Required: 1. Calculate the overhead variance for the year. Provide the appropriate adjusting journal entry to close the overhead variance to Cost of Goods Sold. 2. Assume the variance calculated is material. After prorating, close the variances to...