a]
ROIC = net income / invested capital
Firm HL
net income of HL = (EBIT - interest) * (1 - tax rate)
interest = debt-to-capital ratio * invested capital * interest rate
interest = 60% * $15,000,000 * 12% = $1,080,000
net income = ($4,500,000 - $1,080,000) * (1 - 40%) = $2,052,000
ROIC = $2,052,000 / $15,000,000 = 13.68%
Firm UL
net income of UL = (EBIT - interest) * (1 - tax rate)
interest = debt-to-capital ratio * invested capital * interest rate
interest = 25% * $15,000,000 * 8% = $300,000
net income = ($4,500,000 - $300,000) * (1 - 40%) = $2,520,000
ROIC = $2,520,000 / $15,000,000 = 16.80%
b]
ROE = net income / equity
Firm HL
equity = invested capital * (1 - debt-to-capital ratio)
equity = $15,000,000 * (1 - 60%) = $6,000,000
ROE = $2,052,000 / $6,000,000 = 34.20%
Firm UL
equity = invested capital * (1 - debt-to-capital ratio)
equity = $15,000,000 * (1 - 25%) = $11,250,000
ROE = $2,520,000 / $11,250,000 = 22.40%
c]
net income of UL = (EBIT - interest) * (1 - tax rate)
interest = debt-to-capital ratio * invested capital * interest rate
interest = 60% * $15,000,000 * 15% = $1,350,000
net income = ($4,500,000 - $1,350,000) * (1 - 40%) = $1,890,000
equity = invested capital * (1 - debt-to-capital ratio)
equity = $15,000,000 * (1 - 60%) = $6,000,000
ROE = $1,890,000 / $6,000,000 = 31.50%
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and...
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and the interest rates they pay on debt. Each has $25 million in invested capital, has $6.25 million of EBIT, and is in the 40% federal-plus-state tax bracket. Firm HL, however, has a debt-to-capital ratio of 60% and pays 11% interest on its debt, whereas LL has a 40% debt-to-capital ratio and pays only 10% interest on its debt. Neither firm uses preferred stock in...
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and the interest rates they pay on debt. Each has $28 million in invested capital, has $4.2 million of EBIT, and is in the 40% federal-plus-state tax bracket. Firm HL, however, has a debt-to-capital ratio of 60% and pays 11% interest on its debt, whereas LL has a 20% debt-to-capital ratio and pays only 9% interest on its debt. Neither firm uses preferred stock in...
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and the interest rates they pay on debt. Each has $19 million in invested capital, has $5.7 million of EBIT, and is in the 40% federal-plus-state tax bracket. Firm HL, however, has a debt-to-capital ratio of 60% and pays 11% interest on its debt, whereas LL has a 30% debt-to-capital ratio and pays only 10% interest on its debt. Neither firm uses preferred stock in...
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and the interest rates they pay on debt. Each has $18 million in invested capital, has $3.6 million of EBIT, and is in the 40% federal-plus-state tax bracket. Firm HL, however, has a debt-to-capital ratio of 55% and pays 13% interest on its debt, whereas LL has a 20% debt-to-capital ratio and pays only 8% interest on its debt. Neither firm uses preferred stock in...
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and the interest rates they pay on debt. Each has $11 million in invested capital, has $2.2 million of EBIT, and is in the 40% federal-plus-state tax bracket. Firm HL, however, has a debt-to-capital ratio of 50% and pays 11% interest on its debt, whereas LL has a 35% debt-to-capital ratio and pays only 10% interest on its debt. Neither firm uses preferred stock in...
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and the interest rates they pay on debt. Each has $12 million in invested capital, has $2.4 million of EBIT, and is in the 40% federal-plus-state tax bracket. Firm HL, however, has a debt-to-capital ratio of 55% and pays 13% interest on its debt, whereas LL has a 20% debt-to-capital ratio and pays only 10% interest on its debt. Neither firm uses preferred stock in...
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and the interest rates they pay on debt. Each has $20 million in invested capital, has $4 million of EBIT, and is in the 40% federal-plus-state tax bracket. Firm HL, however, has a debt-to-capital ratio of 55% and pays 11% interest on its debt, whereas LL has a 25% debt-to-capital ratio and pays only 9% interest on its debt. Neither firm uses preferred stock in...
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and the interest rates they pay on debt. Each has $26 million in invested capital, has $3.9 million of EBIT, and is in the 40% federal-plus-state tax bracket. Firm HL, however, has a debt-to-capital ratio of 55% and pays 13% interest on its debt, whereas LL has a 25% debt-to-capital ratio and pays only 10% interest on its debt. Neither firm uses preferred stock in...
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and the interest rates they pay on debt. Each has $20 million in invested capital, has $3 million of EBIT, and is in the 40% federal-plus-state tax bracket. Firm HL, however, has a debt-to-capital ratio of 55% and pays 13% interest on its debt, whereas LL has a 20% debt-to-capital ratio and pays only 8% interest on its debt. Neither firm uses preferred stock in...
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and the interest rates they pay on debt. Each has $11 million in invested capital, has $2.2 million of EBIT, and is in the 40% federal-plus- state tax bracket. Firm HL, however, has a debt-to-capital ratio of 55% and pays 11% interest on its debt, whereas LL has a 40% debt-to-capital ratio and pays only 8% interest on its debt. Neither firm uses preferred stock...