Part a.
For ROIC we use the following formula:
ROIC for LL: |
=3000000*(1-40%)/20000000
=9.00%
Similarly for HL also the ROIC will be same:
=3000000*(1-40%)/20000000
=9.00%
Part b.
For this we first need to find net income for both the cases by deducting Interest & Tax expenses from EBIT as shown below:
HL | LL | |||||
Invested capital | 20000000 | 20000000 | ||||
EBIT | 3000000 | 3000000 | ||||
Tax bracket | 40% | 40% | ||||
Debt ratio | 55% | 20% | ||||
Interest expenses | 13% | 8% | ||||
Interest payment | 14,30,000 | 3,20,000 | =Interest rate* (Debt ratio * Invested capital) | |||
Tax payment | 628000 | 1072000 | =Tax rate * (EBIT- Interest expense) | |||
Net Profit after Tax | 2372000 | 1928000 | =EBIT- Tax payment | |||
ROE | 26.36% | 12.05% | = Net Income/(Capital * (1- Debt ratio)) |
Part c.
With the proposed changes, the calculations for LL's ROE would get changed as following:
LL | ||||||
Interest payment | 18,00,000 | =Interest rate* (Debt ratio * Invested capital) | ||||
EBIT | 3000000 | |||||
Tax payment | 480000 | =Tax rate * (EBIT- Interest expense) | ||||
Net Profit after Tax | 2520000 | =EBIT- Tax payment | ||||
New ROE | 31.50% | = Net Income/(Capital * (1- Debt ratio)) |
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and...
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and the interest rates they pay on debt. Each has $18 million in invested capital, has $3.6 million of EBIT, and is in the 40% federal-plus-state tax bracket. Firm HL, however, has a debt-to-capital ratio of 55% and pays 13% interest on its debt, whereas LL has a 20% debt-to-capital ratio and pays only 8% interest on its debt. Neither firm uses preferred stock in...
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and the interest rates they pay on debt. Each has $12 million in invested capital, has $2.4 million of EBIT, and is in the 40% federal-plus-state tax bracket. Firm HL, however, has a debt-to-capital ratio of 55% and pays 13% interest on its debt, whereas LL has a 20% debt-to-capital ratio and pays only 10% interest on its debt. Neither firm uses preferred stock in...
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and the interest rates they pay on debt. Each has $28 million in invested capital, has $4.2 million of EBIT, and is in the 40% federal-plus-state tax bracket. Firm HL, however, has a debt-to-capital ratio of 60% and pays 11% interest on its debt, whereas LL has a 20% debt-to-capital ratio and pays only 9% interest on its debt. Neither firm uses preferred stock in...
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and the interest rates they pay on debt. Each has $20 million in invested capital, has $4 million of EBIT, and is in the 40% federal-plus-state tax bracket. Firm HL, however, has a debt-to-capital ratio of 55% and pays 11% interest on its debt, whereas LL has a 25% debt-to-capital ratio and pays only 9% interest on its debt. Neither firm uses preferred stock in...
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and the interest rates they pay on debt. Each has $11 million in invested capital, has $2.2 million of EBIT, and is in the 40% federal-plus-state tax bracket. Firm HL, however, has a debt-to-capital ratio of 50% and pays 11% interest on its debt, whereas LL has a 35% debt-to-capital ratio and pays only 10% interest on its debt. Neither firm uses preferred stock in...
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and the interest rates they pay on debt. Each has $25 million in invested capital, has $6.25 million of EBIT, and is in the 40% federal-plus-state tax bracket. Firm HL, however, has a debt-to-capital ratio of 60% and pays 11% interest on its debt, whereas LL has a 40% debt-to-capital ratio and pays only 10% interest on its debt. Neither firm uses preferred stock in...
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and the interest rates they pay on debt. Each has $26 million in invested capital, has $3.9 million of EBIT, and is in the 40% federal-plus-state tax bracket. Firm HL, however, has a debt-to-capital ratio of 55% and pays 13% interest on its debt, whereas LL has a 25% debt-to-capital ratio and pays only 10% interest on its debt. Neither firm uses preferred stock in...
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and the interest rates they pay on debt. Each has $15 million in invested capital, has $4.5 million of EBIT, and is in the 40% federal-plus-state tax bracket. Firm HL, however, has a debt-to-capital ratio of 60% and pays 12% interest on its debt, whereas LL has a 25% debt-to-capital ratio and pays only 8% interest on its debt. Neither firm uses preferred stock in...
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and the interest rates they pay on debt. Each has $11 million in invested capital, has $2.2 million of EBIT, and is in the 40% federal-plus- state tax bracket. Firm HL, however, has a debt-to-capital ratio of 55% and pays 11% interest on its debt, whereas LL has a 40% debt-to-capital ratio and pays only 8% interest on its debt. Neither firm uses preferred stock...
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE EFFECTS Firms HL and LL are identical except for their financial leverage ratios and the interest rates they pay on debt. Each has $19 million in invested capital, has $5.7 million of EBIT, and is in the 40% federal-plus-state tax bracket. Firm HL, however, has a debt-to-capital ratio of 60% and pays 11% interest on its debt, whereas LL has a 30% debt-to-capital ratio and pays only 10% interest on its debt. Neither firm uses preferred stock in...