(i)
(ii)
If an operator is Hermitian, then the eigenvalues are real. Requirement
(iii)
Values measured are called expectation values. For definite eigenstates, we know that
what we actually measure is
(iv)
(v)
I already used this condition, but I'll write it again
RHS is the Kronecker delta, which is 1 iff, m=n and 0 otherwise.
(vi) We require
Proceed as in part (iv)
where I used
.
(a) There are a set of eigenstates ๒n) for the Hermitian operator A with non-degenerate eigenvalues...
(a) There are a set of eigenstates ๒n) for the Hermitian operator A with non-degenerate eigenvalues an and a state |ψ Σ¡c; Write down the equation relating the states |>n), the operator A and the eigenvalues a 1. ,n ii. Using Dirac notation explain the requirement for an operator to be Hermitian iii. Explain the relation between the eigenvalues of an operator and the measured iv. For to be properly normalised show the condition required for the values V. Express...
There is a set of eigenstates |φ n) for the Hermitian operator A with non-degenerate eigenvalues an and a general state IV) ŽnCn pn〉 i. Write down the equation relating the states Iøn), the operator A and the eigenvalues an in Dirac notation 11. Use Dirac notation to explain the requirement for an operator to be Hermit ian What does it imply about the eigenvalues? 111. Explain the relation between the eigenvalues of an operator and the measured quant ities...
ONLY (e) (f) NEEDED THANK YOU :) Question 3 Consider the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator, and denote its properly normalised energy eigenstates by { | n〉, n = 0, 1, 2, 3, . . .). Define the state where α is a complex number, and C is a normalisation constant. (a) Use a Campbell-Baker-Hausdorff relation (or otherwise) to show that In other words, | α > is an eigenstate of the (non-Hermitian) lowering operator with (complex) eigenvalue α. (b) During lectures...