Question

Every firm has its approach for understanding a client’s internal control structure. Some firms use a...

Every firm has its approach for understanding a client’s internal control structure. Some firms use a standardized internal control questionnaire to evaluate controls that are in place whereas other firms do not rely on internal controls at all and plan their audits as if there are no controls in place or consider them as not effective.

Assume you are training a new team of auditors for your CPA firm. Prepare a PowerPoint presentation to present the pros and cons of each approach. Then, select the approach that your firm uses (that is, the approach you think is best) and explain why. Include the following components in your presentation:

What effect, if any, does the size of the organization have on the decision?

What are the auditing standard requirements for obtaining an understanding of internal controls?

What are the differences, if any, in understanding internal controls for a public company versus a non-public company?

Your presentation should meet the following criteria:

Be 6-8 slides in length, not including the title and references slides.

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Slide 1

Title: Strategies to evaluate Internal Control

Slide

Using Standardised Internal Control questionnaire

Pros

-Most suitable in case listed entities audit as the volume of data to be evaluated is huge

-Serves as documentary evidence for internal and external reviews by peer review board, US SEC etc

Cons

-Complex task to develop a standardised internal control questionnaire that serves various clients

-Need to consistently update the questionnaire based on regulatory changes

Slide 3:

Not Rely on Controls

Pros

- Results in increase in substantive audit procedures which gives better comfort to the auditor

-Reduces overall audit risk as not relying on controls would result in   lesser control risk

Cons

-Increase in time taken to complete the audit results in adverse audit efficiency

-Significant control deficiencies affecting the auditors opinion maybe ignored resulting in inappropriate audit opinion

Slide 4:

Approach – As per industry best practice

-Standardised Internal Control Questionnaire is the most suitable approach in evaluating the internal control of a company as it has the flexibility to adapt to both big and small clients

-It is an excellent means of documentation for reviews by regulatory authorities

-It also demonstrate the work done by the auditor for understanding the entities internal control as required by the auditing standards

Slide 5:

Effect of size of the Company and public/non public Company

Size of the organisation would have a significant effect on the design of internal control questionnaire

Eg: A client that is listed would need a lot of points to be included in the questionnaire based on the regulatory requirements which may not be necessary for private or a non listed client

Securities and Exchange Commission has a lot of disclosure requirements for all the companies listed in any stock exchange in the USA.

Slide 6 :

Requirement of Auditing Standard

Auditing Standard No. 12 – Requires the following for understanding the internal control over financial reporting:

The auditor should obtain a sufficient understanding of each component of internal control over financial reporting

(a) identify the types of potential misstatements

(b) assess the factors that affect the risks of material misstatement, and

(c) design further audit procedures

Slide 7:

Requirement of Auditing Standard

•Obtaining an understanding of internal control includes evaluating the design of controls that are relevant to the audit and determining whether the controls have been implemented

•Internal control over financial reporting can be described as consisting of the following components:

- The control environment,

- The company's risk assessment process,

- Information and communication,

- Control activities, and

- Monitoring of controls.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Every firm has its approach for understanding a client’s internal control structure. Some firms use a...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Every audit firm has its approach for understanding a client’s internal control structure. Some firms use...

    Every audit firm has its approach for understanding a client’s internal control structure. Some firms use a standardized internal control questionnaire to evaluate controls that are in place whereas other firms do not rely on internal controls at all and plan their audits as if there are no controls in place or consider controls as not effective. Evaluate each of these approaches to assess a client’s internal controls from an external auditor’s perception. Include in your evaluation: What effect, if...

  • Every audit firm has its approach for understanding a client’s internal control structure. Some firms use...

    Every audit firm has its approach for understanding a client’s internal control structure. Some firms use a standardized internal control questionnaire to evaluate controls that are in place whereas other firms do not rely on internal controls at all and plan their audits as if there are no controls in place or consider controls as not effective. Evaluate each of these approaches to assess a client’s internal controls from an external auditor’s perception. Include in your evaluation: What effect, if...

  • Question 1 (12 marks) Public accounting firms perform audits of financial statements. CAS 220, Quality Control...

    Question 1 (12 marks) Public accounting firms perform audits of financial statements. CAS 220, Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements addresses the specific responsibilities of the auditor regarding quality control procedures for an audit of financial statements. All firms that perform audits must have standards for audit fieldwork and quality control procedures that must be followed by all staff performing an audit of financial statements. Required: i. Briefly outline the requirements for Quality Control for an Audit of...

  • Which of the following matters would an auditor most likely consider to be a significant deficiency to be communicated to the audit committee

    1. Which of the following matters would an auditor most likely consider to be a significant deficiency to be communicated to the audit committee? A. Management's failure to renegotiate unfavorable long-term purchase commitments.B. Recurring operating losses that may indicate going concern problems.C. Evidence of a lack of objectivity by those responsible for accounting decisions.D. Management's current plans to reduce its ownership equity in the entity. 2. After obtaining an understanding of internal control and arriving at a preliminary assessed level...

  • The limitations of an audit are NOT caused by ________. A. the nature of financial reporting....

    The limitations of an audit are NOT caused by ________. A. the nature of financial reporting. B. the nature of audit procedures. C. the need for the audit to be conducted within a reasonable period of time at a reasonable cost. D. a guarantee that the financial statements are free from error 2.5 points QUESTION 4 In an unqualified audit report on the financial statements of a public company, ACC562what does the first statement of the opinion paragraph state? A....

  • Review the Audit report (found in the 10-K) for the following two companies. Highlight or summarize...

    Review the Audit report (found in the 10-K) for the following two companies. Highlight or summarize differences between the reports (other than the name of Company, Audit Firm, Financial statement period covered). Note: 1. Each Company may have two audit reports (one opinion on financial statements and one for audit of internal controls) or the two opinions may be combined into one report. 2. You are not required to review the entire 10-K. Find the audit report in the 10-K...

  • KID CASTLE EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION AND BROCK, SCHECHTER & POLAKOFF LLP, PCAOB 10 3, 4, 5, 7,...

    KID CASTLE EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION AND BROCK, SCHECHTER & POLAKOFF LLP, PCAOB 10 3, 4, 5, 7, 8) PROFESSIONAL SKEPTICISM 7-58 General Background. On May 22, 2012, the audit firm of Brock Schechter & Polakoff LLP (hereafter BSP) was censured and fined 820,000 by the PCAOB in relation to its audits of public compa nies located in Taiwan and China. These public companies were listed on U.S. stock exchanges. James Waggoner, BSP's director of accounting and auditing, was the BSP auditor...

  • The 'seduction' of fraud For decades, the anti-fraud profession has relied on the Fraud Triangle[1] to...

    The 'seduction' of fraud For decades, the anti-fraud profession has relied on the Fraud Triangle[1] to explain white collar crimes such as embezzlement. With its key attributes of pressure, opportunity and rationalization, the fraud triangle, attributed to Dr. Donald Cressey, was first introduced in the 1950s. He used it to explain the mind-set of persons committing embezzlement and similar breaches of trust. Since then, many professional organizations, such as the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), the American Institute of...

  • write a summary after that answer the questions CASE 3.3 United Way of America In 1887,...

    write a summary after that answer the questions CASE 3.3 United Way of America In 1887, several of Denver's community and religious leaders established the Charity Organization Society. During its first year of operation, the organization raised a little more than $20,000, which it then distributed to several local charities. The charity-of-charities fundraising concept spread across the United States over the fol- lowing decades. After several name changes, the original Denver-based organization adopted the name United Way in 1963. United...

  • Case Study Analysis: Fred Stern & Company, Inc. (Knapp): In the business world of the Roaring...

    Case Study Analysis: Fred Stern & Company, Inc. (Knapp): In the business world of the Roaring Twenties, the schemes and scams of flimflam artists and confidence men were legendary. The absence of a strong regulatory system at the federal level to police the securities markets—the Securities and Exchange Commission was not established until 1934—aided, if not encouraged, financial frauds of all types. In all likelihood, the majority of individuals involved in business during the 1920s were scrupulously honest. Nevertheless, the...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT