Identify the level of measurement of each of the following variables: a)The amount of resistance a suspect displays toward the police, measured as not resistant, somewhat resistant, or very resistant B)The number of times someone has shoplifted in her or his life C)The number of times someone has shoplifted, measured as 0–2, 3–5, or 6 or more D)The type of attorney a criminal defendant has at trial, measured as privately retained or publicly funded E)In a sample of juvenile delinquents, whether or not those juveniles have substance abuse disorders F)Prosecutors’ charging decisions, measured as filed charges and did not file charges G)In a sample of offenders sentenced to prison, the number of days in their sentences
a)The amount of resistance a suspect displays toward the police, measured as not resistant, somewhat resistant, or very resistant
The variable is categorical variable and they can be ordered. So, the level of measurement is ordinal
B)The number of times someone has shoplifted in her or his life
The variable is a discrete variable with values 0, 1, 2,.... . The difference between variables is defined. The absolute zero for the variable is defined. So, the level of measurement is ratio
C)The number of times someone has shoplifted, measured as 0–2, 3–5, or 6 or more
The variable is a categorical variable with values 0–2, 3–5, or 6 or more . The difference between variables is not defined. The absolute zero for the variable is not defined. They can be ordered. So, the level of measurement is ordinal.
D)The type of attorney a criminal defendant has at trial, measured as privately retained or publicly funded
The variable is categorical variable with 2 levels - privately retained or publicly funded and they cannot be ordered. So, the level of measurement is nominal
E)In a sample of juvenile delinquents, whether or not those juveniles have substance abuse disorders
The variable is categorical variable with 2 levels - have substance abuse disorders or do not have substance abuse disorders. They cannot be ordered. So, the level of measurement is nominal
F)Prosecutors’ charging decisions, measured as filed charges and did not file charges
The variable is categorical variable with 2 levels - filed charges and did not file charges. They cannot be ordered. So, the level of measurement is nominal
G)In a sample of offenders sentenced to prison, the number of days in their sentences
The variable is a discrete variable with values 1, 2,.... . The difference between variables is defined. The absolute zero for the variable is not defined because the offenders is sentenced to prison for days greater than 0. So, the level of measurement is interval.
Identify the level of measurement of each of the following variables: a)The amount of resistance a...
write a summary after that answer the
questions
CASE 3.3 United Way of America In 1887, several of Denver's community and religious leaders established the Charity Organization Society. During its first year of operation, the organization raised a little more than $20,000, which it then distributed to several local charities. The charity-of-charities fundraising concept spread across the United States over the fol- lowing decades. After several name changes, the original Denver-based organization adopted the name United Way in 1963. United...
CASE 20 Enron: Not Accounting for the Future* INTRODUCTION Once upon a time, there was a gleaming office tower in Houston, Texas. In front of that gleaming tower was a giant "E" slowly revolving, flashing in the hot Texas sun. But in 2001, the Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, would collapse under a mountain of debt that had been concealed through a complex scheme of off-balance-sheet partnerships. Forced to declare bankruptcy, the energy firm...
Case: Enron: Questionable Accounting Leads to CollapseIntroductionOnce upon a time, there was a gleaming office tower in Houston, Texas. In front of that gleaming tower was a giant “E,” slowly revolving, flashing in the hot Texas sun. But in 2001, the Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, would collapse under a mountain of debt that had been concealed through a complex scheme of off-balance-sheet partnerships. Forced to declare bankruptcy, the energy firm laid off 4,000...