The following selected transactions relate to contingencies of Classical Tool Makers, Inc., which began operations in July 2021. Classical’s fiscal year ends on December 31. Financial statements are issued in April 2022. Classical’s products carry a one-year warranty against manufacturer’s defects. Based on previous experience, warranty costs are expected to approximate 2% of sales. Sales were $3.3 million (all credit) for 2021. Actual warranty expenditures were $22,800 and were recorded as warranty expense when incurred. Although no customer accounts have been shown to be uncollectible, Classical estimates that 2% of credit sales will eventually prove uncollectible. In December 2021, the state of Tennessee filed suit against Classical, seeking penalties for violations of clean air laws. On January 23, 2022, Classical reached a settlement with state authorities to pay $2.8 million in penalties. Classical is the plaintiff in a $5.3 million lawsuit filed against a supplier. The suit is in final appeal and attorneys advise that it is virtually certain that Classical will win the case and be awarded $3.8 million. In November 2021, Classical became aware of a design flaw in an industrial saw that poses a potential electrical hazard. A product recall appears unavoidable. Such an action would likely cost the company $630,000. Classical offered $20 cash rebates on a new model of jigsaw. Customers must mail in a proof-of-purchase seal from the package plus the cash register receipt to receive the rebate. Experience suggests that 65% of the rebates will be claimed. Eleven thousand and three hundred of the jigsaws were sold in 2021. Total rebates to customers in 2021 were $118,000 and were recorded as promotional expense when paid.
Required: 1-a Prepare the year-end entries for any amounts that should be recorded as a result of each of the above contingencies.
1-b Indicate whether a disclosure note is needed for the above transactions.
Firstly, we need to understand the Law - IAS 37:
"A provision shall be recognized if the following criteria are
fulfilled:
No provision, however, is recognized for costs that need to be incurred to operate in the future. Also, an obligation always involves another party to whom the obligation is owed (even if this party is unknown)."
Let us now break down the multiple events mentioned in the
question:
(i) Warranty Costs
(ii) Bad Debts (Un-collectible credit sales)
(iii) Case with State of Tennessee for violation of clean air
laws
(iv) Case where "Classical" is the plaintiff
(v) Product recall
(vi) Rebate on new model of jigsaw
Now, let us examine each of the above mentioned situations individually and decide on the entry to be recorded, or the disclosure to be made, or both:
Case (i) - Warranty costs:
Total sales for the year = $3,300,000
Expected warranty cost % = 2%
Therefore, expected warranty cost in $ = 3,3000*2% = $66,000
Actual warranty expenditure already recorded in the books =
$22,800
Therefore, balance warranty expenses to be recorded in the books =
$43,200
(Note: Warranty costs satisfies all the conditions covered under
IAS 37, therefore the same should be recognized as provision as on
year end date.)
The journal entry for the same is as follows:
Warranty expenses a/c ..................... Dr 43,200
To Provision for Expenses 43,200
(Being balance warranty expenses recorded based on past
estimates)
No Disclosure note is required for this transaction
Case (ii) - Bad Debts:
Total sales for the year = $3,300,000
Expected Bad debt cost % = 2%
Therefore, expected Bad debt cost in $ = 3,3000*2% = $66,000
(Note: Bad Debts costs satisfies all the conditions covered under
IAS 37, therefore the same should be recognized as provision as on
year end date)
The journal entry for the same is as follows:
Bad Debts a/c ..................... Dr 66,000
To Provision for Bad Debts 66,000
(Being Bad debt expenses @2% of sales recorded based on past
estimates)
No Disclosure note is required for this transaction
Case (iii) - Case with State of Tennessee for violation of clean
air laws
Case filed date - December 2021
Fiscal closing for "Classical" - December 2021
Settlement reached on - January 2022
Financials if "Classical prepared and issued on - April 2022
From the above, it is clear that all the conditions of IAS 37
are being satisfied. The actual amount of settlement, which has
been agreed upon for in Jan 2022, has to be recorded as a provision
for the fiscal ending 2021.
The journal entry for the same is as follows:
Legal Expenses a/c ..................... Dr 2,800,000
To Provision for Expenses 2,800,000
(Being provision created for settlement of case with the State of
Tennessee for violation of Clean Air)
Further, the Disclosure note to be given for the same is as
under:
"The Sate of Tennessee has filed a suit of law against the company
in the month of December 2021, for the violation of clean air laws.
The company has begun negotiations with the State immediately and
arrived at a settlement amount of $2.8 million as on 23rd January
2022. This agreed upon sum has been recorded as a provision for
this fiscal as the case was filed in this year."
Case (iv) - Case where "Classical" is the plaintiff:
Alternative 1: As the question clearly states, that the suit is
still in the final appeal stage, and no verdict has yet been
reached by the court of law, no treatment for the same is to be
made in the books of the company on account of prudent accounting
principles.
In this approach, the following Disclosure note shall be given
-
"The company had filed a suit against one of its suppliers for $5.3
million. The suit is in the final appeal stage and a final verdict
of the Court of law is yet to be made. However, our attorneys are
virtually certain that the case will be won by the company and are
expecting a payout of $3.8 million."
Alternative 2: The virtual certainty provided by the attorneys
may be construed as provided by an expert, and therefore can be
used as a basis for recording the sum as a receipt for the current
fiscal itself.
In this approach, the following journal entry is to be
recorded:
Supplier a/c .................. Dr 3,800,000
To Other Income a/c 3,800,000
(Being income accrued to the company on the basis of virtual
certainty provided by attorneys, in the suit filed against the
supplier)
Further, the Disclosure note to be given for the same is as
under:
"The company had filed a suit against one of its suppliers for $5.3
million. The suit is in the final appeal stage and a final verdict
of the Court of law is yet to be made. However, our attorneys are
virtually certain that the case will be won by the company and are
expecting a payout of $3.8 million, hence the same is recorded as
'Other Income' in the current fiscal itself. The balance $1.5
million is the contingent income of the company which shall be
recognized when the final verdict of the same is received."
Case (v) - Product recall:
It has clearly been provided that, the product recall is
un-avoidable, and the company is aware of the same in the month of
Nov 2021 itself, therefore all the conditions of IAS 37 are
satisfied.
Therefore, the journal entry for the same is as follows:
Product recall expenses a/c ..................... Dr 630,000
To Provision for Expenses 630,000
(Being provision made for recall of product due to flaw in design
of product.)
Case (vi) Rebate on new model of jigsaw
Total Jigsaws sold = 11,300
Total % of customers who would claim rebate = 65%
Therefore, total jigsaws for which rebate will be payable = 7,345
(11300*65%)
Rebate to be provided on each jigsaw = $20
Therefore, estimated rebate amount = $146,900 (20*7345)
Amount already accounted for = $118,000
Therefore, balance amount to be recorded = $28,900
The journal entry for the same is as follows:
Promotional expenses a/c ..................... Dr 28,900
To Provision for Expenses 28,900
(Being provision made for the balance amount of rebate to be
provided on the basis of past experience)
The following selected transactions relate to contingencies of Classical Tool Makers, Inc., which began operations in...
The following selected transactions relate to contingencies of Classical Tool Makers, Inc., which began operations in July 2021. Classical's fiscal year ends on December 31. Financial statements are issued in April 2022. 1. Classical's products carry a one-year warranty against manufacturer's defects. Based on previous experience, warranty costs are expected to approximate 3% of sales. Sales were $3.7 million (all credit) for 2021. Actual warranty expenditures were $49,400 and were recorded as warranty expense when incurred. 2. Although no customer...
The following selected transactions relate to contingencies of Classical Tool Makers, Inc., which began operations in July 2021. Classical's fiscal year ends on December 31. Financial statements are issued in April 2022. 1. Classical's products carry a one-year warranty against manufacturer's defects. Based on previous experience, warranty costs are expected to approximate 3% of sales. Sales were $2.8 million (all credit) for 2021. Actual warranty expenditures were $31,600 and were recorded as warranty expense when incurred. 2. Although no customer...
The following selected transactions relate to contingencies of Classical Tool Makers, Inc., which began operations in July 2021. Classical's fiscal year ends on December 31. Financial statements are issued in April 2022. 1. Classical's products carry a one-year warranty against manufacturer's defects. Based on previous experience, warranty costs are expected to approximate 3% of sales. Sales were $2.3 million (all credit) for 2021. Actual warranty expenditures were $20,100 and were recorded as warranty expense when incurred. 2. Although no customer...
The following selected transactions relate to contingencies of Classical Tool Makers, Inc., which began operations in July 2016. Classical's fiscal year ends on December 31. Financial statements are issued in April 2017. 1. Classical's products carry a one-year warranty against manufacturer's defects. Based on previous experience, warranty costs are expected to approximate 4% of sales. Sales were $2 million (all credit) for 2016. Actual warranty expenditures were $30,800 and were recorded as warranty expense when incurred. 2. Although no customer...
The following selected transactions relate to contingencies of Classical Tool Makers, Inc., which began operations in July 2016. Classical's fiscal year ends on December 31. Financial statements are issued in April 2017. 1. Classical's products carry a one-year warranty against manufacturer's defects. Based on previous experience, warranty costs are expected to approximate 4% of sales. Sales were $2 million (all credit) for 2016. Actual warranty expenditures were $30,800 and were recorded as warranty expense when incurred. 2. Although no customer...
The following selected transactions relate to contingencies of Classical Tool Makers, Inc., which began operations in July 2018. Classical's fiscal year ends on December 31. Financial statements are issued in April 2019. 1. Classical's products carry a one-year warranty against manufacturer's defects. Based on previous experience, warranty costs are expected to approximate 4 % of sales. Sales were $2.7 million (all credit) for 2018. Actual warranty expenditures were $43,500 and were recorded as warranty expense when incurred. 2. Although no customer accounts...
ctice Exercises Chapter 13 The following selected transactions relate to contingencies of Classical Tool Makers, Inc., which began operations in July 2021. Classical's fiscal year ends on December 31. Financial statements are issued in April 2022 1. Classical's products carry a one-year warranty against manufacturer's defects. Based on previous experience, warranty costs are expected to approximate 4% of sales. Sales were $2 million (all credit) for 2021. Actual warranty expenditures were $30,800 and were recorded as warranty expense when incurred....
Chapter 13 i Seved B The following selected transactions relate to contingencies of Classical Tool Makers, Inc., which began operations in July 2021. Classica's fiscal year ends on December 31. Financial statements are issued in April 2022. Jok int ences 1. Classical's products carry a one year warranty against manufacturer's defects. Based on previous experience, warranty costs are expected to approximate 4% of sales. Sales were $2.5 million (all credit) for 2021. Actual warranty expenditures were $40,000 and were recorded...
PLEASE PUT SOLUTION IN THE SAME FORMAT AS THE IMAGE.
THANK YOU!
Exercise 13-20 (Algo) Various transactions involving contingencles (LO13-5, 13-6) The following selected transactions relate to contingencles of Classical Tool Makers, Inc., which began operations In July 2021. Classical's fiscal year ends on December 31. Financial statements are issued in April 2022 1. Classical's products carry a one-year warranty against manufacturer's defects. Based on previous experience, warranty costs are expected to approximate 3% of sales. Sales were $2.3 million...
Camden Biotechnology began operations in September 2021. The following selected transactions relate to liabilities of the company for September 2021 through March 2022 Camden's fiscal year ends on December 31. Its financial statements are issued in April. 2021 a On September 5, opened checking accounts at Second Commercial Bank and negotiated a short-term line of credit of up to $16,000,000 at the bank's prime rate (9.5% at the time). The company will pay no commitment fees. b. On October 1,...