Explain the coefficients and check the model assumptions of the table below.
Week | Sales | Direct Mail | Corrected |
1 | $121,230 | 9800 | 42047 |
2 | $212,090 | 21200 | 9800 |
3 | $99,980 | 561000 | 21200 |
4 | $429,780 | 41300 | 56100 |
5 | $496,370 | 26700 | 41300 |
6 | $316,450 | 32100 | 26700 |
7 | $286,980 | 52900 | 32100 |
8 | $496,110 | 73100 | 52900 |
9 | $389,080 | 69500 | 73100 |
10 | $787,350 | 54400 | 69500 |
11 | $446,310 | 8700 | 54400 |
12 | $389,410 | 29900 | 8700 |
13 | $420,040 | 24300 | 29900 |
14 | $629,380 | 42300 | 24300 |
15 | $419,370 | 82000 | 42300 |
16 | $740,070 | 60200 | 82000 |
17 | $498,730 | 48900 | 60200 |
18 | $621,780 | 27900 | 48900 |
19 | $317,620 | 37600 | 27900 |
20 | $427,270 | 68621 | 37600 |
using excel>data analysis>Regression
we have
SUMMARY OUTPUT | ||||||
Regression Statistics | ||||||
Multiple R | 0.651648 | |||||
R Square | 0.424645 | |||||
Adjusted R Square | 0.356956 | |||||
Standard Error | 144300.6 | |||||
Observations | 20 | |||||
ANOVA | ||||||
df | SS | MS | F | Significance F | ||
Regression | 2 | 2.61E+11 | 1.31E+11 | 6.273495 | 0.009109 | |
Residual | 17 | 3.54E+11 | 2.08E+10 | |||
Total | 19 | 6.15E+11 | ||||
Coefficients | Standard Error | t Stat | P-value | Lower 95% | Upper 95% | |
Intercept | 251606.7 | 82281.74 | 3.057868 | 0.007118 | 78007.44 | 425206 |
Direct Mall | -0.41978 | 0.285255 | -1.47159 | 0.159402 | -1.02161 | 0.182057 |
Corrected | 4.862824 | 1.661833 | 2.926181 | 0.009424 | 1.356663 | 8.368984 |
the regression equation is
Sales = 251606.7 -0,41978 Direct Mall +4.862824 Corrected
Explanation of coefficients
for every one unit increase in Direct Mall, there is 0.41978 decrease in sales
for every one unit increase in Corrected, there is a 4.862824 increase in sales.
Assumptions of normality is satisfied
Explain the coefficients and check the model assumptions of the table below. Week Sales Direct Mail...
The client is thinking of spending $32,500 in direct mail next week. What is your best estimate of what the following week’s sales will be at that level of spending? Week Sales Direct Mail Corrected 1 $121,230 9800 42047 2 $212,090 21200 9800 3 $99,980 561000 21200 4 $429,780 41300 56100 5 $496,370 26700 41300 6 $316,450 32100 26700 7 $286,980 52900 32100 8 $496,110 73100 52900 9 $389,080 69500 73100 10 $787,350 54400 69500 11 $446,310 8700 54400 12...
The client wants to know the probability that the actual relationship between Direct Mail spending and Sales is greater than 6.5. What is this probability? Week Sales Direct Mail Lagged Direct Mail 1 $121,230 9800 42047 2 $212,090 21200 9800 3 $99,980 561000 21200 4 $429,780 41300 56100 5 $496,370 26700 41300 6 $316,450 32100 26700 7 $286,980 52900 32100 8 $496,110 73100 52900 9 $389,080 69500 73100 10 $787,350 54400 69500 11 $446,310 8700 54400 12 $389,410 29900 8700...
What hypothesis does the p-value of the coefficient of the slope test? If the p-value is small, what does that mean? Week Sales Direct Mail Corrected 1 $121,230 9800 42047 2 $212,090 21200 9800 3 $99,980 561000 21200 4 $429,780 41300 56100 5 $496,370 26700 41300 6 $316,450 32100 26700 7 $286,980 52900 32100 8 $496,110 73100 52900 9 $389,080 69500 73100 10 $787,350 54400 69500 11 $446,310 8700 54400 12 $389,410 29900 8700 13 $420,040 24300 29900 14 $629,380...
How likely is it that a true relationship between Corrected and sales is “managerially irrelevant” – that is, that the actual coefficient is close enough to 0 that it is not relevant to worry about from a managerial point of view? Assume that “around 0” means in the range of [-0.1, 0.1]. Week Sales Direct Mail Corrected 1 $121,230 9800 42047 2 $212,090 21200 9800 3 $99,980 561000 21200 4 $429,780 41300 56100 5 $496,370 26700 41300 6 $316,450 32100...