Question

QUESTION ONE Financial engineering has been disparaged as nothing more than paper shuffling. Critics argue that...

QUESTION ONE

  1. Financial engineering has been disparaged as nothing more than paper shuffling. Critics argue that resources used for rearranging wealth (i.e. bundling and unbundling financial assets) might be better spent on creating wealth ( i.e. creating real assets)

Evaluate this criticism.                                                                      (15 Marks)

  1. You are given the following data about available investments:

State of the Economy

Probability

Return (A)

Return (B)

Strong Boom

0.15

-0.60

0.75

Weak Boom

0.20

-0.30

0.50

Average

0.05

-0.10

0.15

Weak Recession

0.40

0.20

-0.10

Strong Recession

0.20

0.80

-0.35

Compute and fully interpret the following for these investments:

  1. Mean rate of return for each investment                                                                     (5 Marks)
  2. Standard deviation for each investment.                                                                    (5 Marks)
  3. Coefficient of variation for each investment.                                                                    (3 Marks)
  4. Covariance among the rates of return.                                                                            (4 Marks)
  5. Correlation coefficient of the rates of return.                                                                            (3 Marks)
  6. Briefly explain the difference in assumptions underlying Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)                                                                         (5 Marks) [TOTAL: 40 MARKS]
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Answers

I. Calculation of mean rate of return of each investment

State

of Economy

Probability

(a)

Return on A

(b)

(%)

Return on B

(c)

(%)

Mean Return A

(d= a*b)

(%)

Mean Return B

(e= a*c)

(%)

Strong Boom 0.15 -60 75 -9 11.25
Weak Boom 0.20 -30 50 -6 10
Average 0.05 -10 15 -5 0.75
Weak Recession 0.40 20 -10 8 -4
Strong Recession 0.20 80 -35 16 -7
Total 8.50 11.00

II. a. Calculation of standard deviation of A

State

of Economy

Probability

(a)

Return on A

(b)

(%)

Mean Return A

(c)

(%)

Calculation

(b-c)2*a=d

Strong Boom 0.15 -60 8.50 703.84
Weak Boom 0.20 -30 8.50 296.45
Average 0.05 -10 8.50 17.11
Weak Recession 0.40 20 8.50 52.90
Strong Recession 0.20 80 8.50 1022.45
Total 2092.75

Standard Deviation of A= \gamma 2092.75

= 45.75

b. Calculation of standard deviation of b

State

of Economy

Probability

(a)

Return on B

(b)

(%)

Mean Return B

(c)

(%)

Calculation

(b-c)2*a=d

Strong Boom 0.15 75 11 614.40
Weak Boom 0.20 50 11 304.20
Average 0.05 15 11 0.80
Weak Recession 0.40 -10 11 176.40
Strong Recession 0.20 -35 11 423.20
Total 1519.00

Standard Deviation of B= \gamma 1519

= 38.97

III. Calculation of coefficient of Variation

= Standard Deviation/Expected Return

coefficient of Variation A= 45.75/8.5

= 5.38

coefficient of Variation B= 38.97/11

= 3.54

  

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
QUESTION ONE Financial engineering has been disparaged as nothing more than paper shuffling. Critics argue that...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • investment analysis a) Financial engineering has been disparaged as nothing more than paper shuffling. Critics argue...

    investment analysis a) Financial engineering has been disparaged as nothing more than paper shuffling. Critics argue that resources used for rearranging wealth (.e. bundling and unbundling financial assets) might be better spent on creating wealth (i.e. creating real assets) Evaluate this criticism. (15 Marks) b) You are given the following data about available investments: State of the Economy Probability Return (A) Return (B) Strong Boom 0.15 -0.60 0.75 Weak Boom 0.20 -0.30 0.50 Average 0.05 -0.10 0.15 Weak Recession 0.40...

  • investment analysis QUESTION ONE a) Financial engineering has been disparaged as nothing more than paper shuffling....

    investment analysis QUESTION ONE a) Financial engineering has been disparaged as nothing more than paper shuffling. Critics argue that resources used for rearranging wealth (i.e. bundling and unbundling financial assets) might be better spent on creating wealth (ie. creating real assets) Evaluate this criticism. (15 Marks) b) You are given the following data about available investments: State of the Economy Probability Return (A) Return (B) Strong Boom 0.15 -0.60 0.75 Weak Boom 0.20 0.50 Average 0.05 0.15 -0.10 Weak Recession...

  • Question #2: Optimal Risky Portfolio [22 Points] You are trying to decide whether to buy Vanguard's...

    Question #2: Optimal Risky Portfolio [22 Points] You are trying to decide whether to buy Vanguard's Large Stock Equity Fund and/or its Treasury Bond Fund (both are risky assets). You believe that next year involves several possible scenarios to which you have assigned probabilities. You have also estimated the expected returns for each of the two funds for each scenario. Your spreadsheet looks like the following: Probability Next Year's Possibilities Large Stock Equity Fund Expected Rate of Return Bond Fund...

  • CASE 1-5 Financial Statement Ratio Computation Refer to Campbell Soup Company's financial Campbell Soup statements in...

    CASE 1-5 Financial Statement Ratio Computation Refer to Campbell Soup Company's financial Campbell Soup statements in Appendix A. Required: Compute the following ratios for Year 11. Liquidity ratios: Asset utilization ratios:* a. Current ratio n. Cash turnover b. Acid-test ratio 0. Accounts receivable turnover c. Days to sell inventory p. Inventory turnover d. Collection period 4. Working capital turnover Capital structure and solvency ratios: 1. Fixed assets turnover e. Total debt to total equity s. Total assets turnover f. Long-term...

  • CASE 20 Enron: Not Accounting for the Future* INTRODUCTION Once upon a time, there was a...

    CASE 20 Enron: Not Accounting for the Future* INTRODUCTION Once upon a time, there was a gleaming office tower in Houston, Texas. In front of that gleaming tower was a giant "E" slowly revolving, flashing in the hot Texas sun. But in 2001, the Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, would collapse under a mountain of debt that had been concealed through a complex scheme of off-balance-sheet partnerships. Forced to declare bankruptcy, the energy firm...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT