QUESTION ONE
Evaluate this criticism. (15 Marks)
State of the Economy |
Probability |
Return (A) |
Return (B) |
Strong Boom |
0.15 |
-0.60 |
0.75 |
Weak Boom |
0.20 |
-0.30 |
0.50 |
Average |
0.05 |
-0.10 |
0.15 |
Weak Recession |
0.40 |
0.20 |
-0.10 |
Strong Recession |
0.20 |
0.80 |
-0.35 |
Compute and fully interpret the following for these investments:
Answers
I. Calculation of mean rate of return of each investment
State of Economy |
Probability (a) |
Return on A (b) (%) |
Return on B (c) (%) |
Mean Return A (d= a*b) (%) |
Mean Return B (e= a*c) (%) |
Strong Boom | 0.15 | -60 | 75 | -9 | 11.25 |
Weak Boom | 0.20 | -30 | 50 | -6 | 10 |
Average | 0.05 | -10 | 15 | -5 | 0.75 |
Weak Recession | 0.40 | 20 | -10 | 8 | -4 |
Strong Recession | 0.20 | 80 | -35 | 16 | -7 |
Total | 8.50 | 11.00 |
II. a. Calculation of standard deviation of A
State of Economy |
Probability (a) |
Return on A (b) (%) |
Mean Return A (c) (%) |
Calculation (b-c)2*a=d |
Strong Boom | 0.15 | -60 | 8.50 | 703.84 |
Weak Boom | 0.20 | -30 | 8.50 | 296.45 |
Average | 0.05 | -10 | 8.50 | 17.11 |
Weak Recession | 0.40 | 20 | 8.50 | 52.90 |
Strong Recession | 0.20 | 80 | 8.50 | 1022.45 |
Total | 2092.75 |
Standard Deviation of A=
= 45.75
b. Calculation of standard deviation of b
State of Economy |
Probability (a) |
Return on B (b) (%) |
Mean Return B (c) (%) |
Calculation (b-c)2*a=d |
Strong Boom | 0.15 | 75 | 11 | 614.40 |
Weak Boom | 0.20 | 50 | 11 | 304.20 |
Average | 0.05 | 15 | 11 | 0.80 |
Weak Recession | 0.40 | -10 | 11 | 176.40 |
Strong Recession | 0.20 | -35 | 11 | 423.20 |
Total | 1519.00 |
Standard Deviation of B=
= 38.97
III. Calculation of coefficient of Variation
= Standard Deviation/Expected Return
coefficient of Variation A= 45.75/8.5
= 5.38
coefficient of Variation B= 38.97/11
= 3.54
QUESTION ONE Financial engineering has been disparaged as nothing more than paper shuffling. Critics argue that...
investment analysis a) Financial engineering has been disparaged as nothing more than paper shuffling. Critics argue that resources used for rearranging wealth (.e. bundling and unbundling financial assets) might be better spent on creating wealth (i.e. creating real assets) Evaluate this criticism. (15 Marks) b) You are given the following data about available investments: State of the Economy Probability Return (A) Return (B) Strong Boom 0.15 -0.60 0.75 Weak Boom 0.20 -0.30 0.50 Average 0.05 -0.10 0.15 Weak Recession 0.40...
investment analysis QUESTION ONE a) Financial engineering has been disparaged as nothing more than paper shuffling. Critics argue that resources used for rearranging wealth (i.e. bundling and unbundling financial assets) might be better spent on creating wealth (ie. creating real assets) Evaluate this criticism. (15 Marks) b) You are given the following data about available investments: State of the Economy Probability Return (A) Return (B) Strong Boom 0.15 -0.60 0.75 Weak Boom 0.20 0.50 Average 0.05 0.15 -0.10 Weak Recession...
Question #2: Optimal Risky Portfolio [22 Points] You are trying to decide whether to buy Vanguard's Large Stock Equity Fund and/or its Treasury Bond Fund (both are risky assets). You believe that next year involves several possible scenarios to which you have assigned probabilities. You have also estimated the expected returns for each of the two funds for each scenario. Your spreadsheet looks like the following: Probability Next Year's Possibilities Large Stock Equity Fund Expected Rate of Return Bond Fund...
CASE 1-5 Financial Statement Ratio Computation Refer to Campbell Soup Company's financial Campbell Soup statements in Appendix A. Required: Compute the following ratios for Year 11. Liquidity ratios: Asset utilization ratios:* a. Current ratio n. Cash turnover b. Acid-test ratio 0. Accounts receivable turnover c. Days to sell inventory p. Inventory turnover d. Collection period 4. Working capital turnover Capital structure and solvency ratios: 1. Fixed assets turnover e. Total debt to total equity s. Total assets turnover f. Long-term...
CASE 20 Enron: Not Accounting for the Future* INTRODUCTION Once upon a time, there was a gleaming office tower in Houston, Texas. In front of that gleaming tower was a giant "E" slowly revolving, flashing in the hot Texas sun. But in 2001, the Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, would collapse under a mountain of debt that had been concealed through a complex scheme of off-balance-sheet partnerships. Forced to declare bankruptcy, the energy firm...