One of the standard solutions had an abnormally low absorbance reading, causing a less positive slope for the calibration curve data plot.
A. The equilibrium concentration of FeSCN2+in the unknown solution as determined from the graph will be [ Select ] ["higher than", "the same as", "lower than"] the real one.
This happens because absorbance is [ Select ] ["inversely", "directly"] proportional to concentration with the slope acting as the proportionality constant.
A = slope [ Select ] ["/", "x"] concentration
If the slope appears to be lower, the same absorbance reading will on the graph correspond to [ Select ] ["lower", "higher"] concentration.
B. The calculated K for the equilibrium be [ Select ] ["same as", "higher than", "lower than"] the actual one due to the erred data plot.
K= [ Select ] ["[FeSCN2+]", "[SCN-]", "[Fe2+]"] / [ Select ] ["[Fe2+]", "[SCN-]", "[FeSCN2+]"] [ Select ] ["[Fe2+]", "[SCN-]", "[FeSCN2+]"]
The numerator of the fraction becomes [ Select ] ["smaller", "larger"] , the concentrations in the denominator become [ Select ] ["larger", "smaller"] , and these result in the entire K value [ Select ] ["decreasing", "increasing"]
A PART
S1-lower than
S2-directly
S3- ×(multiplied by)
S4- higher
B PART
S1-lower than
S2-FeSCN2+
S3-Fe2+
S4-SCN-
S5 smaller
S6-larger
S7-decreasing
According to beer Lambert's law absorbance is equal to product of absorption coefficient , concentration and path length .
Here coefficient and path length are treated as constant slope , here absorption changes according to concentration
One of the standard solutions had an abnormally low absorbance reading, causing a less positive slope...
the guiding questions. the max absorbance is 460. Guiding questions complex turque . Compare the molar absorptivity coefficients you obtained with SCN and Fe" as limiting reagents. Would you expect them to be the same? Why or why not? (Week 1) • The accepted molar absorptivity coefficient for FeSCN is 7.0x10' M'cm''. Find the bias and relative bias of your values and suggest possible sources of errors. (Week 1) • Which molar absorptivity coefficient will you use to calculate the...
I had clearer images. Part 1 - Making Standard solutions. 1. Into a clean, dry beaker combine the solutions from the table for each calibration solution using the appropriate pipettes. Pour the contents of the beaker into a provided cuvettes (do not fill the cuvettes to the top). Pour any excess from the sample beaker into a waste beaker, rinse the sample beaker, and continue making solutions until you have the blank and four solutions for the calibration. Calibration Solution...
plane is roughly level. Lay the spirit level across the two rails and level them using the levelling feet. Now put the spirit level along one rail and adjust the support rod to 2. 3. level the rail. se on the rails at the support rod end and mark its position. Then make similar mark 1.2 meters along the rail. easure up from the bench to the underside of the front rail at each mark and record the heights a,...
This is from a Study of Buffer Solutions and pH of Salt Solutions Lab. I calculated Ka to be 3.2*10^-5. Why is my value larger than the standard value? Procedure: 10. How does your calculated value of Ka compare with the standard value of Ka for acetic acid? Discuss why your value may be larger or smaller than the standard value. Caleutats Ka 3.2x 10-5) Cyato-s Learning Objectives: 1. To test the acidic and basic properties of ionic compounds 2....
7. Smokers are known to have about 50% higher CL than nonsmokers for theophylline. If the average observed AUC after administration of 300 mg IV theophylline in nonsmokers is 100 mg.hr/L, what is the expected AUC in smokers after administration of the same 300 mg dose? Theophylline undergoes linear pharmacokinetics 2. After administration of a single 400 mg dose of a drug, a linear plot of the serum concentration-time prorile on a semi-log graph paper showed a y-intercept of 1mg/mL...
I need help to write a nice introduction for experiment 6 please ( no hands write ) typing Thank you HEAT TREATMENT OF STEELS EXPERIMENT 6 EXPERIMENT 6 HEAT TREATMENT OF STEELS THEORY The Effect of Cooling Rate One of the most convenient methods for controlling the properties of a given steel, i.e., a steel whose composition is already fixed, consists of austenizing the steel and ten cooling to room temperature at some predetermined rate. A variation of cooling rates...
1)I need introduction will be different from this introduction but in the same subject and the same idea (with littel different) 2)Select the discussion ,results ,conclusion , methods and references from this search INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC& TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 2, ISSUE 9 SEPTEMBER 2013 ISSN 2277-8616 Dyes Removal From Textile Wastewater Using 1 PREFACE 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS the largest Bangladesh, the textile industry manufacturing industries. in every stage of textile industry 2.1 Sample and Adsorbents Collection various types...