Question

7. On July 1, 2013 Drake Ltd. purchased a patent from Jackson Inc. for $175,000. At that time the patent had 10 years of its
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Amortization of the patent for year ended March 31, 2014

= Cost of the patent (purchase price) / New estimated useful life

= $175000 / 7 years

= $25000

Therefore, the correct answer is option (d), $25000.

Note - Useful life estimate used by the previous owner is irrelevant if new owner estimates useful life again.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
7. On July 1, 2013 Drake Ltd. purchased a patent from Jackson Inc. for $175,000. At...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Andy Ltd acquires 100% interest in Irons Ltd. On 1 July 2013 Andy Ltd sells an...

    Andy Ltd acquires 100% interest in Irons Ltd. On 1 July 2013 Andy Ltd sells an item of plant to Irons Ltd for $145 000 when its’ carrying value in Andy Ltd’s accounts was $101 250 (cost $168 750, accumulated depreciation $67 500). This plant is assessed as having a remaining useful life of 6 years and the tax rate is 30%. Required: [use the space provided below] Provide consolidation journal entries for 30 June 2014 and 30 June 2015...

  • Question 4 Martinez Products Ltd, purchased a patent on January 1, 2017, for $870,000. At the...

    Question 4 Martinez Products Ltd, purchased a patent on January 1, 2017, for $870,000. At the time of the purchase, the patent had a remaining legal life of 15 years. In January, 2020, Martinez spent $28,000 successfully defending the patent in court. One of the other results of the court case was the discovery that the patent would only have a remaining useful life of 9 years. Martinez's year-end was December 31. Prepare the entries on the books of Martinez...

  • Fehr Co. purchased a patent from Wells Co. for $180,000 on July 1, 2006. Expenditures of...

    Fehr Co. purchased a patent from Wells Co. for $180,000 on July 1, 2006. Expenditures of $51,000 for successful litigation in defense of the patent were paid on July 1, 2009. Fehr estimates that the useful life of the patent will be 20 years from the date of acquisition. Required: What is the carrying value of the patent at December 31, 2009?       Presented below is information related to copyrights owned by Wamser Corporation at December 31, 2010.                         Cost                                                    ...

  • Bramble Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of...

    Bramble Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of air pollution. Bramble does not manufacture or sell the products and processes it develops. Instead, it conducts research and develops products and processes which it patents, and then assigns the patents to manufacturers on a royalty basis. Occasionally it sells a patent. The history of Bramble patent number 758-6002-1A is as follows. Date Activity Cost 2011–2012 Research conducted to develop precipitator $376,000 Jan. 2013...

  • Blue Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of...

    Blue Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of air pollution. Blue does not manufacture or sell the products and processes it develops. Instead, it conducts research and develops products and processes which it patents, and then assigns the patents to manufacturers on a royalty basis. Occasionally it sells a patent. The history of Blue patent number 758-6002-1A is as follows. Date Activity Cost 2011–2012 Research conducted to develop precipitator $368,000 Jan. 2013...

  • Martinez Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of...

    Martinez Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of air pollution. Martinez does not manufacture or sell the products and processes it develops. Instead, it conducts research and develops products and processes which it patents, and then assigns the patents to manufacturers on a royalty basis. Occasionally it sells a patent. The history of Martinez patent number 758-6002-1A is as follows. Date Activity Cost 2011–2012 Research conducted to develop precipitator $382,000 Jan. 2013...

  • Current Attempt in Progress Pina Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that...

    Current Attempt in Progress Pina Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of air pollution. Pina does not manufacture or sell the products and processes it develops. Instead, it conducts research and develops products and processes which it patents, and then assigns the patents to manufacturers on a royalty basis. Occasionally it sells a patent. The history of Pina patent number 758-6002-1A is as follows. Date Activity Cost 2011-2012 Research conducted to develop...

  • Janes Company provided the following information on intangible assets: A patent was purchased from the Lou...

    Janes Company provided the following information on intangible assets: A patent was purchased from the Lou Company for $1,550,000 on January 1, 2019. Janes estimated the remaining useful life of the patent to be 10 years. The patent was carried on Lou’s accounting records at a net book value of $520,000 when Lou sold it to Janes. During 2021, a franchise was purchased from the Rink Company for $670,000. The contractual life of the franchise is 10 years and Janes...

  • On 1 July 2013 David Ltd acquired all of the share capital of Goliath Limited for a consideration...

    On 1 July 2013 David Ltd acquired all of the share capital of Goliath Limited for a consideration of $500,000 cash and a brand that was held in their accounts at a book value of $10,000 but at 1 July 2013 had a fair value of $24,000. At that date all the identifiable assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value with the exception of: The inventory was all sold by 30/6/14. The remaining useful life of the plant is...

  • At 1 July 2014, Lobstar Ltd acquired the following non-current assets: Equipment $100 000 Vehicles $80...

    At 1 July 2014, Lobstar Ltd acquired the following non-current assets: Equipment $100 000 Vehicles $80 000 They are in different classes of non-current assets and are to be measured at fair value. The expected useful lives of vehicles and equipment are 5 years and 10 years, respectively. At 30 June 2015, the fair values of both assets were assessed. The equipment had a fair value of $82 000, and the vehicles, $70 000. The remaining useful lives were assessed...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT