Should government debts exist to provide a liquid security? Explain why or why not.
Government debts should exists to provide liquidity because it is the government security and it comes with highest level of liquidity after cash and with minimum credit risk. So, these types of debt securities are ideal to rescue firms when it needs to fullfil the short term debt obligation of the firms.
Further, holding government debt as a part of assets, other than the cash, is the part of cash management that helps firms to earn interest when idle cash is used to acquire government debt securities.
Should government debts exist to provide a liquid security? Explain why or why not.
Explain why a checksum or CRC, by itself, does not provide security.
Should government provide this good/service? Why, why not? Use microeconomic theory and data to support your argument. Use at least three academic sources. Cite sources why does the government provide public goods and services
why regulated industries should be required to follow security standards. Provide examples of industries that would fall under this category.
bigger government deficits and debts may cause indirect crowding out. explain what indirect crowding out is and identify ways in which bigger government deficits or debts may cause it.
Should Social Security and other government benefits be tied to a COLA?
If company changes their capital structure by increasing more debts, what are the benefits for government? Should government encourage more debts or less debts to corporate?
(6 marks) Evaluate the following limits, or explain why they do not exist. You should show your working, but formal proofs are not required for this question. You can assume any results which were proved in class. - i (P) 1,ਜਤ ਘi ( () wਤ 1 tan (੧) + 8 0 II! - % + +
Should the Federal Government raise the minimum wage? Why? Provide supporting documentation for your answer.) Follow APA style for in-text citations and references listed in your paragraph (all answers to postings must include source documentation
Who should have the responsibility of maintaining an individual's security, the individual or the government? What are the consequences of deciding in favor of either option?
provide example of a company with high liquid assets and why?