Question

5f6 Figure 6.4 Date Atas per Tony Veghaturing MARGINAL EXTERNAL cost of poacution Super AAARAA Costa - a batement 5 12 16 20
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

15) C

The answer c because as we seen in the graph the government imposing ceiling of 1000 at equilibrium point where the both opposite lines intersected that is at 10 firms .

16)C

As we notice in the graph that the tones of waste set it point at q1 on X axis at ceiling point 1000 at p1 on y axis

17)c

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
5f6 Figure 6.4 Date Atas per Tony Veghaturing MARGINAL EXTERNAL cost of poacution Super AAARAA Costa...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • 13. The marginal benefit of being able to emit a ton of sulfur dioxide emissions for...

    13. The marginal benefit of being able to emit a ton of sulfur dioxide emissions for two firms are given by: MBx 200 (Ex /2) MBy-300-(Ey3) Note that these marginal benefit figures can be interpreted as marginal cost of abating emission down to levels Ex and Ey Government regulators want to reduce total sulfur dioxide emissions to a total of 1000 tons If the government imposes the same standard of 500 tons maximum emissions on both firms what would be...

  • 1. The following figure shows the marginal abatement cost curve of a polluting firm. The status...

    1. The following figure shows the marginal abatement cost curve of a polluting firm. The status quo level of SO2 emissions of the firm is 100 tons. Suppose the government is targeting 50 tons of emissions from this firm. The government can achieve this target by setting emission standard of 50 tons or by imposing an emission tax t per ton of emission. The authority allows the source to choose between the standard and the tax t. Would the firm...

  • 04. Figure 6.1 shows the chemical emissions from a fertilizer plant and the marginal cost of...

    04. Figure 6.1 shows the chemical emissions from a fertilizer plant and the marginal cost of abatement. According to the diagram, what is the cheapest method of pollution abatement? a) Cleaning equipment b) Clean packaging c) Chemical washing d) Reformulate Usually, as the level of pollution increases a) Marginal external cost increases. b) The firm's marginal cost of pollution abatement increases. c) The total external cost decreases. d) All of the above In economics, the optimal quantity pollution means the...

  • Figure: City with Two Polluters Marginal benefit to individual producer $1,100 1,000MB 900 800 700 600...

    Figure: City with Two Polluters Marginal benefit to individual producer $1,100 1,000MB 900 800 700 600 500 MB 400 300 200 100 1,000 1,400 1,800 2,200 Quantity of pollution emissions (tons) 200 600 5. (Figure: City with Two Polluters) Look at the figure City with Two Polluters. If the govermment imposed an emissions tax of $400, firm A would produce produce A) 200; 400 B) 400; 1,200 C) 800; 1,400 D) 1,200; 1,600 , tons of emissions and firm B...

  • Joulutet 3. Assume that a firm has the following marginal benefit of pollution (denoted E for...

    Joulutet 3. Assume that a firm has the following marginal benefit of pollution (denoted E for emissions, measured in tons): MB=150-5 E e. Now assume that instead the government allocates each firm permits to pollute equal to the total current pollution minus 12 tons, but allows the firms to trade. Which firm will purchase permits and which firm will sell permits? Hint: Notice that total pollution reduction of firm 1 plus firm 2 will be 24 tons. f. How much...

  • Power stations emit sulfur dioxide as a waste product. This generates a cost to society that is not paid for by the fir...

     Power stations emit sulfur dioxide as a waste product. This generates a cost to society that is not paid for by the firm; therefore, pollution is a negative externality of power production. Suppose the U.S. government wants to correct this market failure by getting firms to internalize the cost of pollution. To do this, the government can charge firms for pollution rights (the right to emit a given quantity of sulfur dioxide). The following graph shows the daily demand for...

  • Power stations emit sulfur dioxide as a waste product. This generates a cost to society that...

    Power stations emit sulfur dioxide as a waste product. This generates a cost to society that is not paid for by the firm; therefore, pollution is a negative externality of power production. Suppose the U.S. government wants to correct this market failure by getting firms to internalize the cost of pollution. To do this, the government can charge firms for pollution rights (the right to emit a given quantity of sulfur dioxide). The following graph shows the daily demand for...

  • A firm’s marginal abatement cost function is given by MAC = 200–5E. Costs are in dollars...

    A firm’s marginal abatement cost function is given by MAC = 200–5E. Costs are in dollars per tonne and emissions are in tonnes per year. The firm is given 20 tradeable pollution permits (each permit allows it to emit one tonne of pollution) and the current market price per permit is $100. Suppose that, after adopting new abatement technology, the firms marginal abatement function becomes MAC = 160–4E a)Given no change in the permit price how many tonnes of pollution...

  • Assume that a firm has the following marginal benefit of pollution (denoted E for emissions, measured...

    Assume that a firm has the following marginal benefit of pollution (denoted E for emissions, measured in tons): MB=150-5E Q: How much would this firm pollute if pollution is unregulated? The government would like to reduce pollution from this amount by 12 tons and so implements a quantity constraint at the quantity in part (a) minus 12. What is the cost to this firm of reducing pollution by 12 tons? What tax would encourage this polluter to reduce pollution by...

  • Correcting for negative externalities - Taxes versus tradable permits Power stations emit sulfur dioxide as a...

    Correcting for negative externalities - Taxes versus tradable permits Power stations emit sulfur dioxide as a waste product. This generates a cost to society that is not paid for by the firm; therefore, pollution is a negative externality of power production. Suppose the U.S. government wants to correct this market failure by getting firms to internalize the cost of pollution. To do this, the government can charge firms for pollution rights (the right to emit a given quantity of sulfur...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT