Question

12:16 PM Sun Apr 7 a edisonohio blackboard.com QUESTION 15 CASE 4 A female patient arrives at the outpatient clinic with symptoms of lower back pain and urinary frequency burning sensation. She is a firm believer in the curative powers of vitamins. She has tripled her usual dosage of vitamins in an effort to alleviate her symptoms; however, the symptoms have persisted. She is sterile container and asked to collect a midstream clean catch urine specimen. Results of this urinalysis are as follows COLOR: dark yellow CLARITY: hazy KETONES: negative BLOOD: negative BILIRUBIN: negative SP GR.: 1.012 pH: 7.0 PROTEIN: trace GLUCOSE: negative UROBILINOGEN: normal NITRITE: negative LEUKOCYTE ESTERASE: 1+ MICROSCOPIC: 8-12 RBC/HPF HEAVY BACTERIA 40-50 WBC/HPF MODERATE SQUAMOUS EPITHELIAL CELLS What discrepancies between the chemical and microscopic results are present? Click Save and Submit to save and submit. Click Save All Answers to save all answers. BIV C interference interfered 6 z XC v b n m ?123

Answer 1

So..you can see that..there is..some similarities in both reports such as...in clinical report u can see that..urine clarity is hazy(means frothy)which is denoting the presence of bacteria and at the same time in microbiology report there is showing presence of heavy bacteria...second in clinical report there is leukocyte esatrase is positive,which is an indicator for urinary tract infection,and you can see the WBC in microbiology report..third one there is trace amount of protein is according to clinical report and there is also presence of moderate Squamus epithelial cells in microbiology report,which are the all discrepancies between the clinical and microbiology report....thank you.