A new test was compared with a gold standard measurement with the following results
Sensitivity
Specificity
Positive predictive value
Negative predictive value
New Test |
Gold Standard Positive |
Gold Standard Negative |
Positive |
18 |
2 |
Negative |
8 |
72 |
Sensitivity = P(positive on new test and gold standard positive) / P(gold standard positive)
= 18/(18+8)
= 0.6923
= 69.23%
Specificity = P(negative on new test and gold standard negative) / P(gold standard negative)
= 72/(2+72)
= 0.9730
= 97.30%
Positive predictive value = P(positive on new test and gold standard positive) / P(gold standard positive)
= 18/(18+2)
= 0.90
= 90%
Negative predictive value = P(negative on new test and gold standard negative) / P(gold standard negative)
= 72/(8+72)
= 0.9
= 90%
A new test was compared with a gold standard measurement with the following results Sensitivity Specificity...
a. Calculate and interpret the sensitivity of the new screening test. (Your interpretations should be limited to one sentence.) b. Calculate and interpret the specificity of the new screening test. c. Calculate and interpret the predictive value of a positive test. Questions 10-12 use the following information: Suppose that your company has just developed a new screening test for a disease and you are in charge of testing its validity and feasibility. You decide to evaluate the test on 1000...
a. Calculate and interpret the sensitivity of the new screening test. (Your interpretations should be limited to one sentence.) Can you please interpret this. b. Calculate and interpret the specificity of the new screening test. Can you please interpret this. c. Calculate and interpret the predictive value of a positive test. Can you please interpret this. Questions 10-12 use the following information: Suppose that your company has just developed a new screening test for a disease and you are in...
A psychiatrist devised a short screening test for depression. In order to determine this new test’s validity, an independent blind comparison was made with a gold standard for diagnosis of depression among a group of 200 psychiatric outpatients. Among the 50 outpatients found to be depressed according to the gold standard, 35 patients were positive for the test. Among 150 patients found not to be depressed according to the gold standard, 30 patients were found to be positive for the...
For Questions 22 through 24, please refer to the following scenario. A new screening test for Lyme disease is developed for use in the general population. The sensitivity and specificity of the new test are 60% and 70%, respectively. Three hundred patients are screened at a clinic during the first year the new test is implemented. The prevalence of Lyme disease among clinic patients is 10%. Gold Standard diagnosis Disease Yes Disease No Total ScreeningPositive Negative 22. (3 points) Fill...
A new antibody test detects serum antibodies against virus X (sensitivity 99%, specificity 90%). When applied in a group of hospitalized patients diagnosed as having virus X infections, the test is found to have a positive predictive value of 85%. When used to screen a group of healthy blood donors for virus X infections, the test is found to have a positive predictive value of 30%. Which of the following best explains this difference between the positive predictive values? A....
The table shows the results of a screening test of fasting blood glucose with the cut-off at 140 mg/dl. Compute the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Gold Standard for Diabetes Diagnosis Screening test Positive Negative Positive 34 20 54 Negative 116 9830 9946 150 9850 10000
Calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the Test Screen. Medical Assessment Test Screen Disease No Disease Total Possible Disease 30 20 50 No Disease 10 40 50 Total 40 60 100
Suppose that your company has just developed a new screening test for a disease and you are in charge of testing its validity and feasibility. You decide to evaluate the test on 1000 individuals and compare the results of the new test to the gold standard. You know the prevalence of disease in your population is 30%. The screening test gave a positive result for 292 individuals. Two hundred eighty-five (285) of these individuals actually had the disease on the...
For Questions 22 through 24, please refer to the following scenario. A new screening test for Lyme disease is developed for use in the general population. The sensitivity and specificity of the new test are 60% and 70%, respectively. Three hundred patients are screened at a clinic during the first year the new test is implemented. The prevalence of Lyme disease among clinic patients is 10%. Gold Standard diagnosis Disease Yes Disease No Total ScreeningPositive Negative 22. (3 points) Fill...
Problems 3-8 (1pt each) Amrit has developed a new in-home test to detect the presence of lead in water. He hopes it will be able to help people in Flint, Michigan test the water quality of their own homes. He collected the following results using the gold standard of laboratory analysis. He sampled 2020 homes across the US. In-Home Positive Lead Presence Positive Negative 10 Total 1399 1389 Negative 38 583 621 Total 1427 593 | 2020 T+: positive in-home...