why do proponents of absorption costing argue that absorption costing is preferable as the basis for pricing decisions?
The proponents of absorption costing argue that absorption costing is preferable as basis for pricing decesion because under absorption fixed manufacturing cost also form a part of product cost. The proponents of absorption costing argue that in production they also incurred the fixed cost like variable cost so it is part of product cost. If we exclude the fixed manufacturing cost from production process It will lead to underestimation of product cost. Under estimated product cost will lead to lower value of inventory. It means value of inventory under absorption costing will be more as compared to inventory under variable costing. Because under variable Costing fixed manufacturing cost is not part of product cost.
So product cost is under estimated in variable cost which will result lower price and that price will not cover the fixed manufacturing cost. But under absorption costing price will cover fixed cost as well as variable cost. So proponents of absorption costing preferred absorption costing for price decision because it covers fixed manufacturing cost and variable cost. Price under absorption costing will give more profit as compared to variable costing..
why do proponents of absorption costing argue that absorption costing is preferable as the basis for...
Comment the 5 reason of why absorption costing is preferable than marginal costing.
Which allocation base is preferable under traditional costing and why? Which costing system (traditional or activity-based) is preferable in pricing decisions and why?
Proponents of the LIFO inventory cost flow assumption argue that this costing methods is superior to the alternatives because it results in better matching of revenue and expense. A. explain why"better Matching" occurs with LIFO? B. What is the impact on the carrying value of inventory in the balance sheet when LIFO rather than FIFO is used during periods of inflation?
8) Opponents of variable costing argue that in the long run all costs are variable. (4pts) True O False 9) Fixed non-manufacturing costs are classified as period costs under variable costing, but not under absorption costing. True False
Why companies use the variable costing method when the absorption costing is the method approved by the General Accepted Accounting Principals. Provide at least 3 reasons that support the utilization the variable costing method.
Magney, Inc., uses the absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing described in the text to set prices for its products. Based on budgeted sales of 38,000 units next year, the unit product cost of a particular product is $61.50. The company's selling and administrative expenses for this product are budgeted to be $814,000 in total for the year. The company has invested $440,000 in this product and expects a return on investment of 11%. The selling price for this product...
Exercise 19-11 Pricing with Absorption Costing $100 $30 Calculate absorption cost per unit: Direct materials Direct labor Variable overhead Fixed overhead Total Absorption Cost per unit $8 $12 600,000/50,000 $150 $60 Target Selling price per unit: Absorption Cost per unit $150 Target Selling price per unit $210 Exercise 19-11 Absorption costing and product pricing @P4 Sirhuds Inc., a maker of smartwatches, reports the information below on its product. The company uses absorption costing and has a target markup of 40%...
1. What is absorption costing? 2. How is job-order costing different from process costing? 3. Why would a company choose one method over the other? 4. Provide a real-world example of a company that might use job-order costing (use an example not listed in the textbook).
Discuss the differences between variable and absorption costing. How does variable costing help a company make good management decisions? List some examples of ways in which a business would report items that utilize variable costing models. Please no duplicate answers.
timing is the key in distinguishing between absorption and variable costing. Can anyone explain why this statement important?