We must know the notations first :-
(P/A i,n) is Present Value factor of constant annual future payments.
(P/F i,n) is Present value factor of a single future payment.
Here, i = 15% and n = 6 for J
We can see from above table for Alternative J :-
Initial cost = -250000
Annual Income = 40,000
Annual Expenses = -14000
Salvage value = 35000
Sum of all present values will give Present Worth (PW) of J :-
PWJ = -250,000 + 40,000(P/A 15%,6) - 14,000(P/A 15%,6) + 35,000(P/F 15%,6)
PWJ = -250,000 + (40000-14000)(P/A 15%,6)+ 35,000(P/F 15%,6)
PWJ = -250,000 + 26,000(P/A 15%,6)+ 35,000(P/F 15%,6)
So, Option B is correct
In comparing alternatives, I and J by the present worth method, the equation that yields the...
Perform a present worth (PW)-based evaluation of the two alternatives below using a spreadsheet. The after-tax minimum acceptable rate of return (MARR) is 8% per year, Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) depreciation applies, and Te = 40%. The (GI-OE) estimate is made for the first 3 years; it is zero in year 4 when each asset is sold. Alternative X Y First Cost, $ -8,000 -13,000 Salvage Value, Year 4, $ 0 2,000 GI-OE, $ per Year 3,500 5,000...
Compare 10 years the alternatives C and D on the basis of a present worth analysis using an interest rate of 10% per year and a study period of Alternative rst Cost Annual Increase in Operating Cost, per Year Salvage Value $-1,000 $-1.200 0 The present worth of alternative C is S?m) and that of altern Click to select)offers the lower present worth analysis ative Dis $
Compare two alternatives, A and B. on the basis of a present worth evaluation using /= 10% per year and a study period of 8 years. Alternative A B First Cost $-19,000 $-46,000 Annual Operating Cost $-6,000 $-10,000 Overhaul in Year 4 $0 $-3,850 Salvage Value $1,200 $6,200 Life 8 years 4 years The present worth of alternative A is $ and that of alternative B is $ Alternative (Click to select) is selected.
Compare alternatives A and B with the present worth method if the MARR is 10% per year. Which one would you recommend? Assume repeatability and a study period of 20 years $15,000 $45,000 Capital Investment Operating Costs $4,000 at end of year 1 and increasing by $400 per year thereafter $4,000 every 5 years 20 years $8,000 at end of year 1 and increasing by $800 per year thereafter None Overhaul Costs Life 10 years Salvage Value $8,000 if just...
ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:-
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given. The interest rate is 20% per year. At the conclusion of the useful life, the investment will be sold A C Investment cost $28,000 $55,000 $13,000 $28,000 $8,000 $40,000 Annual expenses Annual revenues $15,000 $23,000 $6,000 10 years $22,000 $32,000 13 $10,000 Salvage value Useful life 10 years 10 years A decision-maker can select one of these alternatives or...
Compare alternatives A and B with the present worth method if the MARR is 11% per year. Which one would you recommend? Assume repeatability and a study period of 12 years. $25,000 $10,000 at end of year 1 and increasing by $1,000 per year thereafter None Capital Investment Operating Costs $55,000 $5,000 at end of year 1 and increasing by $500 per year thereafter $5,000 every 3 years 12 years $10,000 if just overhauled Overhaul Costs Life 6 years negligible...
A company needs a new mechanical device. Compute the present worth for these mutually exclusive alternatives. Identify which you would recommend and why for given i=10% per year. The company uses a 12-years planning horizon. Initial Cost Annual Costs Salvage Value Life Alternative A $8000 $700 $900 6 years Alternative B $10000 $800 $700 12 years
Solve for A and B, Engineering Economy
please solve it right!
Question Help %) Problem 6-52 (algorithmic) Compare alternatives A and B with the present worth method if the MARR is 15% per year. Which one would you recommend? Assume repeatability and a study period of 20 years. $40,000 $7,000 at end of year 1 and increasing by $700 per year thereafter $7,000 every 5 years $15,000 $14,000 at end of year 1 and increasing by $1,400 per year thereafter...
engineering economy
QUESTION 2 The following mutually exclusive investment alternatives have been presented to you A B C E Capital investment $60,000 $90,000 $40,000 $30,000 $70,000 Annual expenses $30,000 $40,000 $25,000 $15,000 $35,000 Annual revenues $50,000 $52,000 $38,000 $28,000 $45,000 MV at EOY 10 $15,000 $15,000 $10,000 $10,000 $15,000 IRR 31.5 % 7.4 % 30.8 % 42.5 % 9.2 % The life span of all alternatives is 10 years.. Using a MARR of 15 % per year, what is the...
3. Compare the two following two alternatives using an equivalent worth method and a MARR of 12%. The repeatability assumption is acceptable. Aternative I: Initial investment of $45,000, net revenue the first year of $8,000, increasing $4,000 per year for the six year useful life. Salvage value is estimated to be $6500. Alternative II: Initial investment of $60,000, uniform annual revenue of $12,000 for the five year useful life. Slavage value is estimated to be $9,000.