The correct answer is Inductive argument
If the premises are supposed to provide evidence or support but not conclusive proof of the conclusion, evaluate whether the premises, if true, would actually provide support for the conclusion . Inductive arguments are not truth-preserving, as it is possible for the premises in a strong inductive argument to be true while the conclusion is false.
for example, After careful observation we have not find any tigers all day in this forest. Therefore, probably there are no tigers in this forest.
an argument in which the primisis provide evidence for beliving the conclusion is true, but not...
QUESTION 1 An inductive argument aims: O A. None of these OB. to provide a jerk with the means to prove someone wrong C.to provide conclusive support for the truth of the conclusion via the premises Dito provide probable support for the conclusion via the premises
1.The conclusion of a deductive argument can be false. a)True b)False 2. A deductive argument: a)cannot have a false conclusion b)is necessary reasoning c)is a cogent argument d)all of the above 3.If an argument is valid, and all the premises are true, then the conclusion is always true. a)True b)False 4. What sentence is a proposition a)Did you study for this test? b)What is the good-life? c)Know thyself d)Most educated people earn more money.
An argument is valid ONLY when both its premises and conclusion are true. True or false?
1) In a good inductive argument, the conclusion can be false, but it is probably true. True False 2) What kind of argument is this: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal. Deductive Categorical syllogism Aristelian All of the above 3) An inductive argument: a) is a valid argument b) is a sound argument c) is probable reasoning d) all of the above
A philosophical argument is made up of one or more premises and a conclusion. If the premises lead to the conclusion (that is, if the conclusion must follow from the premises), the argument is valid. True or False
If an inductively strong argument has a probably false conclusion then which of the following must be true? a. It is valid. b.All of its premises are true. c. Some of its premises are probably true. d. It is sound. e. It is cogent. f. At least one of its premises is probably false. g.All of its premises are necessarily false. h. Some of its premises are necessarily false.
Which of the following is evidence that is not based on personal knowledge but that was told to the witness? A. Best evidence B. Secondary evidence C. Conclusive evidence D. Hearsay evidence
BIOLOGY PHOTOSYNTHESIS Bonus points! Provide evidence for your argument by giving the following: 1. How many energy containing molecules are required in the Calvin cycle to produce 1 molecule of glucose 2. How much energy can be extracted from 1 molecule of glucose under aerobic conditions:
Deductive reasoning is a process in which a speaker guides the audience to accept a conclusion which benefits the speaker's argument. Select the response which most accurately represents the steps and flow of information in the deductive reasoning process. Minor premise to Major premise to Specific evidence Major/Broad premise to Minor premise to Specific evidence None of the above Specific evidence to Minor premise to Major premise
Determine whether the following are arguments are not. If an argument, state the conclusion. If not an argument, state what kind of nonargument it is. Question 113 (1 point) Surprisingly, whistleblowing is a morally ambiguous activity on a complex combination of grounds: It necessarily involves a betrayal of trust on behalf of a public interest which itself is on some occasions morally ambiguous. It indicts otherwise morally competent individuals and organizations concerned with being perceived as legitimate. Sometimes it arouses...