rate of return = r
alternative 1:
5000 + 3000/(1 + r) = 4000/(1 + r)2 + 4000/(1 + r)3 + 4000/(1 + r)4
r = 16.94%
alternative 2:
5000 = 2000/(1 + r) + 2000/(1 + r)2 + 4000/(1 + r)3 + 4000/(1 + r)4
r = 21.86%
Alternative 2 should be selected (higher rate of return)
For the cash flows below, if 6% is the minimum attractive rate of return, which alternative...
Please show all of your work! Thank you
[Problem 7-63] If 8% is considered the minimum attractive rate of return, which alternative should be selected using an incremental analysis? Year 0 1 х -$5000 -3000 4000 4000 4000 -$5000 2000 2000 2000 2000
2. [Problem 7-63] If 8% is considered the minimum attractive rate of return, which alternative should be selected using an incremental analysis? Year -$5000 -3000 4000 4000 4000 -$5000 2000 2000 2000 2000 3. [Problem 8-5] A stockbroker has proposed two investments in low-rated corporate bonds paying high interest rates and selling at steep discounts (junk bond). The bonds are rated as equally risky and both mature in 15 years. Bond Stated Value Annual Interest Payment $67 Current Market Price...
Please show how the IRR formula is done. Thank you!
Problem 7-63] If 8% is considered the minimum attractive rate of return, which alternative should be selected using an incremental analysis? Year X -$5000 0 -$5000 1 -3000 2000 2 4000 2000 3 4000 2000 4 4000 2000
Using Rate of Return Analysis, determine the most economical alternative below. Assume a minimum attractive rate of retum of 696, and a 6-year life with no salvage value for each. The alternatives are mutually exclusive. Initial cost Annual Cost Annual Benefit IRR.% $3000,000 10000 120,300 18 $100,000 25000 40800 $500,000 12000 9000 150200 55200 12 45
Using Rate of Return Analysis, determine the most economical alternative below. Assume a minimum attractive rate of retum of 696, and a 6-year life with no salvage value for each. The alternatives are mutually exclusive. Initial cost Annual Cost Annual Benefit IRR.% $3000,000 10000 120,300 18 $100,000 25000 40800 $500,000 12000 9000 150200 55200 12 45
Using Rate of Return Analysis, determine the most economical alternative below. Assume a minimum attractive rate of retum of 696, and a 6-year life...
Projects A and B are mutually exclusive. The minimum attractive rate of return (MARR) is 5%. Using rate of return analysis, which project should be selected? Year B-A $1,000 $200 $200 $300 $400 3.47% $1,500 $350 $400 $450 $500 4.90% $500 150 $200 $150 $100 8.28% 0 3 4 ROR
QUESTION 23 Two alternatives have the following cash flows: Alternative Year A B 0 -$10000 -$15000 1 +$3000 +$4400 2 +$3000 +$4400 3 +$3000 +$4400 4 +$3000 +$4400 Assuming a 5% MARR, use incremental analysis to determine which alternative should be selected?
6. A Texas corporation is considering the following two alternatives: Before Tax Cash Flow (thousands) Year Alternative 1 Alternative 2 10,000 20,000 0 1- 10 4,500 4,500 11-20 0 4,500 Both alternatives will be depreciated with 7 year MACRS depreciation. As Texas has no state income tax requirement, the combined income tax rate for the company is 21%. Neither alternative is replaced at the end of its useful life. If the corporation has a minimum attractive rate of return of...
1. Given the costs and benefits of two water pumps, what is the rate of return on the difference of these alternatives? Year -$3000 +800 +800 +800 +800 +800 -$3800 +1200 +1200 +1200 +1200 +1200 What is your choice of these 2 alternatives and why? 2. The manager of a local restaurant is trying to decide whether to buy a charcoal broiling unit or an electric grill for cooking hamburgers. A market study shows customers prefer charcoal broiling but the...
The cash flows for four projects are shown below, along with the cost of capital for these projects. If these projects are mutually exclusive, which one should be taken? $2000 $2000 $2000 $2000 $2000 0 $2500 $2500 $2500 $2500 $2,500 O A. Year: Cash flow: -$5000 Cost of Capital: 6.1% O B. Year: Cash flow: - $6000 Cost of Capital: 7.4% O C. Year: Cash flow: -$7000 Cost of Capital: 7.8% OD. Year: 0 Cash flow: - $8000 Cost of...