Question

We present the case of a person whose presumed code-status preference led him to tattoo “Do Not Resuscitate” on his chest. Paramedics brought an unconscious 70-year-old man with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, and atrial fibrillation to the emergency department, where he was found to have an elevated blood alcohol level. The staff of the medical intensive care unit evaluated him several hours later when hypotension and an anion-gap metabolic acidosis with a pH of 6.81 developed. His anterior chest had a tattoo that read “Do Not Resuscitate,” accompanied by his presumed signature (Figure 1). Because he presented without identification or family, the social work department was called to assist in contacting next of kin. All efforts at treating reversible causes of his decreased level of consciousness failed to produce a mental status adequate for discussing goals of care.

We initially decided not to honor the tattoo, invoking the principle of not choosing an irreversible path when faced with uncertainty. This decision left us conflicted owing to the patient’s extraordinary effort to make his presumed advance directive known; therefore, an ethics consultation was requested. He was placed on empirical antibiotics, received intravenous fluid resuscitation and vasopressors, and was treated with bilevel positive airway pressure.

After reviewing the patient’s case, the ethics consultants advised us to honor the patient’s do not resuscitate (DNR) tattoo. They suggested that it was most reasonable to infer that the tattoo expressed an authentic preference, that what might be seen as caution could also be seen as standing on ceremony, and that the law is sometimes not nimble enough to support patient-centered care and respect for patients’ best interests. A DNR order was written. Subsequently, the social work department obtained a copy of his Florida Department of Health “out-of-hospital” DNR order, which was consistent with the tattoo. The patient’s clinical status deteriorated throughout the night, and he died without undergoing cardiopulmonary respiration or advanced airway management.

This patient’s tattooed DNR request produced more confusion than clarity, given concerns about its legality and likely unfounded beliefs¹that tattoos might represent permanent reminders of regretted decisions made while the person was intoxicated. We were relieved to find his written DNR request, especially because a review of the literature identified a case report of a person whose DNR tattoo did not reflect his current wishes.² Despite the well-known difficulties that patients have in making their end-of-life wishes known,³–⁵ this case report neither supports nor opposes the use of tattoos to express end-of-life wishes when the person is incapacitated.

Write a 1,250-1,500 word paper in which you explore decision making methods that can be used to resolve an ethical dilemma using the scenario provided in the assigned reading, "An Unconscious Patient With a DNR Tattoo." Describe how to use the principles of ethical decision making (reviewed in this topic) to help resolve this ethical dilemma. Address the scenario to generate your conclusions about how you would proceed.

1. What are the dimensions of the ethical dilemma?
2. What are the potential organizational policies to which you will refer?
3. Apply the four core health care ethical principles and the process of ethical decision making in formulating your assistance to the clinical staff.

Answer 1

Principles:

• Identify the ethical problems in operational terms:
• look for explicit and implicit guidelines relevant to the situation.
• explore rights and duties of stakeholders.
• respond to intuitive cues.

According to this scenario methods to be used:

• consult: combined inputs should be gather( to discuss the DNR tattoo and its legalisation) to come down to a point.
• command: the concerned person should make the last decision with no involvement. in this case next to kin not approachable therefore, the ethical consultants decision is acceptable.
• consensus: clearing everyone's doubts and thoughts and point views, discuss until everyone agrees to one decision.
• vote: after discussing options call for a vote to check the number of preference what to be done.

potential organisational policies:

• policy making is concerned with the formulation of general statements or understandings that guide managerial decisions. in this case the DNR tattoo was implied as a policy because it expressed an authentic preference.
• policies whether written or implied are essential components because the simplify the making of recurring decisions and facilitates the delegation of the decisions.
• successive delegations tend to result in a hierarchy of policies . In this case hospital attendant's, social workers and ethical consultants were successfully delegated.