Question

Please read and answer the question: FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE CASEY ANTHONY TRIAL Facts On July...

Please read and answer the question:

FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE CASEY ANTHONY TRIAL
Facts
On July 15, 2008, Cynthia Anthony, mother of Casey Anthony and grandmother of Caylee Anthony, called 911 to report Casey Anthony for stealing a vehicle and money. In another 911 call, Cynthia Anthony shared with the 911 operator that she learned from Casey of Caylee Anthony’s kidnapping. In addition, Cindy reports of that her daughter’s car “smells like there’s been dead body in the damn car.”
Casey Anthony reports that she last saw Caylee Anthony when dropping her off with the nanny on June 9, 2008. The name provided for the nanny was Zanaida Fernandez-Gonzalez. Casey led the investigators to the alleged apartment in which Zanaida was staying but discovered the apartment to be vacant since late February. Casey also reported that she was employed by Universal Studios. Upon investigation, it was discovered that Casey had last been employed by Universal Studios approximately two years before.
Due to the inconsistencies in Casey Anthony’s official statements to the police along with the delayed reporting of the missing child, an arrest was made against Casey Anthony for neglect of a child, false official statements, and obstruction of a criminal investigation.
Human Hair found in trunk of Casey Anthony’s vehicle: The theory that Casey Anthony stored her daughter in the trunk after subduing Caylee with chloroform was bolstered by the hair found in the trunk. The discovered hair was identified as human hair but because of the absence of hair root or tissue DNA could not be extracted for precise identification. Microscopically, the unknown hair sample found in the trunk exhibited similarities to a known hair sample of Caylee Anthony but could not be confirmed with certainty. Instead, mitochondrial DNA was used to narrow down the identity. Mitochondrial DNA is forensically useful to confirm a female lineage but does not individualize to one person. Therefore, confirming the human hair found in the trunk as one that comes from the Anthony female lineage is the only information deduced from the mitochondrial DNA analysis. The FBI laboratory analysis on the human hair found in the trunk of Casey Anthony’s vehicle exhibited characteristics of decomposition near the end where the root would be found.
After 33 days of testimony, the jury found the defendant, Casey Anthony, not guilty for the charges of first-degree murder of Caylee Anthony, aggravated child abuse, and aggravated manslaughter of a child. She was found guilty for four counts of false information in a criminal investigation, check forgery. A civil suit for defamation against Casey Anthony was filed by Zenaida Fernandez-Gonzalez. The state also filed that Casey Anthony must pay for the costs of lying to law enforcement as well as the search for Caylee Anthony. This amount summed up to $217,000

a. How many days had Cayley Anthony been missing before it was reported?

b. What physical evidence was found?

c. What type of testing was performed on the evidence and what were the results?

d. What was it about the evidence that made it impossible to identify who it came from?

e. Do you think the evidence was more significant and should have been stressed in the case? Why or why not?

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

a.Caylee Anthony was missing from June 8,2008 and reported to 911 on July 15,2008 .She was missing for 37 days before it was reported.

b.A hair sample is the only physical evidence in this case

c.First a DNA test was done to identify whose hair it was,but unfortunately the root of the hair was missing to identify the exact person. Later a mitochondria test was done and it was identified as a female hair.

d.For a DNA testing from a hair ,the hair follicles are necessary because this is located underneath the skin and will have some cells which contained DNA. (This broken hair can only identify mtDNA _a character or DNA passed in a female lineage from grandmother to daughter ,and from daughter to grand daughter) but it cannot identify the exavt person

e.The only evidence (hair) should have been stressed important in the case because the report reveals that the hair came as a female lineage of Anthony family.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Please read and answer the question: FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE CASEY ANTHONY TRIAL Facts On July...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Please read and answer the question: FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE CASEY ANTHONY TRIAL Facts On July...

    Please read and answer the question: FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE CASEY ANTHONY TRIAL Facts On July 15, 2008, Cynthia Anthony, mother of Casey Anthony and grandmother of Caylee Anthony, called 911 to report Casey Anthony for stealing a vehicle and money. In another 911 call, Cynthia Anthony shared with the 911 operator that she learned from Casey of Caylee Anthony’s kidnapping. In addition, Cindy reports of that her daughter’s car “smells like there’s been dead body in the damn car.”...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT