Question

2. This problem uses the Heckscher-Ohlin model to predict the direction of trade. Consider the production of handmade rugs and assembly line robots in Canada and India. a. Which country would you expect to be rela- tively labor-abundant, and which is capital- abundant? Why? b. Which industry would you expect to be rel- atively labor-intensive, and which is capital- intensive? Why? c. Given your answers to (a) and (b), draw production possibilities frontiers for each country. Assurning that consumer preferences are the same in both countries, add indifference curves and relative price lines (without trade) to your PPF graphs. What do the slopes of the price lines tell you about the direction of trade? d. Allowing for trade between countries, redraw the graphs and include a “trade triangle” for each country. Identify and label the vertical and horizontal sides of the triangles as either imports or exports. e. Using the PPF graphs from (c) and relative prices under autarky and trade, explain how both countries gain from trade.

Answer 1

2) a) India is labour abondand and canada is capital abondant country.

b) Handmade rugs are labour intensive and robots are capital intensive indutries.

c)  

Rot... - - - - - - de it and male rugs

Rit - - - - Robort "Rot- – – – – – – – 1.de Handmade rugs