As a result of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the United States and Canada shifted toward free trade with Mexico. According to the Stolper–Samuelson theorem, how did this shift affect the real wage of unskilled labor in Mexico? In the United States or Canada? How did it affect the real wage of skilled labor in Mexico? In the United States or Canada?
Please No bad handwriting. I need to understand it. Thanks!
According to the Stolper-Samuelson theorem, when the relative price of a good rises, the factor prices for that factor which is used intensively in the production of that good rises and vice versa. It means that if relative price of labor intensive good rises, the wages of labor will rise.
Now, coming back to the given situation, Mexico largely unskilled workers and thus, a comparative advantage in production of unskilled labour intensive good. Unlike Mexico, US and Canada have skilled labours and thus, they have comparative advantage in skilled goods production.
A. After NAFTA, the Mexico started exporting unskilled labour intensive goods and thus, the demand for those labors rose. This should according to Stolper-Samuelson theorem lead to increase in the wages of unskilled labors in Mexico.
B. The unskilled labors in United States and Canada, now face threat from imported unskilled labour intensive goods from Mexico. Thus, the demand for unskilled labors in Canada and United States would fall. As a result, their wages would fall as well.
C. The skilled labors in Mexico face competition from American and Canadian skill intensive goods. Thus, the demand for skilled labour in Mexico will fall. This would lead to a fall in their wages.
D. The United States and Canada have comparative advantage in the production of skill intensive goods due to abundant skilled labor. Thus, these countries produce more of skill intensive goods after trade agreement.
Producing more of these goods require that more skilled labour be employed and thus, the demand for skilled labour would rise. As a result the real wages of skilled labor in US nad Canada rise.
As a result of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the United States and Canada...
How large is NAFTA? The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a multilateral trade agreement between Canada, Mexico, and the United States that came into effect in 1994. Real GDP for the United States–adjusted for exchange rates and differences in the cost of living–in 1994 was approximately $10.23 trillion. a) Data on nominal GDP and prices for Canada and Mexico in 1994 are provided in the following table. ---------------GDP----------exchange rate-----P/PUSA Canada --- C$1.10 trillion-----1.36 C$/$-----0.91 Mexico Mex$2.23 trillion-----3.38 Mex$/$-----0.67...
How large is NAFTA? The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a multilateral trade agreement between Canada, Mexico, and the United States that came into effect in 1994. Real GDP for the United States–adjusted for exchange rates and differences in the cost of living–in 1994 was approximately $10.23 trillion. a) Data on nominal GDP and prices for Canada and Mexico in 1994 are provided in the following table. ---------------GDP----------exchange rate-----P/PUSA Canada --- C$1.10 trillion-----1.36 C$/$-----0.91 Mexico Mex$2.23 trillion-----3.38 Mex$/$-----0.67...
What were the economic effects of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)? O A. The wages for both U.S. and Mexican workers decreased OB. Consumption increased in the United States but decreased in Canada. OC. U.S. exports of motor vehicles to Mexico decreased. OD. Employment in the United States increased by as much as 21 million jobs O E. All of the above.
2) The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), signed in 1994, reduced trade barriers between the United States, Canada, and Mexico. During the 2016 presidential campaign, several prominent candidates from both parties denounced NAFTA as having had a negative impact on jobs in the United States. In particular, they cited the impact on manufacturing jobs. a. In what ways might free trade agreements have a negative impact on jobs in the U.S.? Briefly explain. Is it possible that free trade...
While Canada and the United States are often considered part of “North America,” the nation of Mexico is sometimes included (the North American Free Trade Agreement [NAFTA], for example). Compare and contrast the nations of Canada, the United States, and Mexico.
During the beated discussions in the United States about the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), many observers stated that adoption of the agreement would lead to a surge of investment from the United States into Mexico because of Mexico's much lower wages. From the standpoint of tariff elimination alooe, bow might NAFTA rednce the amount of U.S. investment in Mexicol? The pominal tariff rates on the 10 imports into the fictional country of Tarheelia, as well as the total...
When the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) started in 1994, many were worried that large job losses in the U.S. textile industry would occur as companies moved production from the United States to Mexico. NAFTA opponents argued passionately, but unsuccessfully, that the treaty should not be adopted because of the negative impact it would have on U.S. employment. A quick glance at the data available 10 years after the passage of NAFTA suggests the critics had a point. Between...
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) allowed free movement of Americans, Canadians, and Mexicans among the three countries. True or False? Not sure if he means free mivement of people or trade?
Discuss the positive and negative effects of the North American Free Trade Agreement on the United States. Support your conclusions with examples and evidence?
1. Although the amount of global trade is less than __________ percent of the total American GDP, this trade is of critical importance. a.5 b. 10 c. 15 d. 25 2. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has _______________ trade among Canada, the United States, and Mexico. a.decreased b. had no effect on c. increased d.none of the above