Nash equilibrium is a concept within game theory where the optimal outcome of a game is where there is no incentive to deviate from their initial strategy. Overall, an individual can receive no incremental benefit from changing actions, assuming other players remain constant in their strategies.
Real-world example:
Imagine a game between Tom and Sam. In this simple game, both players can choose strategy A, to receive $1, or strategy B, to lose $1. Logically, both players choose strategy A and receive a payoff of $1. Logically both the players choose strategy A and receive a payoff of $1. If one knew the strategy of the other then we will see that no player deviates from the original choice. The outcome A represents a Nash equilibrium.
Kindly upvote :)
There can be more than one Nash Equilibrium or no Nash Equilibrium at all. In the following game HA and CA are trying to decide which segment of the market to appeal to with advertising, prices,special promotions, etc. Each firm has two strategies available: appeal high income customers, or appeal to lower income customers. ^If both try to appeal to high income customers they will directly compete against each other and each firm gets a payoff of 50. ^If both...
Discuss one functional class of neurons and provide an example.
Please provide and discuss one example of a recent event or incident that supports the idea that our legal and political system is akin to a "rule of law" system. In addition, discuss and provide at least one example of a recent event or incident that makes you think our legal or political system may be closer to a "rule by law" system.
Discuss one ethical principal that is evident in health reform and provide an example
What is the Nash equilibrium for this game? A. A Nash equilibrium does not exist for this game. B.The Nash equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a low output and Kuwait to produce a high output C.The Nash equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high output and Kuwait to produce a high output. D. The Nash equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a low output and Kuwait to produce a low output. E. The Nash equilibrium...
5. Explain the difference between a Nash equilibrium and a dominant strategies equilibrium. Give an example to show how the prisoners' dilemma helps to explain behaviour. 6. Why might a firm set prices based on a markup above average cost rather than equalising marginal costs and marginal benefits? 7. Using a diagram, explain how an external cost of production (i.e. a negative production externality) can be internalised with a tax. |8. Explain the conditions of price discrimination. Give two examples...
What is the Nash equilibrium for this game? A. A Nash equilibrium does not exist for this game. B. The Nash equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a low output and Kuwait to produce a high output. C. The Nash equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high output and Kuwait to produce a high output. D. The Nash equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a low output and Kuwait to produce a low output. E. The...
Discuss the benefits of business analytics and provide one example how it can be used to help an organization address cybersecurity. Need 400 words
What is your understanding of the term "Symbolic Struggles"? Provide and discuss one example of a symbolic struggle. Do you think it is an effective strategy in dealing with domination?
Discuss and provide at least one example of a recent event or incident that makes you think our legal or political system may be closer to a "rule by law" system.