Follow these steps:
Let LL be a regular language. Then there exists an integer n≥1n≥1 (depending only on LL) such that every string ww in LL of length at least nn (pp is called the "pumping length") can be written as w=xyzw=xyz (i.e., ww can be divided into three substrings), satisfying the following conditions:
Assume that you are given some language LL and you want to show that it is not regular via the pumping lemma. The proof looks like this:
6.[15 points] Recall the pumping lemma for regular languages: Theorem: For every regular language L, there...
The pumping lemma for regular languages is Theorem 1.70 on page 78 of the required text. Definition: w is a string if and only if there exists an alphabet such that w is a string over that alphabet. Note: For every alphabet, the empty string is a string over that alphabet. Notation: For any symbol o, gº denotes the empty string, and for every positive integer k, ok denotes the string of length k over the alphabet {o}. 1) (20%]...
Pumping lemma s. (7+5 points) Pumping lemma for regular languages. In all cases, -a,b) a) Consider the following regular language A. ping length p 2 1. For each string s e pumping lemma, we can write s -xy, with lyl S p, and s can be pumped. Since A is regular, A satisfies the pumping lemma with pum A, where Is] 2 p, by the a) Is p 3 a pumping length for language 4? (Yes/No) b) Show that w...
Use the pumping lemma for regular languages to carefully prove that the language { aibjck : 0≤ i < j < k } is not regular.
4. (15 points) Using the pumping lemma for regular languages show that the following language is not regular
Can someone use pumping Lemma to show if these are regular languages or not c) Is L regular? give a finite automaton or prove using pumping lemma. (d) Is L context-free? give a context-free grammar or pushdown automaton, otherwise pr using pumping lemma. (16 pts)Given the set PRIMES (aP | p is prime (a) Prove that PRIMES is not regular. (b) Prove that PRIMES is not context-free. (c) Show if complement of PRIMES (PRIMES ) is regular or not. d)...
Show that there exists a non-regular language that satisfies the pumping lemma. In particular, you can consider the following language. nan . You need to show that (1) L is not regular, and (2) L satisfies the pumping lemma. Show that there exists a non-regular language that satisfies the pumping lemma. In particular, you can consider the following language. nan . You need to show that (1) L is not regular, and (2) L satisfies the pumping lemma.
Use the pumping lemma to show that each of the following languages is not regular. L = {0i 1j 0k |k > i + j} Not entierly sure what to do when there are 3 variables.
Use the pumping lemma to show that the following language is not regular: L = {bi ajbi : i, j ≥ 1}
6. (10 pts) Is L regular? Either prove that it is not regular using pumping lemma, or describe an RE for it. The alphabet of the language is 10,1, +,-) L = { x = y + z | x, y, z are binary integers, and x is the sum of y and z }. For example, strings 1000 = 101 + 11, 0101 = 010 + 11, and 101 = 101 + 0 are in the language, but strings...
Exercise 4.1.1: Prove that the following are not regular languages a) (0"1n|n 2 1). This language, consisting of a string of 0's followed by an cqual-length string of 1's, is the language Loi we considered informally at the beginning of the scction. Here, you should apply the pumping lemma in the proof. b) The set of strings of balanced parentheses. These are the strings of char- acters "(" and " that can appear in a well-formed arithmetic expression *c) O"IO"...