1)
an example, show that Turing-recognizable languages are not closed under comple 1. Using mentation
Q1: Which of the following claims are true?* 1 point The recognizable languages are closed under union and intersection The decidable lanquages are closed under union and intersection The class of undecidable languages contains the class of recognizable anguages For every language A, at least one of A or A*c is recognizable Other: This is a required question Q2: Which of the following languages are recognizable? (Select all that apply) 1 point EDFA-{ «A> 1 A is a DFA and...
1. (10 points) Show that the Turing Decidable languages are closed under complementation. If L is Turing Decidable then so is the complement -L. 1. (10 points) Show that the Turing Decidable languages are closed under complementation. If L is Turing Decidable then so is the complement -L.
Give examples of the following sets (languages): a. A set (language) that is Turing-recognizable but not decidable b. A set (language) that is decidable but not context-free c. A set (language) that is context-free but not regular
Investigate and Prove that the following closure properties hold for Turing machines Theorem 7: Both the Turing-recognizable and Turing- decidable languages are closed under concatenation and star.
7. (1 point) The collection of recognizable languages is closed under: A. union. B. concatenation. C. star. D. intersection. E. All of the above. Page 3 of 8 8. (1 point) L is decided by a deterministic) TM containing 100 tapes in time t(n) where n denotes the length of an input string. Which one of the following represents the time complexity of an equivalent single tape (deterministic) TM which decides L? A. Oft(n) 100). B. Oſt(n)). C. O(t(n)99). D....
Quick Quiz Is the following true? 1. If L is Turing-decidable, L is Turing- recognizable If L is Turing-recognizable, L is Turing- decidable 2. 3. If L is Turing-decidable, so is t 4. If L is Turing-recognizable, so is L 5. If both L and L are Turing-recognizable, L is Turing-decidable
Show that the family of context-free languages is closed under reversal.
Show using a cross-product construction that the class of regular languages is closed under set difference. You do not need an inductive proof, but you should convincingly explain why your construction works.
Show using a cross-product construction that the class of regular languages is closed under set difference. You do not need an inductive proof, but you should convincingly explain why your construction works.
2. (15) Show using a cross-product construction that the class of regular languages is closed under set difference. You do not need an inductive proof, but you should convincingly explain why your construction works.