NPW of alternative C = -44000 - 12000 * (P/A, 12%,10) - 1200 * (P/G, 12%,10) + 5000 * (P/F, 12%,10)
= -44000 - 12000 * 5.650223 - 1200 * 20.254089 + 5000 * 0.321973
= -134497.72
NPW of alternative D = -34000 - 7000 * (P/A, 12%,5) - 1500 * (P/G, 12%,5) + 1200 * (P/F, 12%,5) + (-34000 - 7000 * (P/A, 12%,5) - 1500 * (P/G, 12%,5) + 1200 * (P/F, 12%,5))*(P/F, 12%,5)
= -34000 - 7000 * 3.604776 - 1500 * 6.397016 + 1200 * 0.567427 + (-34000 - 7000 * 3.604776 - 1500 * 6.397016 + 1200 * 0.567427)* 0.567427
= -106817.08
Alternative D whould be selected as it has lowr present cost
Problem 05.023 Alternative Comparison - Different Lives Compare the alternatives C and D on the basis...
Problem 05.023 Alternative Comparison - Different Lives Compare the alternatives C and D on the basis of a present worth analysis using an interest rate of 10% per year and a study period of 10 years. $ 40,000 $-6,000 D $-22.000 $-3,000 Alternative First Cost AOC, per Year Annual Increase in Operating Cost, per Year Salvage Value Life, Years $-200 $-300 $7,000 10 $200 5 The present worth of alternative C is $ and that of alternative D is $...
Compare 10 years the alternatives C and D on the basis of a present worth analysis using an interest rate of 10% per year and a study period of Alternative rst Cost Annual Increase in Operating Cost, per Year Salvage Value $-1,000 $-1.200 0 The present worth of alternative C is S?m) and that of altern Click to select)offers the lower present worth analysis ative Dis $
I cant get alternative y Problem 14.030: Compare alternatives by calculating their capitalized cost Compare the alternatives below on the basis of their capitalized costs with adjustments made for inflation. Use 3.2% per year. 10% per year and Alternative First cost,$ -19,000,000 13,500,000 -10,000 82,000 10 AOC, $per year25,000 Salvage value, $ Life, years 105,000 The capitalized cost for alternative X is s -19199107 The capitalized cost for alternative Y is $ 135762 。 Select alternative「-Y- O Problem 14.030: Compare...
Compare two alternatives, A and B. on the basis of a present worth evaluation using /= 10% per year and a study period of 8 years. Alternative A B First Cost $-19,000 $-46,000 Annual Operating Cost $-6,000 $-10,000 Overhaul in Year 4 $0 $-3,850 Salvage Value $1,200 $6,200 Life 8 years 4 years The present worth of alternative A is $ and that of alternative B is $ Alternative (Click to select) is selected.
Y 0.83 points Compare the alternatives below on the basis of their capitalized costs with adjustments made for inflation. Use i=12% per year and f= 3.8% per year. Alternative х First cost, $ -16,000,000 -14,500,000 AOC, $ per year -25,000 -10.000 Salvage value, $ 105,000 82,000 Life, years 10 eBook Hint Print The capitalized cost for alternative X is $ References The capitalized Click to select) IS Select alternativex
show the formula Compare the following alternatives on the basis of Present worth Analysis at an interest rate of 6% per year.|| First Cost, $ Annual Operating cost, $ /year Annual Revenues, $/year Salvage Value, $ Life years Petroleum Based Feedstock -350,000 -130,000 300,000 45,000 Inorganic Based Feedstock -120,000 -60,000 290,000 34,000 You should consider Least Common Multiple of 6 and 4) which is 12 years in your analysis instead of 4 or 6 years! Petroleum Based Feedstock Inorganic Based...
3. Compare the alternatives shown below on the basis of their Annual Worth, using an interest rate of 12% per year. Alternative I Alternative II 160.000 25,000 First Cost 15.000 3,000 Annual Operating Cost 1,000,000 4,000 Salvage Value Life. Years
can you solve it by using Excel Alternative Comparison-Different Lives 5.17 Dexcon Technologies, Inc. is evaluating two alter- natives to produce its new plastic filament with tribological (i.e., low friction) properties for creat- ing custom bearings for 3-D printers. The esti- mates associated with each alternative are shown below. Using a MARR of 20 % per year, which al- ternative has the lower present worth? LS DDM Method -370,000 -164,000 First cost, $ -21,000 -55,000 M&O cost, $/year 30,000...
Solve it in spreadsheet money, anu Juuay pu mom. Alternative Comparison-Different Lives 5.17 Dexcon Technologies, Inc. is evaluating two alter- natives to produce its new plastic filament with tribological (i.e., low friction) properties for creat- ing custom bearings for 3-D printers. The esti- mates associated with each alternative are shown below. Using a MARR of 20% per year, which al- ternative has the lower present worth? Method First cost, $ M&O cost, $/year Salvage value, $ Life, years DDM -...
Assume a mutually exclusive scenario. Compare three alternatives on the basis of their capitalized cost (CC) at i=10% per year, which is the best alternative in this scenario? • Alternative 1, AW = $87,500 and n = (forever) • Alternative 2, PW = -$895,000 and n = (forever) • Alternative 3, First cost (FC) of $900,000, annual operating savings of 3,000 per year, salvage = $200,000, and n = (forever) Alternative 2 Alternative 3 None of them Alternative 1 QUESTION...